Clinical-imaging metrics for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions

被引:0
作者
Kang, Zhen [1 ,6 ]
Margolis, Daniel J. [2 ]
Tian, Ye [3 ]
Li, Qiubai [4 ]
Wang, Shaogang [5 ]
Wang, Liang [6 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Radiol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] New York Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Med, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
[3] Capital Med Univ, Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hosp Cleveland Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Urol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[6] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Friendship Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostate cancer; Clinically significant prostate cancer; PI-RADS; 3; Coefficient of variation; Apparent diffusion coefficient; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; DENSITY; GRADE; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore the feasibility and efficacy of clinical-imaging metrics in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) category 3 lesions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on lesions diagnosed as PI-RADS 3. They were categorized into benign, non-csPCa and csPCa groups. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), T2-weighted imaging signal intensity (T2WISI), coefficient of variation of ADC and T2WISI, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), ADC density (ADCD), prostate-specific antigen lesion volume density (PSAVD) and ADC lesion volume density (ADCVD) were measured and calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with PCa and csPCa. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and decision curves were utilized to assess the efficacy and net benefit of independent risk factors. Results: Among 202 patients, 133 had benign prostate disease, 25 non-csPCa and 44 csPCa. Age, PSA and lesion location showed no significant differences (P> 0.05) among the groups. T2WISI and coefficient of variation of ADC (ADCcv) were independent risk factors for PCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68. ADC was an independent risk factor for csPCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions, yielding an AUC of 0.65. Decision curve analysis showed net benefit for patients at certain probability thresholds. Conclusions: T2WISI and ADCcv, along with ADC, respectively showed considerable promise in enhancing the diagnosis of PCa and csPCa in PI-RADS 3lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:371e1 / 371e10
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI in PI-RADS category 3 peripheral zone lesions: preliminary study evaluating DCE-MRI as an imaging biomarker for detection of clinically significant prostate cancers [J].
Abreu-Gomez, Jorge ;
Lim, Christopher ;
Cron, Gregory O. ;
Krishna, Satheesh ;
Sadoughi, Nima ;
Schieda, Nicola .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (09) :4370-4380
[2]   Strategy for Prostate Cancer Patients with Low Prostate Specific Antigen Level (2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL) [J].
Chung, Jae Hoon ;
Yu, Jiwoong ;
Song, Wan ;
Kang, Minyong ;
Sung, Hyun Hwan ;
Jeon, Hwang Gyun ;
Jeong, Byong Chang ;
Seo, Seong Il ;
Lee, Hyun Moo ;
Jeon, Seong Soo .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 35 (41)
[3]   The prostate health index (PHI) density: Are there advantages over PHI or over the prostate-specific antigen density? [J].
Garrido, Manuel M. ;
Ribeiro, Ruy M. ;
Pinheiro, Luis C. ;
Holdenrieder, Stefan ;
Guimaraes, Joao T. .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2021, 520 :133-138
[4]   Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer [J].
Gupta, Rajan T. ;
Kauffman, Christopher R. ;
Garcia-Reyes, Kirema ;
Palmeri, Mark L. ;
Madden, John F. ;
Polascik, Thomas J. ;
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (02) :331-336
[5]   Feasibility of Novel Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting of the Prostate Gland: Phantom and Clinical Studies [J].
Han, Dongyeob ;
Choi, Moon Hyung ;
Lee, Young Joon ;
Kim, Dong Hyun .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (08) :1332-1340
[6]   Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2): a pictorial review [J].
Hassanzadeh, Elmira ;
Glazer, Daniel I. ;
Dunne, Ruth M. ;
Fennessy, Fiona M. ;
Harisinghani, Mukesh G. ;
Tempany, Clare M. .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (01) :278-289
[7]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal PI-RADS 3 Lesions [J].
Hectors, Stefanie J. ;
Chen, Christine ;
Chen, Johnson ;
Wang, Jade ;
Gordon, Sharon ;
Yu, Miko ;
Al Hussein Al Awamlh, Bashir ;
Sabuncu, Mert R. ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Hu, Jim C. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 54 (05) :1466-1473
[8]   Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center [J].
Hermie, Isabeau ;
Van Besien, Jeroen ;
De Visschere, Pieter ;
Lumen, Nicolaas ;
Decaestecker, Karel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 114 :92-98
[9]   Assessing the Clinical Impact of Risk Prediction Models With Decision Curves: Guidance for Correct Interpretation and Appropriate Use [J].
Kerr, Kathleen F. ;
Brown, Marshall D. ;
Zhu, Kehao ;
Janes, Holly .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (21) :2534-+
[10]   Comparison of PSA density and lesion volume strategies for selecting men with equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions on bpMRI for biopsies [J].
Kortenbach, Karen-Cecilie ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Thomsen, Henrik S. ;
Boesen, Lars .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (02) :688-693