Balancing the nexus of beef sustainability: a best-worst scaling approach to inform policy decisions

被引:0
|
作者
Osman, Eliyasu Y. [1 ]
Schroeder, Ted C. [1 ]
Lancaster, Phillip A. [2 ]
White, Brad J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Beef Cattle Inst, Manhattan, KS USA
关键词
Affordability; beef sustainability; best-worst scaling; consumer preferences; policy; Q18; Q13; Q11; ANIMAL-WELFARE; PREFERENCES; PERCEPTIONS; IMPACTS; MODELS; CARE;
D O I
10.1017/age.2024.7
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The beef industry is facing increasing pressure to adopt sustainable practices, driven by environmental, economic, and social concerns. Designing effective policies that satisfy industry demands while aligning with public interests is a complex challenge. Using a nationally representative survey of 3,001 U.S. residents, we employ a best-worst scaling approach to assess preferences for nine beef sustainability policies. Results reveal consumers prioritize affordability of beef products and welfare of cattle as most important sustainability policies. Conversely, policies addressing greenhouse gas emissions from cattle production are least important, with less than 6% of respondents preferring them.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using best-worst scaling to inform policy decisions in Africa: a literature review
    Beres, Laura K.
    Campoamor, Nicola B.
    Hawthorn, Rachael
    Mugambi, Melissa L.
    Mulabe, Musunge
    Vhlakis, Natlie
    Kabongo, Michael
    Schuster, Anne
    Bridges, John F. P.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [2] Perceived Importance of Factors in Cannabis Purchase Decisions: A Best-worst Scaling Experiment
    Zhu, Bin
    Guo, Huiying
    Cao, Ying
    An, Ruopeng
    Shi, Yuyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2021, 91
  • [3] Assessing Italians' Preferences for Mountain Beef Production Using a Best-Worst Scaling Approach
    Linder, Mikael Oliveira
    Sidali, Katia Laura
    Fischer, Christian
    Gauly, Matthias
    Busch, Gesa
    MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 42 (03) : R8 - R15
  • [4] Best-Worst Scaling with many items
    Chrzan, Keith
    Peitz, Megan
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2019, 30 : 61 - 72
  • [5] Evaluating the Inclusion of Words and/or Pictures in Best-Worst Scaling Experiments
    Bir, Courtney
    Lai, John
    Thompson, Nathanael M.
    Widmar, Nicole Olynk
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FOOD & AGRIBUSINESS MARKETING, 2022, 34 (04) : 343 - 367
  • [6] R packages and tutorial for case 1 best-worst scaling
    Aizaki, Hideo
    Fogarty, James
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2023, 46
  • [7] Chinese consumers' dish value: a best-worst scaling approach
    Wang, Erpeng
    Nian, Yefan
    Gao, Zhifeng
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2025, 127 (03): : 1153 - 1167
  • [8] Revisiting constraints to smallholder participation in high-value markets: A best-worst scaling approach
    Ola, Oreoluwa
    Menapace, Luisa
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 51 (04) : 595 - 608
  • [9] Which cultural ecosystem services is more important? A best-worst scaling approach
    Kabaya, Kei
    Hashimoto, Shizuka
    Takeuchi, Kazuhiko
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2020, 9 (03) : 304 - 318
  • [10] Consumer Preference Heterogeneity Evaluation in Fruit and Vegetable Purchasing Decisions Using the Best-Worst Approach
    Massaglia, Stefano
    Borra, Danielle
    Peano, Cristiana
    Sottile, Francesco
    Merlino, Valentina Maria
    FOODS, 2019, 8 (07)