Balancing the nexus of beef sustainability: a best-worst scaling approach to inform policy decisions

被引:0
作者
Osman, Eliyasu Y. [1 ]
Schroeder, Ted C. [1 ]
Lancaster, Phillip A. [2 ]
White, Brad J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Beef Cattle Inst, Manhattan, KS USA
关键词
Affordability; beef sustainability; best-worst scaling; consumer preferences; policy; Q18; Q13; Q11; ANIMAL-WELFARE; PREFERENCES; PERCEPTIONS; IMPACTS; MODELS; CARE;
D O I
10.1017/age.2024.7
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The beef industry is facing increasing pressure to adopt sustainable practices, driven by environmental, economic, and social concerns. Designing effective policies that satisfy industry demands while aligning with public interests is a complex challenge. Using a nationally representative survey of 3,001 U.S. residents, we employ a best-worst scaling approach to assess preferences for nine beef sustainability policies. Results reveal consumers prioritize affordability of beef products and welfare of cattle as most important sustainability policies. Conversely, policies addressing greenhouse gas emissions from cattle production are least important, with less than 6% of respondents preferring them.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 453
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   A formal and empirical comparison of two score measures for best-worst scaling [J].
Marley, A. A. J. ;
Islam, T. ;
Hawkins, G. E. .
JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2016, 21 :15-24
[42]   Feasibility of a best-worst scaling exercise to set priorities for autism research [J].
Davis, Scott A. ;
Howard, Kirsten ;
Ellis, Alan R. ;
Jonas, Daniel E. ;
Carey, Timothy S. ;
Morrissey, Joseph P. ;
Thomas, Kathleen C. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2022, 25 (04) :1643-1651
[43]   An examination of help-seeking preferences via best-worst scaling [J].
Lannin, Daniel G. ;
Barrowclough, Michael ;
Vogel, David L. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 76 (09) :1677-1695
[44]   The most important facilitators and barriers to the use of Health Technology Assessment in Canada: a best-worst scaling approach [J].
Wranik, Wieslawa Dominika ;
Szekely, Ronaldo-Raul ;
Mayer, Susanne ;
Hiligsmann, Mickael ;
Cheung, Kei Long .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 24 (01) :846-856
[45]   Consumers' preferences for processed meat: a best-worst scaling approach in three European countries [J].
Torok, Aron ;
Yeh, Ching-Hua ;
Menozzi, Davide ;
Balogh, Peter ;
Czine, Peter .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD ECONOMICS, 2023, 11 (01)
[46]   Consumers' Preferences for Wine Attributes: A Best-Worst Scaling Analysis [J].
Stanco, Marcello ;
Lerro, Marco ;
Marotta, Giuseppe .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (07) :1-11
[47]   Valuation of sustainable attributes of hard apple cider: A best-worst choice approach [J].
Smith, Meghann ;
Lal, Pankaj ;
Oluoch, Sydney ;
Vedwan, Neeraj ;
Smith, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 318
[48]   Energy policy trade-offs in Poland: A best-worst scaling discrete choice experiment [J].
Aruga, Kentaka ;
Bolt, Timothy ;
Pest, Przemyslaw .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 156
[49]   An R package and tutorial for case 2 best-worst scaling [J].
Aizaki, Hideo ;
Fogarty, James .
JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2019, 32
[50]   Exploring the use of best-worst scaling to elicit course experience questionnaire responses [J].
Huybers, Twan .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (08) :1306-1318