Investor attention and corporate financialization: Evidence from internet search volume

被引:6
作者
Ju, Chunhua [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Fang, Xusheng [1 ,3 ]
Shen, Zhonghua [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Modern Business Res Ctr, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Financial Coll, Ecommerce & New Consumpt Res Inst, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Business Adm, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Stat & Math, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Management Engn & Ecommerce, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
关键词
Investor attention; Corporate financialization; Information asymmetry; Investor sentiment; Heterogeneous beliefs; LIMITED ATTENTION; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS; TRADING BEHAVIOR; CASH HOLDINGS; STOCK-MARKET; US ECONOMY; RETURNS; RISK; INATTENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103576
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the relationship between investor attention and corporate financialization from a behavioral finance perspective. We use Internet search volume as a proxy for investor attention and find that investor attention is significantly and positively related to corporate financialization using a sample of listed firms in China over the period 2011-2022, and that this relationship is more pronounced in firms with higher levels of managerial myopia. A series of robustness tests still support our baseline findings, such as considering endogeneity issues, substituting core variables, and changing the model setting. We further discuss the mechanisms of influence using two-stage regressions and find that investor attention promotes corporate financialization by increasing investor sentiment as well as heterogeneous beliefs. Finally, we perform a series of heterogeneity tests and find that the positive relationship between investor attention and corporate financialization is more pronounced among firms with higher information uncertainty, small firms, firms within monopolistic industries, and firms within high-tech industries. However, this relationship is not significantly different among firms with different levels of institutional ownership. This study provides new evidence for understanding investors' behavioral biases and how investor attention affects corporate investment strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 106 条
[41]   Volume, opinion divergence, and returns: A study of post-earnings announcement drift [J].
Garfinkel, JA ;
Sokobin, J .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2006, 44 (01) :85-112
[42]   Measuring Investors' Opinion Divergence [J].
Garfinkel, Jon A. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2009, 47 (05) :1317-1348
[43]   Information Disclosure in Financial Markets [J].
Goldstein, Itay ;
Yang, Liyan .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, VOL 9, 2017, 9 :101-125
[44]   Learning and Complementarities in Speculative Attacks [J].
Goldstein, Itay ;
Ozdenoren, Emre ;
Yuan, Kathy .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2011, 78 (01) :263-292
[45]   Investor attention and ESG performance: Lessons from China's manufacturing industry [J].
Gu, Jiafeng .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 355
[46]   Firms' innovation strategy under the shadow of analyst coverage [J].
Guo, Bing ;
Perez-Castrillo, David ;
Toldra-Simats, Anna .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 131 (02) :456-483
[47]  
Han SJ, 2007, J CORP FINANC, V13, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2006.05.002
[48]   Can investor sentiment be a momentum time-series predictor? Evidence from China [J].
Han, Xing ;
Li, Youwei .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2017, 42 :212-239
[49]   Retail investor attention and corporate innovation in the big data era [J].
Hao, Jing .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 86
[50]   Retail investor attention and firms' idiosyncratic risk: Evidence from China [J].
Hao, Jing ;
Xiong, Xiong .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 74