A Machine Learning Classifier for Detection of Physical Activity Types and Postures During Free-Living

被引:27
作者
Bach, Kerstin [1 ]
Kongsvold, Atle [2 ]
Bardstu, Hilde [3 ,4 ]
Bardal, Ellen Marie [2 ,3 ]
Kjaernli, Hakon S. [1 ]
Herland, Sverre [1 ]
Logacjov, Aleksej [1 ]
Mork, Paul Jarle [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Comp Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Neuromed & Movement Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Sports Food & Nat Sci, Sogndal, Norway
关键词
epidemiology; human activity recognition; sedentary behavior; sitting; validity; wearable technology;
D O I
10.1123/jmpb.2021-0015
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Introduction: Accelerometer-based measurements of physical activity types are commonly used to replace self-reports. To advance the field, it is desirable that such measurements allow accurate detection of key daily physical activity types. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a machine learning classifier for detecting sitting, standing, lying, walking, running, and cycling based on a dual versus single accelerometer setups during free-living. Methods: Twenty-two adults (mean age [SD, range] 38.7 [14.4, 25-68] years) were wearing two Axivity AX3 accelerometers positioned on the low back and thigh along with a GoPro camera positioned on the chest to record lower body movements during free-living. The labeled videos were used as ground truth for training an eXtreme Gradient Boosting classifier using window lengths of 1, 3, and 5 s. Performance of the classifier was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Results: Total recording time was similar to 38 hr. Based on 5-s windowing, the overall accuracy was 96% for the dual accelerometer setup and 93% and 84% for the single thigh and back accelerometer setups, respectively. The decreased accuracy for the single accelerometer setup was due to a poor precision in detecting lying based on the thigh accelerometer recording (77%) and standing based on the back accelerometer recording (64%). Conclusion: Key daily physical activity types can be accurately detected during free-living based on dual accelerometer recording, using an eXtreme Gradient Boosting classifier. The overall accuracy decreases marginally when predictions are based on single thigh accelerometer recording, but detection of lying is poor.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 31
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Measurement of physical activity in clinical practice using accelerometers
    Arvidsson, D.
    Fridoltsson, J.
    Borjesson, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 286 (02) : 137 - 153
  • [2] Associations of Physical Behaviours and Behavioural Reallocations with Markers of Metabolic Health: A Compositional Data Analysis
    Biddle, Gregory J. H.
    Edwardson, Charlotte L.
    Henson, Joseph
    Davies, Melanie J.
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    Rowlands, Alex V.
    Yates, Thomas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10)
  • [3] XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
    Chen, Tianqi
    Guestrin, Carlos
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 785 - 794
  • [4] Comparison of physical behavior estimates from three different thigh-worn accelerometers brands: a proof-of-concept for the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting, and Sleep consortium (ProPASS)
    Crowley, Patrick
    Skotte, Jorgen
    Stamatakis, Emmanuel
    Hamer, Mark
    Aadahl, Mette
    Stevens, Matthew L.
    Rangul, Vegar
    Mork, Paul J.
    Holtermann, Andreas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2019, 16 (01)
  • [5] Associations of Sensor-Derived Physical Behavior with Metabolic Health: A Compositional Analysis in the Record Multisensor Study
    Debache, Isaac
    Bergouignan, Audrey
    Chaix, Basile
    Sneekes, Emiel M.
    Thomas, Frederique
    Sueur, Cedric
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (05)
  • [6] Demrozi F, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P210816, DOI [10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3037715, 10.1109/access.2020.3037715]
  • [7] Large Scale Population Assessment of Physical Activity Using Wrist Worn Accelerometers: The UK Biobank Study
    Doherty, Aiden
    Jackson, Dan
    Hammerla, Nils
    Plotz, Thomas
    Olivier, Patrick
    Granat, Malcolm H.
    White, Tom
    van Hees, Vincent T.
    Trenell, Michael I.
    Owen, Christoper G.
    Preece, Stephen J.
    Gillions, Rob
    Sheard, Simon
    Peakman, Tim
    Brage, Soren
    Wareham, Nicholas J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [8] Calibration and validation of accelerometer-based activity monitors: A systematic review of machine-learning approaches
    Farrahi, Vahid
    Niemela, Maisa
    Kangas, Maarit
    Korpelainen, Raija
    Jamsa, Timo
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 68 : 285 - 299
  • [9] Health Benefits of Light-Intensity Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of Accelerometer Data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
    Fuezeki, Eszter
    Engeroff, Tobias
    Banzer, Winfried
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 47 (09) : 1769 - 1793
  • [10] Giurgiu M., 2020, Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour, V3, P253, DOI [DOI 10.1123/JMPB.2019-0068, DOI 10.1123/JMPB]