Enhancing street-level bureaucrats 'compliance with policies challenging traditional customs through information frameworks: an experimental study in China

被引:1
作者
Wang, Yingwei [1 ]
Pan, Hong [2 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Sch Publ Adm, 1230 Anfeng St, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Chongqing, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Street-level bureaucrats; change customs; information framework; policy compliance; survey experiment; discretionary powerst; AFFECTIVE EVENTS THEORY; ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION; PUBLIC-SECTOR; CONTEXT; IMPLEMENTATION; INCENTIVES; MOTIVATION; NARRATIVES; DECISIONS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1080/17516234.2024.2402130
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Street-level bureaucrats face serious policy compliance challenges when implementing 'policies that run counter to traditional custom'. How can the compliance of street-level bureaucrats with such policies be enhanced? To answer this question, based on the policy context of a fireworks display ban, this paper examines the policy compliance behavioural tendencies of street-level bureaucrats under informational frames using a 2(emotional vs. logical) * 2 (gain vs. loss) experimental approach. It was found that different information frames differentially affect the policy compliance. Emotion-based information frames are more effective in strengthening street-level bureaucrats' policy compliance than logic-based narrative frames. Emphasizing losses is more effective in enhancing street-level bureaucrats' policy compliance than emphasizing gains. The attitude of street bureaucrats to policy plays a partly mediating role. This study provides insight into the street-level bureaucrats' policy compliance tendencies in implementing policies that are contrary to traditional custom, emphasizing the important role of information presentation mode in policy propaganda and mobilization in intervening in the policy compliance behaviour of street-level bureaucrats.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 80 条
[71]  
Tyler T.R., 2006, Why people obey the law, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400828609
[72]   Can street-level bureaucrats be nudged to increase effectiveness in welfare policy? [J].
Visintin, Emilio Paolo ;
Bonvin, Ean-Michel ;
Varone, Frederic ;
Butera, Fabrizio ;
Lovey, Max ;
Rosenstein, Emilie .
POLICY AND POLITICS, 2021, 49 (01) :121-139
[73]  
Wang Y., 2023, Promoting citizens willingness to participate in coproduction in public service through information frames, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12932, DOI 10.1111/PADM.12932]
[74]   Compliance Regimes and Barriers to Behavioral Change [J].
Weaver, R. Kent .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2014, 27 (02) :243-265
[75]   A test of basic assumptions of affective events theory (AET) in call centre work [J].
Wegge, Jurgen ;
van Dick, Rolf ;
Fisher, Gary K. ;
West, Michael A. ;
Dawson, Jeremy F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2006, 17 (03) :237-254
[76]  
Weiss HM, 1996, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V18, P1
[77]  
Wen B. C., 2023, Exploration, V2023, P137, DOI [https://doi.org/10.16501/j.cnki.50-1019/d.2023.03.009, DOI 10.16501/J.CNKI.50-1019/D.2023.03.009]
[78]   The Experience of Emotional Shifts in Narrative Persuasion [J].
Winkler, Julia R. ;
Appel, Markus ;
Schmidt, Marie-Luise C. R. ;
Richter, Tobias .
MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 26 (02) :141-171
[79]  
Winter SC, 2001, J POLICY ANAL MANAG, V20, P675, DOI 10.1002/pam.1023
[80]   FEELING AND THINKING - PREFERENCES NEED NO INFERENCES [J].
ZAJONC, RB .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1980, 35 (02) :151-175