Transcendental idealism and Kant's reconciliation of determinism and libertarianism

Kant famously argues that transcendental idealism allows us to solve the problem of free will. The basic outlines of the solution are as follows: while freedom and determinism are incompatible, we can consistently predicate them of one and the same being if we take the former to be a quality of the human being as it is in itself and the latter a quality of the human being as it appears. In this paper, I look at three different readings of transcendental idealism-the two-object reading, the two-property reading, and the epistemological reading-and argue that none of them-at least in their standard forms-are able to make sense of this solution. I then draw on my alternative, semantic reading of transcendental idealism to propose a new way of understanding Kant's solution.