Reducing Privacy of CoinJoin Transactions: Quantitative Bitcoin Network Analysis

被引:0
作者
Wahrstaetter, Anton [1 ]
Taudes, Alfred [1 ]
Svetinovic, Davor [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Dept Informat Syst & Operat Management, A-1020 Vienna, Austria
[2] Khalifa Univ, Ctr Secure Cyber Phys Syst, Dept Comp Sci, Abu Dhabi 127788, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Bitcoin; blockchain; anonymity; privacy; GRAPH;
D O I
10.1109/TDSC.2024.3353803
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Privacy within the Bitcoin ecosystem has been critical for the operation and propagation of the system since its very first release. While various entities have sought to deanonymize and reveal user identities, the default semi-anonymous approach to privacy was judged as insufficient and the community developed a number of advanced privacy-preservation mechanisms. In this study, we propose an improved variant of the multiple-input clustering approach that incorporates advanced privacy-enhancing techniques. We examine the CoinJoin-adjusted user graph of Bitcoin through quantitative network analysis and draw conclusions on the effectiveness of our proposed clustering method compared to naive multiple-input clustering. Our findings indicate that CoinJoin transactions can significantly distort commonly applied address clustering approaches. Moreover, we demonstrate that Bitcoin's user graph has become less dense in recent years, concurrent with the collapse of several independent user clusters. Our results contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of privacy aspects in the Bitcoin transaction network and lay the groundwork for developing enhanced measures to prevent money laundering and terrorism financing.
引用
收藏
页码:4543 / 4558
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] The Anti-Social System Properties: Bitcoin Network Data Analysis
    Alqassem, Israa
    Rahwan, Iyad
    Svetinovic, Davor
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2020, 50 (01): : 21 - 31
  • [2] Androulaki Elli, 2013, P 17 INT C FIN CRYPT, P34, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-39884-1
  • [3] Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data
    Clauset, Aaron
    Shalizi, Cosma Rohilla
    Newman, M. E. J.
    [J]. SIAM REVIEW, 2009, 51 (04) : 661 - 703
  • [4] Leveraging the Users Graph and Trustful Transactions for the Analysis of Bitcoin Price
    Crowcroft, Jon
    Maesa, Damiano Di Francesco
    Magrini, Alessandro
    Marino, Andrea
    Ricci, Laura
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 8 (02): : 1338 - 1352
  • [5] Automatic Bitcoin Address Clustering
    Ermilov, Dmitry
    Panov, Maxim
    Yanovich, Yury
    [J]. 2017 16TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS (ICMLA), 2017, : 461 - 466
  • [6] Ficsor A, 2020, Dumplings
  • [7] Ficsor A., 2017, Zerolink the Bitcoin Fungibility Framework
  • [8] Safeguarding the evidential value of forensic cryptocurrency investigations
    Froewis, Michael
    Gottschalk, Thilo
    Haslhofer, Bernhard
    Rueckert, Christian
    Pesch, Paulina
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-DIGITAL INVESTIGATION, 2020, 33
  • [9] Harrigan Martin, 2016 INT IEEE C UBIQ
  • [10] Haslhofer B., Graphsense tagpacks