Protocol for a randomised trial of a self-directed digital pain management intervention (Empowered Relief) tailored to adults with chronic pain and prescription opioid misuse/disorder: the MOBILE Relief study

被引:1
|
作者
Edwards, Karlyn A. [1 ]
Palenski, Paige [1 ]
Perez, Luzmercy [1 ]
You, Dokyoung Sophia [1 ]
Ziadni, Maisa S. [1 ]
Jung, Corinne [1 ]
Adair, Emma [1 ]
Tian, Lu [1 ]
Mackey, Sean C. [1 ]
Darnall, Beth D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Stanford, CA USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 08期
关键词
Chronic Pain; Telemedicine; Substance misuse; Behavior; Psychosocial Intervention; Cognition; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; CATASTROPHIZING SCALE; UNITED-STATES; INTENSITY; MISUSE; PREDICTORS; DEPRESSION; MEDIATORS; RECOVERY; OVERDOSE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086889
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Chronic pain increases the risk of prescription opioid misuse or opioid use disorder (OUD). Non-pharmacological treatments are needed to dually address pain and opioid risks. The purpose of the Mobile and Online-Based Interventions to Lessen Pain (MOBILE Relief) study is to compare a one-session, video-based, on-demand digital pain relief skills intervention for chronic pain ('Empowered Relief' (ER); tailored to people at risk for opioid misuse or with opioid misuse/OUD) to a one-session digital health education intervention ('Living Better'; no pain management skills).Methods and analysis MOBILE Relief is an international online randomised controlled clinical trial. Study participants are adults with chronic, non-cancer pain (>= 6 months) with daily pain intensity >= 3/10, taking >= 10 morphine equivalent daily dose and score >= 6 on the Current Opioid Misuse Measure. Participants are recruited through clinician referrals and clinic advertisements. Study procedures include electronic eligibility screening, informed consent, automated 1:1 randomisation to the treatment group, baseline measures, receipt of assigned digital treatment and six post-treatment surveys spanning 3 months. Study staff will call participants at baseline and 1-month and 3 months post-treatment to verify the opioid prescription. The main statistical analyses will include analysis of covariance and mixed effects model for repeated measurements regression.Main outcomes Primary outcomes are self-reported pain catastrophising, pain intensity, pain interference, opioid craving and opioid misuse at 1-month and 3 months post-treatment. We will determine the feasibility of ER (>= 50% participant engagement, >= 70% treatment appraisal ratings). We hypothesise the ER group will be superior to the Living Better group in the reduction of multiprimary pain outcomes at 1-month post-treatment and opioid outcomes at 1-month and 3 months post-treatment.Ethics and dissemination The study protocol was approved by the Stanford University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB 61643). We will publish results in peer-reviewed journals; National Institute of Drug Abuse (funder) and MOBILE Relief participants will receive result summaries.Trial registration number NCT05152134.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] A community health worker-delivered intervention (STEPS) to support chronic pain self-management among older adults in an underserved urban community: protocol for a randomized trial
    Mary R. Janevic
    Rebecca Lindsay
    Elizabeth Brines
    Kimberlydawn Wisdom
    Sheria G. Robinson-Lane
    Robin Brewer
    Susan L. Murphy
    John Piette
    Leslie Grijalva
    Michael Anderson
    Jaye Clement
    Courtney Latimer
    Trials, 26 (1)
  • [22] Exercise and self-management for people with chronic knee, hip or lower back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness. Study protocol
    Walsh, Nicola
    Cramp, Fiona
    Palmer, Shea
    Pollock, Jon
    Hampson, Lisa
    Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
    Green, Colin
    Jones, Louise
    Phillips, Sonia
    Johnson, Liz
    Hurley, Mike
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2013, 99 (04) : 352 - 357
  • [23] Comparing the Effectiveness of Education Versus Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: Protocol for the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Real-time Pain Management Intervention for Sickle Cell via Mobile Applications (CaRISMA) Study
    Badawy, Sherif M.
    Abebe, Kaleab Z.
    Reichman, Charlotte A.
    Checo, Grace
    Hamm, Megan E.
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Lalloo, Chitra
    Carroll, Patrick
    Saraf, Santosh L.
    Gordeuk, Victor R.
    Desai, Payal
    Shah, Nirmish
    Liles, Darla
    Trimnell, Cassandra
    Jonassaint, Charles R.
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (05):
  • [24] Comparing the clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention with a waiting list control among adults with chronic pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Hayes, Sara
    Hogan, Michael
    Dowd, Haulie
    Doherty, Edel
    O'Higgins, Siobhan
    Gabhainn, Saoirse Nic
    MacNeela, Padraig
    Murphy, Andrew W.
    Kropmans, Thomas
    O'Neill, Ciaran
    Newell, John
    McGuire, Brian E.
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (07):