Kuhnian Lessons for the Study of Open-Ended Evolution

被引：0
作者：
Bedau, Mark A. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Reed Coll, Dept Philosophy, Portland, OR 97202 USA
来源：
ARTIFICIAL LIFE | 2024年 / 30卷 / 03期
关键词：
Open-ended evolution (OEE); Thomas Kuhn; normal science; scientific progress; scientific paradigm; scientific exemplar;
D O I：
10.1162/artl_a_00428
中图分类号：
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号：
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要：
Kuhnian philosophy of science implies that progress in the study of open-ended evolution (OEE) would be accelerated if the OEE science community were to agree on some examples of striking success in OEE science. This article recounts the important role of scientific paradigms and scientific exemplars in creating the productivity of what Kuhn, in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, calls "normal" science, and it describes how the study of OEE today would benefit from exhibiting more of the hallmarks of normal science. The article concludes by describing five proposed projects that would help create a consensus in the OEE community on some good examples of the scientific study of OEE.
引用
收藏
页码：337 / 344
页数：8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Open problems in artificial life [J].
Bedau, MA ;
McCaskill, JS ;
Packard, NH ;
Rasmussen, S ;
Adami, C ;
Green, DG ;
Ikegami, T ;
Kaneko, K ;
Ray, TS .
ARTIFICIAL LIFE, 2000, 6 (04) :363-376
[2]   Open-Ended Technological Innovation [J].
Bedau, Mark A. ;
Gigliotti, Nicholas ;
Janssen, Tobias ;
Kosik, Alec ;
Nambiar, Ananthan ;
Packard, Norman .
ARTIFICIAL LIFE, 2019, 25 (01) :33-49
[3]  
Berkelamp E. R., 1982, Winning ways for your mathematical plays, V2
[4]  
Bird Alexander., 2022, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
[5]  
Godfrey-Smith P., 2009, THEORY REALITY INTRO
[6]   Open-Ended Evolution and a Mechanism of Novelties in Web Services [J].
Ikegami, Takashi ;
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro ;
Oka, Mizuki .
ARTIFICIAL LIFE, 2019, 25 (02) :168-177
[7]  
KUHN T, 1962, STRUCTURE SCI REVOLU
[8]  
LAKATOS I, 1963, BRIT J PHILOS SCI, V14, P1
[9]  
Longino H E., 1990, Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTVX5WBFZ
[10]  
Oreskes N., 2019, Why trust science?, DOI [10.1515/9780691189932, DOI 10.1515/9780691189932]
12