Planned Subtotal Resection following Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Koos 3 and 4 Vestibular Schwannomas

被引:1
|
作者
Turek, Grzegorz [1 ]
Dzierzecki, Sebastian [2 ]
Obierzynski, Pawel [1 ]
Drozdz, Adrian [1 ,3 ]
Mariak, Zenon [4 ]
Zielinska-Turek, Justyna [5 ]
Czyzewski, Wojciech [6 ,7 ]
Dzaman, Karolina [8 ]
Zabek, Miroslaw [1 ,2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Brodnowski Masovian Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, PL-03242 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Gamma Knife Ctr, PL-03242 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Med Univ Warsaw, Ctr Biostruct Res, Dept Descript & Clin Anat, PL-02004 Warsaw, Poland
[4] Med Univ Bialystok, Dept Neurosurg, PL-15276 Bialystok, Poland
[5] Minist Interior & Adm, Natl Med Inst, Dept Neurol, PL-02507 Warsaw, Poland
[6] Mar Sklodowska Curie Natl Res Inst Oncol, Dept Neurosurg, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
[7] Med Univ Lublin, Dept Didact & Med Simulat, PL-20954 Lublin, Poland
[8] Ctr Postgrad Med Educ, Dept Otolaryngol, PL-03242 Warsaw, Poland
[9] Ctr Postgrad Med Educ, Dept Neurosurg, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
large vestibular schwannoma; gamma knife surgery; microsurgery; subtotal resection; facial nerve preservation; GAMMA-KNIFE RADIOSURGERY; FACIAL-NERVE OUTCOMES; ACOUSTIC NEUROMAS; TUMOR-CONTROL; SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; EXPANSION; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13144107
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Surgical resection of medium to large vestibular schwannomas (VSs, Koos grade 3 and 4) is a widely used approach, although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly proposed as initial treatment. The quality of life-centered approach is challenged in cases where tumor growth control cannot be achieved with SRS, thus necessitating salvage surgery. We present a series of eight consecutive patients who required surgery due to continued tumor growth after SRS. Methods: Of the 146 patients with VS grades 3 and 4 initially treated with SRS, only eight patients (mean age, 54 +/- 7.2 years; range, 42-63 years) required subsequent surgery. Their mean tumor volume was 9.9 +/- 3.2 cm3. The mean time from SRS to first tumor progression and planned subtotal resection was 23 +/- 5.9 months and 45 +/- 17.5 months, respectively. SRS was not performed after the surgery in favor of a "wait and rescan" approach. Tumor residue was monitored on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging. In all patients, tumor growth control after planned subtotal resection was maintained at 63 +/- 19.8 months. Results: None of the 146 patients had serious complications after SRS. In the eight patients who required surgery, tumor growth between 22% and 212% (mean, 4 cm3) was reported within 26 to 84 months after SRS. Before salvage surgery, they scored 1 point on the House-Brackmann scale. Subtotal excision was performed, and VIIth nerve function was preserved in all patients. At 63 +/- 19.8 months, 3 patients had a House-Brackmann score of 1, four patients had a score of 2, and one patient had a score of 3. Conclusions: Surgical excision of medium to large VS after SRS can be relatively safe, provided that a quality of life-centered approach of subtotal resection is used.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Role of radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of vestibular schwannomas
    Regis, J.
    Carron, R.
    Moucharrafien, S.
    Delsantin, C.
    Porcheron, D.
    Thomassin, J-M
    Murracciole, X.
    Roche, P. -H.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2012, 16 : S70 - S78
  • [12] Surgical and radiosurgical outcomes for Koos grade 3 vestibular schwannomas
    Kamogawa, Misaki
    Tanino, Shin
    Miyahara, Kosuke
    Shuto, Takashi
    Matsunaga, Shigeo
    Okada, Tomu
    Noda, Naoyuki
    Sekiguchi, Noriaki
    Suzuki, Koji
    Tanaka, Yusuke
    Uriu, Yasuhiro
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2024, 47 (01)
  • [13] Gamma Knife radiosurgery following subtotal resection of vestibular schwannoma
    Brokinkel, Benjamin
    Sauerland, Cristina
    Holling, Markus
    Ewelt, Christian
    Horstmann, Gerhard
    van Eck, Albertus T. C. J.
    Stummer, Walter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (12) : 2077 - 2082
  • [14] Tumor Control Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Vestibular Schwannomas - A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Santa Maria, Peter L.
    Shi, Yangyang
    Aaron, Ksenia A.
    Gurgel, Richard K.
    Corrales, C. Eduardo
    Soltys, Scott G.
    Santa Maria, Chloe
    Chang, Steven D.
    Blevins, Nikolas H.
    Jackler, Robert K.
    Gibbs, Iris C.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (10) : E1548 - E1559
  • [15] Outcome and toxicity analysis of single dose stereotactic radiosurgery in vestibular schwannoma based on the Koos grading system
    Ruess, Daniel
    Poehlmann, Lea
    Grau, Stefan
    Hamisch, Christina
    Hoevels, Mauritius
    Treuer, Harald
    Baues, Christian
    Kocher, Martin
    Ruge, Maximillian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [16] Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cystic Vestibular Schwannomas
    Frisch, Christopher D.
    Jacob, Jeffrey T.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Foote, Robert L.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    Neff, Brian A.
    Pollock, Bruce E.
    Link, Michael J.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (01) : 112 - 118
  • [17] Safety and Efficacy of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for the Management of Koos Grade 4 Vestibular Schwannomas COMMENTS
    Goel, Atul
    Blamek, Slawomir
    Kondziolka, Douglas
    Teo, Mario
    Chang, Steven D.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 78 (04) : 528 - 530
  • [18] Stereotactic radiosurgery for Koos grade IV vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Szymoniuk, Michal
    Kochanski, Marek
    Wilk, Karolina
    Miazga, Dominika
    Kanonik, Oliwia
    Dryla, Aleksandra
    Kamieniak, Piotr
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2024, 166 (01)
  • [19] Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery in young adults with vestibular schwannomas
    Kawashima, Mariko
    Hasegawa, Hirotaka
    Shin, Masahiro
    Shinya, Yuki
    Katano, Atsuto
    Saito, Nobuhito
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 154 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [20] Safety and Efficacy of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for the Management of Koos Grade 4 Vestibular Schwannomas
    Iorio-Morin, Christian
    AlSubaie, Fahd
    Mathieu, David
    NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 78 (04) : 521 - 528