Finding solutions to problems that never existed: a case study of co-creation in the municipality of the future

被引:0
作者
Ruess, Anja K. [1 ,2 ]
Mueller, Ruth [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Social Sci & Technol, Dept Sci Technol & Soc STS, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Management, Dept Econ & Policy, Munich, Germany
关键词
Co-creation; collaborative innovation; innovation governance; public engagement; smart cities; Science & Technology Studies; PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; URBAN LABORATORIES; PARTICIPATION; INNOVATION; CITY; GOVERNANCE; SCIENCE; ISSUES; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/23299460.2024.2391574
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Over the past decade, co-creation, i.e. practices bringing together diverse actors to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes, has emerged as a broadly desired approach to innovation governance. Co-creation takes many shapes and its promises range from more successful innovations to more inclusive and responsible forms of innovating. In this paper, we interrogate co-creation practices by tracing how they shape techno-society relations through the inclusion of publics in smart city contexts. Our analysis focuses on an initiative that aimed to include citizens into the development of smart city technologies. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork and qualitative interviews, we discuss the social dynamics of doing co-creation as establishing a distinct technology versus orienting innovation towards citizens' needs, and show how pre-made commitments to particular technologies and stakeholders shape citizens' agency. Understanding these dynamics will contribute to the growing debate about co-creation by providing a nuanced outlook on co-creative innovation practices, their potentials, and challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EUROPEAN COMMISSION
[2]  
Arnstein S., 1969, J AM I PLANNERS J AM I PLANNERS, V35, P216
[3]   Co-creation: A New Pathway for Solving Dysfunctionalities in Governance Systems? [J].
Bentzen, Tina Ollgaard .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2022, 54 (06) :1148-1177
[4]  
Berg Matthias., 2019, Smart-City-Atlas Die kommunale digitale Transformation in Deutschland
[5]  
Bucchi M, 2007, HANDBOOK OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES, THIRD EDITION, P449
[6]  
Bundesministerium des Innern fr Bau und Heimat, 2021, Smart City Charta: Digitale Transformation in den Kommunen nachhaltig gestalten
[7]   Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of 'citizen-focused' smart cities in Europe [J].
Cardullo, Paolo ;
Kitchin, Rob .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2019, 37 (05) :813-830
[8]  
Chaib J., 2019, The Projectification of the Public Sector, P75, DOI [10.4324/9781315098586, DOI 10.4324/9781315098586]
[9]  
Charmaz K., 2006, Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis, P1, DOI [10.7748/nr.13.4.84.s4, DOI 10.7748/NR.13.4.84.S4]
[10]   The good process or the great illusion? A spatial perspective on public participation in Danish municipal wind turbine planning [J].
Clausen, Laura Tolnov ;
Rudolph, David ;
Nyborg, Sophie .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2021, 23 (06) :732-751