Effects of out-of-plane stiffness and inelastic behavior of diaphragms on the behavior of SSTF systems

被引:0
作者
Li, Zexiang [1 ,2 ]
Gan, Dan [2 ]
Li, Yang [2 ]
Zhou, Xuhong [2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Geomat, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Steel staggered truss framing system; Diaphragm action; Multi-layered shell element; Steel moment frame; Out-of-plane stiffness of slab; FRAMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118914
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The design and analysis methodologies for steel staggered truss framing (SSTF) systems commonly employ the rigid diaphragm assumption which neglects the out-of-plane stiffness and inelastic behavior of diaphragms. This results in erroneous predictions of yielding mechanisms and overly underestimated predictions of base shear forces. In this work, seismic response analyses and nonlinear pushover analyses were performed on an 8-story SSTF structure and a reference steel moment framing structure incorporating distinct diaphragm modelling methods utilizing rigid membrane elements, homogeneous shell elements, and multi-layered shell elements, respectively. Comparative analyses of the obtained natural periods, base shears, story drifts, and yielding mechanisms revealed that the out-of-plane stiffness of diaphragms significantly contributes to the lateral stiffness of SSTF systems in the direction parallel to trusses, and the inelastic behavior of diaphragm affected the failure modes of SSTF systems. Lastly, the diaphragm actions on SSTF systems were further verified by comparing the experimental results of a tested 1/3-scale SSTF specimen and the analysis results of the counterpart analysis model with the distinct diaphragm modelling methods. Design considerations about the diaphragm modelling were given, which facilitates acquiring the precise predictions of the lateral responses and yielding mechanisms of SSTF systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction), 2002, Steel design guide series 14: staggered truss framing systema
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, FEMA 440 Report
  • [4] Numerical simulation of seismic collapse mechanisms of vertically irregular steel high-rise buildings
    Azghandi, Reza Ramezani
    Shakib, Hamzeh
    Zakersalehi, Maedeh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2020, 166
  • [5] Brazil A, 2000, Mod Steel Constr, V40, P32
  • [6] Full-Scale Testing and Design of Special Truss Moment Frames for High-Seismic Areas
    Chao, Shih-Ho
    Jiansinlapadamrong, Chatchai
    Simasathien, Sanputt
    Okazaki, Taichiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (03)
  • [7] Influence of steel-concrete interaction in dissipative zones of frames: I - Experimental study
    Ciutina, Adrian
    Dubina, Dan
    Danku, Gelu
    [J]. STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2013, 15 (03) : 299 - 322
  • [8] Mechanism and Experimental Validation of Frictional Steel Truss Coupling Beams
    Cui, Yao
    Tang, Qi
    Wu, Tianjiao
    Okazaki, Taichiro
    Wang, Tao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 148 (09)
  • [9] Seismic behavior of steel space truss connections to reinforced concrete supporting columns
    Cui, Yao
    Yang, Xinyan
    Liu, Hongtao
    Yamada, Satoshi
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 25 (08) : 1714 - 1729
  • [10] COLLAPSE BEHAVIOR OF PINO-SUAREZ BUILDING DURING 1985 MEXICO-CITY EARTHQUAKE
    GER, JF
    CHENG, FY
    LU, LW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1993, 119 (03): : 852 - 870