Fresh versus Frozen Embryo Transfer in In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Neonatal Outcomes

被引:2
作者
Tocariu, Raluca [1 ,2 ]
Niculae, Lucia Elena [3 ]
Niculae, Alexandru Stefan [3 ]
Carp-Veliscu, Andreea [1 ,2 ]
Bratila, Elvira [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bucharest 050474, Romania
[2] Clin Hosp Obstet & Gynecol Prof Dr Panait Sarbu, Bucharest 060251, Romania
[3] Univ Med & Pharm Iuliu Hatieganu, Mother & Child Dept, Cluj Napoca 400347, Romania
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2024年 / 60卷 / 08期
关键词
in vitro fertilization; embryo transfer; adverse birth outcomes; neonatal prematurity; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; CHILDREN BORN; BIRTH; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3390/medicina60081373
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Although considerable research has been devoted to examining the distinctions between fresh and frozen embryo transfer regarding obstetric outcomes and rates of pregnancy success, there is still a scarcity of thorough analyses that specifically examine neonatal outcomes. The objective of our study was to provide an in-depth analysis of neonatal outcomes that occur after the transfer of fresh and frozen embryos (ET vs. FET) in IVF/ICSI cycles. Materials and Methods: Multiple databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wiley, Scopus, Ovid and Science Direct) were searched from January 1980 to February 2024. Two reviewers conducted the article identification and data extraction, meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) or the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Results: Twenty studies, including 171,481 participants in total, were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analyses. A significant increase in preterm birth rates was noted with fresh embryo transfer compared to FET in the overall IVF/ICSI population (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.18-1.35, p < 0.00001), as well as greater odds of a low birth weight (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.27-1.48, p < 0.00001) and small-for-gestational-age infants in this group (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.63-2.00, p < 0.00001). In contrast, frozen embryo transfer can result in macrosomic (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54-0.65, p < 0.00001) or large-for-gestational-age infants (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.69, p < 0.00001). No significant difference was observed regarding congenital malformations or neonatal death rates. Conclusions: This systematic review confirmed that singleton babies conceived by frozen embryo transfer are at lower risk of preterm delivery, low birthweight and being small for gestational age than their counterparts conceived by fresh embryo transfer. The data support embryo cryopreservation but suggest that elective freezing should be limited to cases with a proven indication or within the framework of a clinical study.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles [J].
Aflatoonian, Abbas ;
Moghaddam, Fatemeh Mansoori ;
Mashayekhy, Mehri ;
Mohamadian, Farnaz .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2010, 27 (12) :695-700
[2]  
Aflatoonian A, 2016, INT J REPROD BIOMED, V14, P167
[3]   Long-Term Effects of ART on the Health of the Offspring [J].
Ahmadi, Hamid ;
Aghebati-Maleki, Leili ;
Rashidiani, Shima ;
Csabai, Timea ;
Nnaemeka, Obodo Basil ;
Szekeres-Bartho, Julia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (17)
[4]  
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology, 2011, Hum Reprod, V26, P1270, DOI 10.1093/humrep/der037
[5]   Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer [J].
Belva, F. ;
Bonduelle, M. ;
Roelants, M. ;
Verheyen, G. ;
Van Landuyt, L. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (07) :1610-1620
[6]  
Carp-Veliscu A., 2019, Notiuni de Reproducere Umana Asistata
[7]   Greater estimated fetal weight and birth weight in IVF/ICSI pregnancy after frozen-thawed vs fresh blastocyst transfer: prospective cohort study with novel unified modeling methodology [J].
Cavoretto, P., I ;
Farina, A. ;
Gaeta, G. ;
Seidenari, A. ;
Pozzoni, M. ;
Spinillo, S. ;
Morano, D. ;
Alteri, A. ;
Vigano, P. ;
Candiani, M. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 60 (01) :76-85
[8]   Uterine artery Doppler in singleton pregnancies conceived afterin-vitrofertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection with freshvsfrozen blastocyst transfer: longitudinal cohort study [J].
Cavoretto, P. I. ;
Farina, A. ;
Gaeta, G. ;
Sigismondi, C. ;
Spinillo, S. ;
Casiero, D. ;
Pozzoni, M. ;
Vigano, P. ;
Papaleo, E. ;
Candiani, M. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 56 (04) :603-610
[9]  
Chauhan SP, 2017, OBSTET GYNECOL, V130, P511, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0000000000002199, 10.1097/aog.0000000000002199]
[10]   Pregnancy Outcomes after Frozen Embryo Transfer and Fresh Embryo Transfer in Women of Advanced Maternal Age: Single-Center Experience [J].
Chen, Yao ;
Zhou, Jianbo ;
Chen, Yandong ;
Yang, Jihong ;
Hao, Yingying ;
Feng, Ting ;
Feng, Ruizhi ;
Qian, Yun .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (21)