Bryophytes in managed lowland forests of Slovakia (Central Europe): looking into species diversity across different forest types

被引:0
作者
Misikova, Katarina [1 ]
Misik, Miroslav [2 ]
机构
[1] Comenius Univ, Fac Nat Sci, Dept Bot, Revova 39, Bratislava 81102, Slovakia
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Canc Res, Borschkegasse 8a, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Species richness; Biodiversity; Substrate; Mosses; Epiphytes; Woodland; EPIPHYTIC BRYOPHYTES; TEMPERATE FORESTS; COMMUNITIES; LICHENS; FRAGMENTATION; ASSEMBLAGES; RICHNESS; TRAITS; TREE;
D O I
10.1007/s10531-024-02946-2
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The majority of the woodland area in Central Europe is composed of managed forests. Although the species diversity and composition, particularly in older forests, may be similar to those of natural or close-to-nature forests, intensive forestry and other human activities have adverse impacts on biodiversity. The present study focused on bryophyte diversity in managed lowland forests, as these have received less attention compared to other types of forests. Our research targeted the area located within the Borsk & aacute; n & iacute;& zcaron;ina Lowland in south-western Slovakia. In total, 37 forest sampling plots (SPs) were selected, representing five different forest types, namely Quercus, Fraxinus, Robinia, Pinus, and mixed forests. Multivariate statistical analyses were conducted across these forest types to demonstrate variations in bryophyte species richness, composition, and functional traits. Overall, 60 species of bryophytes were identified, of which five were liverworts and 55 were mosses. Epiphytes were the most abundant substrate group in deciduous and mixed stands, while epigeic species prevailed in Pinus forests. Considering environmental factors, the bryophyte diversity was influenced mostly by the forest type and area size of SPs. Clear differences in species composition were observed when comparing coniferous and deciduous stands, as well as non-native Robinia forests and native tree stands. Overall, intensive forest management results in a high concentration of hemerophilous and nitrophilous species, along with the absence of rare and threatened mosses and liverworts. Nevertheless, by adhering to proper management methods, even managed forests can provide suitable habitats for various bryophytes.
引用
收藏
页码:4195 / 4213
页数:19
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance
    Anderson, MJ
    [J]. AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2001, 26 (01) : 32 - 46
  • [2] Anderson MJ, 2017, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, P1, DOI [10.1002/9781118445112.stat07841, DOI 10.1002/9781118445112.STAT07841]
  • [3] Is 'life-form' a useful concept in bryophyte ecology?
    Bates, JW
    [J]. OIKOS, 1998, 82 (02) : 223 - 237
  • [4] Investigation of the bryophyte flora of strict forest reserves (Naturwaldzellen) in Saxony - Part 2: Rungstock
    Baumann, Martin
    [J]. HERZOGIA, 2023, 36 (01) : 169 - 192
  • [5] Recolonization of epiphytic bryophytes after decades of air pollution in forest ecosystems in the Erzgebirge (Ore Mountains) shows the importance of deciduous trees for the diversity of this species group
    Baumann, Martin
    Dittrich, Sebastian
    von Oheimb, Goddert
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 509
  • [6] BryForTrait - A life-history trait database of forest bryophytes
    Bernhardt-Roemermann, Markus
    Poschlod, Peter
    Hentschel, Joern
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2018, 29 (04) : 798 - 800
  • [7] Predictive mapping of bryophyte diversity associated with mature forests using LiDAR-derived indices in a strongly managed landscape
    Bourgouin, Maurane
    Valeria, Osvaldo
    Fenton, Nicole J.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 136
  • [8] Bozanic B, 2013, ACTA ZOOL BULGAR, V65, P197
  • [9] Brusa G., 2021, Borziana, V2, P125, DOI 10.7320/Borz.002.125
  • [10] Long-term changes in bryophyte diversity of central European managed forests depending on site environmental features
    Cacciatori, Cecilia
    Czerepko, Janusz
    Lech, Pawel
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2022, 31 (11) : 2657 - 2681