Classification and characterization of facial asymmetry in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using cluster analysis

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Linlin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cao, Cong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ma, Ting [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Yuan [5 ]
Bi, Zhiwei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Dongxu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Cheeloo Coll Med, Dept Orthodont, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Key Lab Oral Tissue Regenerat, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Engn Lab Dent Mat & Oral Tissue Regenerat, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Prov Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[5] Shandong Univ, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Qilu Hosp, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
CRANIOFACIAL ASYMMETRY; 3-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; DENTAL COMPENSATION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; NORMAL OCCLUSION; MAXILLARY YAW; DECOMPENSATION; HYPERPLASIA; PITCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.05.012
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study aimed to analyze the comprehensive maxillofacial features of patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry to develop a classification system for diagnosis and surgical planning. Methods: A total of 161 adult patients were included, with 121 patients in the asymmetry group (menton deviation > 2 mm) and 40 patients in the symmetry group (menton deviation <= 2 mm). Twenty-eight variables were determined, including transverse translation, roll and yaw of each facial unit, transverse width, mandibular morphology, and transverse dental compensation. Principal component (PC) analysis was conducted to extract PCs, and cluster analysis was performed using these components to classify the asymmetry group. A decision tree was constructed on the basis of the clustering results. Results: Six PCs were extracted, explaining 80.622% of the data variability. The asymmetry group was classified into 4 subgroups: (1) atypical type (15.7%) showed an opposite roll direction of maxillary dentition than of menton deviation; (2) compound type (34.71%) demonstrated significant ramus height differences, maxillary roll, and mandibular roll and yaw; (3) mandibular yaw type (44.63%) showed slight mandibular yaw without mandibular morphology asymmetry; and (4) maxillary-shift type (4.96%) shared similarities with the compound type but showed significant maxillary translation. The classification and regression tree model achieved a prediction accuracy of up to 85.11%. Conclusions: This study identified 4 distinct phenotypes using cluster analysis and proposed tailored treatment recommendations on the basis of their specific characteristics. The classification results emphasized the importance of spatial displacement features, especially mandibular yaw, in diagnosing facial asymmetry. The established classification and regression tree model enables clinicians to identify patients conveniently. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2024;166:252-66)
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 266
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Pitch, roll, and yaw: Describing the spatial orientation of dentofacial traits
    Ackerman, James L.
    Proffit, William R.
    Sarver, David M.
    Ackerman, Marc B.
    Kean, Martin R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2007, 131 (03) : 305 - 310
  • [2] Transverse dental compensation in relation to sagittal and transverse skeletal discrepancies in skeletal Class III patients
    Ahn, Jaechan
    Kim, Sung-Jin
    Lee, Ji-Yeon
    Chung, Chooryung J.
    Kim, Kyung-Ho
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 151 (01) : 148 - 156
  • [3] Three-dimensional phenotype characteristics of skeletal class III malocclusion in adult Chinese: a principal component analysis-based cluster analysis
    Alshoaibi, Lina Hassan
    Alareqi, Mohammed Muneer
    Al-Somairi, Majedh Abdo Ali
    Al-Tayar, Barakat
    Almashraqi, Abeer A.
    An, Xiaoli
    Alhammadi, Maged Sultan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 27 (08) : 4173 - 4189
  • [4] Comparison of different midsagittal plane configurations for evaluating craniofacial asymmetry by expert preference
    An, Sangln
    Lee, Ji-Yeon
    Chung, Chooryung J.
    Kim, Kyung-Ho
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 152 (06) : 788 - 797
  • [5] Morphologic Evaluation and Classification of Facial Asymmetry Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography
    Baek, Chaehwan
    Paeng, Jun-Young
    Lee, Janice S.
    Hong, Jongrak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (05) : 1161 - 1169
  • [6] BISHARA SE, 1994, ANGLE ORTHOD, V64, P89
  • [7] BRUCE RA, 1968, J ORAL SURG, V26, P281
  • [8] A new classification of mandibular asymmetry and evaluation of surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion
    Chen, Yi-Jane
    Yao, Chung-Chen
    Chang, Zwei-Chieng
    Lai, Hsiang-Hua
    Lu, Shao-Chun
    Kok, Sang-Heng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 44 (06) : 676 - 683
  • [9] Spectrum and management of dentofacial deformities in a multiethnic Asian population
    Chew, Ming Tak
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2006, 76 (05) : 806 - 809
  • [10] ENPP1 and ESR1 genotypes associated with subclassifications of craniofacial asymmetry and severity of temporomandibular disorders
    Chung, Kay
    Richards, Tabitha
    Nicot, Romain
    Vieira, Alexandre R.
    Cruz, Christiane V.
    Raoul, Gwenael
    Ferri, Joel
    Sciote, James J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 152 (05) : 631 - 645