Throwing fuel on the fire? Contrasting fine and coarse fuel responses to windthrow in temperate eucalypt forests in south-eastern Australia

被引:1
|
作者
Fairman, T. A. [1 ]
Symon, C. [1 ]
Cawson, J. [1 ]
Penman, T. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Agr Food & Ecosyst Sci, FLARE Wildfire Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Fire risk; Forest disturbance; Fuel hazard; Temperate eucalypt; Storm damage; Wildfire; Windthrow; WOODY DEBRIS; STAND STRUCTURE; DISTURBANCE; WIND; CONSUMPTION; MANAGEMENT; LITTER; DELEGATENSIS; CONSERVATION; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122266
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Windthrow is a disturbance in south-eastern Australian forests which significantly re-arranges forest and fuel structure by removing canopy trees. The implications for fuel dynamics and fire behaviour remains unquantified, making it a concern for fire managers. This study quantifies changes to forest and fuel structure caused by windthrow of varying severity, and uses this data to consider potential implications for fire behaviour. Thirty sites were established across dry eucalypt forests in south-eastern Australia similar to 2 years after a severe windstorm resulted in extensive areas of windthrow. Ten sites were selected within each of unimpacted, low and high severity windthrow areas. Fine fuels were assessed using visual estimates of height, cover and percent dead across various fuel strata (surface; near-surface; elevated; bark) to develop fuel hazard scores using established protocols. Coarse fuels (fallen branches, logs) were assessed using a line-intercept survey. Fuel data were used to calculate expected fire behaviour (rate of spread, flame height, total heat output and residence time) across windthrow severity. The trends in both fine and coarse fuels were largely reflective of the forest structural changes induced by windthrow. Surface fuel (i.e. dead litter on the forest floor) decreased in depth and cover, while near-surface fuels increased in cover, height and proportion of dead with increasing windthrow severity. This reflects a reduction in litter inputs from reduced canopy cover, and an increase in the abundance of grasses and fallen canopy debris. Elevated fuels (i.e., shrubs) were unchanged across windthrown and unimpacted sites; bark fuel decreased with increasing windthrow severity, reflecting a reduction in standing basal area at severely impacted sites. Coarse fuel loads substantially increased with windthrow severity: high severity sites had similar to 300 Mg/ha of coarse fuel loads compared to similar to 20 Mg/ha at unimpacted sites. The changes in fine and coarse fuels resulted in a 1.2-fold increase in predicted flame height and a 17-fold increase in total heat output and residence time in high severity windthrow sites compared with unimpacted sites. Our research shows that windthrow produces complex and contrasting patterns in fine and coarse fuel loads, and the increase in near-surface and coarse fuels confers greater potential fire intensity via increased flame height, total heat output and residence time. Windthrow represents a conundrum for fire managers who are required to balance the reduction in fire risk while also retaining the important habitat resource fallen logs represent.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Modelling the potential impact of climate variability and change on species regeneration potential in the temperate forests of South-Eastern Australia
    Mok, Hoi-Fei
    Arndt, Stefan K.
    Nitschke, Craig R.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2012, 18 (03) : 1053 - 1072
  • [32] Do Fire Cues Enhance Germination of Soil Seed Stores across an Ecotone of Wet Eucalypt Forest to Cool Temperate Rainforest in the Central Highlands of South-Eastern Australia?
    Younis, Samuel
    Kasel, Sabine
    FIRE-SWITZERLAND, 2023, 6 (04):
  • [33] Severe and Short Interval Fires Rearrange Dry Forest Fuel Arrays in South-Eastern Australia
    Gordon, Christopher E.
    Nolan, Rachael H.
    Boer, Matthias M.
    Bendall, Eli R.
    Williamson, Jane S.
    Price, Owen F.
    Kenny, Belinda J.
    Taylor, Jennifer E.
    Denham, Andrew J.
    Bradstock, Ross A.
    FIRE-SWITZERLAND, 2024, 7 (04):
  • [34] Landscape Structure and Mature Forest Biodiversity in Wet Eucalypt Forests: A Spatial Analysis of Timber Production Areas in South-Eastern Australia
    Wood, Sam W.
    Wardlaw, Timothy J.
    Pryde, Elizabeth C.
    Baker, Susan C.
    FORESTS, 2017, 8 (03):
  • [35] Evaluating the applicability of predicting dead fine fuel moisture based on the hourly Fine Fuel Moisture Code in the south-eastern Great Xing'an Mountains of China
    Zhang, Jili
    Cui, Xiaoyang
    Wei, Rui
    Huang, Yan
    Di, Xueying
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2017, 26 (02) : 167 - 175
  • [36] Influence of fire regime and other habitat factors on a eucalypt forest bird community in south-eastern Australia in the 1980s
    Smith, Peter
    Smith, Judy
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2016, 64 (05) : 312 - 326
  • [37] Prescribed fire increases pyrogenic carbon in litter and surface soil in lowland Eucalyptus forests of south-eastern Australia
    Krishnaraj, S. J.
    Baker, T. G.
    Polglase, P. J.
    Volkova, L.
    Weston, C. J.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 366 : 98 - 105
  • [38] Environmental heterogeneity promotes floristic turnover in temperate forests of south-eastern Australia more than dispersal limitation and disturbance
    Kasel, Sabine
    Bennett, Lauren T.
    Aponte, Cristina
    Fedrigo, Melissa
    Nitschke, Craig R.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2017, 32 (08) : 1613 - 1629
  • [39] Environmental heterogeneity promotes floristic turnover in temperate forests of south-eastern Australia more than dispersal limitation and disturbance
    Sabine Kasel
    Lauren T. Bennett
    Cristina Aponte
    Melissa Fedrigo
    Craig R. Nitschke
    Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32 : 1613 - 1629
  • [40] Is soil carbon a useful indicator of sustainable forest soil management? a case study from native eucalypt forests of south-eastern Australia
    Bauhus, J
    Khanna, PK
    Hopmans, P
    Weston, C
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 171 (1-2) : 59 - 74