Advancing Ki67 hotspot detection in breast cancer: a comparative analysis of automated digital image analysis algorithms

被引:0
作者
Zwager, Mieke C. [1 ]
Yu, Shibo [1 ]
Buikema, Henk J. [1 ]
de Bock, Geertruida H. [2 ]
Ramsing, Thomas W. [3 ]
Thagaard, Jeppe [3 ]
Koopman, Timco [1 ,4 ]
van Der Vegt, Bert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pathol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Visiopharm, Horsholm, Denmark
[4] Pathol Friesland, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
关键词
artificial intelligence (AI); breast cancer; digital image analysis (DIA); hotspot; Ki67 proliferation index; INTERNATIONAL KI67; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; PROLIFERATION; HETEROGENEITY; VALIDATION; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1111/his.15294
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
AimManual detection and scoring of Ki67 hotspots is difficult and prone to variability, limiting its clinical utility. Automated hotspot detection and scoring by digital image analysis (DIA) could improve the assessment of the Ki67 hotspot proliferation index (PI). This study compared the clinical performance of Ki67 hotspot detection and scoring DIA algorithms based on virtual dual staining (VDS) and deep learning (DL) with manual Ki67 hotspot PI assessment.MethodsTissue sections of 135 consecutive invasive breast carcinomas were immunohistochemically stained for Ki67. Two DIA algorithms, based on VDS and DL, automatically determined the Ki67 hotspot PI. For manual assessment; two independent observers detected hotspots and calculated scores using a validated scoring protocol.ResultsAutomated hotspot detection and assessment by VDS and DL could be performed in 73% and 100% of the cases, respectively. Automated hotspot detection by VDS and DL led to higher Ki67 hotspot PIs (mean 39.6% and 38.3%, respectively) compared to manual consensus Ki67 PIs (mean 28.8%). Comparing manual consensus Ki67 PIs with VDS Ki67 PIs revealed substantial correlation (r = 0.90), while manual consensus versus DL Ki67 PIs demonstrated high correlation (r = 0.95).ConclusionAutomated Ki67 hotspot detection and analysis correlated strongly with manual Ki67 assessment and provided higher PIs compared to manual assessment. The DL-based algorithm outperformed the VDS-based algorithm in clinical applicability, because it did not depend on virtual alignment of slides and correlated stronger with manual scores. Use of a DL-based algorithm may allow clearer Ki67 PI cutoff values, thereby improving the clinical usability of Ki67. Manual assessment of Ki67 hotspots is difficult and prone to variability. Automated Ki67 hotspot assessment correlated strongly with manual Ki67 assessment and provided higher Ki67 PIs. DL-based automated Ki67 assessment has high clinical applicability, because it does not depend on virtual alignment of slides and correlates strongly with manual scoring. image
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 213
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison between Ki67 labeling index determined using image analysis software with virtual slide system and that determined visually in breast cancer
    Maeda, Ichiro
    Abe, Kayoko
    Koizumi, Hirotaka
    Nakajima, Chika
    Tajima, Shinya
    Aoki, Hiromi
    Tsuchiya, Junichi
    Tsuchiya, Seiko
    Tsuchiya, Kyoko
    Shimo, Arata
    Tsugawa, Koichiro
    Ueno, Takahiko
    Tatsunami, Shinobu
    Takagi, Masayuki
    BREAST CANCER, 2016, 23 (05) : 745 - 751
  • [32] An Advanced Automated Image Analysis Model for Scoring of ER, PR, HER-2 and Ki-67 in Breast Carcinoma
    Feng, Min
    Chen, Jie
    Xiang, Xuhui
    Deng, Yang
    Zhou, Yanyan
    Zhang, Zhang
    Zheng, Zhongxi
    Bao, Ji
    Bu, Hong
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 108441 - 108451
  • [33] Digital Image Analysis of the Proliferation Markers Ki67 and Phosphohistone H3 in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Accuracy of Grading Compared With Routine Manual Hot Spot Evaluation of the Ki67 Index
    Lea, Dordi
    Gudlaugsson, Einar G.
    Skaland, Ivar
    Lillesand, Melinda
    Soreide, Kjetil
    Soreide, Jon A.
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2021, 29 (07) : 499 - 505
  • [34] Basal Ki67 expression measured by digital image analysis is optimal for prognostication in oral squamous cell carcinoma
    Klimowicz, Alexander C.
    Bose, Pinaki
    Nakoneshny, Steven C.
    Dean, Michelle
    Huang, Longlong
    Chandarana, Shamir
    Magliocco, Anthony M.
    Matthews, T. Wayne
    Brockton, Nigel T.
    Dort, Joseph C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (14) : 2166 - 2174
  • [35] Flow cytometric analysis for Ki67 assessment in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue
    Sato, Natsuki
    Tsujimoto, Masahiko
    Nakatsuji, Masatoshi
    Tsuji, Hiromi
    Sugama, Yuji
    Shimazu, Kenzo
    Shimoda, Masafumi
    Ishihara, Hideki
    BMC BIOLOGY, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [36] Inverse relationship between Ki67 and survival in early luminal breast cancer: confirmation in a multivariate analysis
    Gallardo, Alberto
    Garcia-Valdecasas, Barbara
    Murata, Paola
    Teran, Rolando
    Lopez, Laura
    Barnadas, Agusti
    Lerma, Enrique
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 167 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [37] Brief fixation does not hamper the reliability of Ki67 analysis in breast cancer core-needle biopsies: a double-centre study
    Kalkman, Shona
    Bulte, Joris P.
    Halilovic, Altuna
    Bult, Peter
    van Diest, Paul J.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2015, 66 (03) : 380 - 387
  • [38] Reliability of Ki67 visual scoring app compared to eyeball estimate and digital image analysis and its prognostic significance in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
    Arun, Indu
    Venkatesh, Saranya
    Ahmed, Rosina
    Agrawal, Sanjit Kumar
    Leung, Samuel C. Y.
    APMIS, 2021, 129 (08) : 489 - 502
  • [39] Comparison of digital image analysis and visual scoring of KI-67 in prostate cancer prognosis after prostatectomy
    Desmeules, Patrice
    Hovington, Helene
    Nguile-Makao, Moliere
    Leger, Caroline
    Caron, Andre
    Lacombe, Louis
    Fradet, Yves
    Tetu, Bernard
    Fradet, Vincent
    DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2015, 10
  • [40] Ki-67 Proliferation Index Assessment in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors by Digital Image Analysis With Stringent Case and Hotspot Level Concordance Requirements
    Boukhar, Sarag A.
    Gosse, Matthew D.
    Bellizzi, Andrew M.
    Rajan, Anand
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 156 (04) : 607 - 619