Evolution and driver analysis of forest carbon stocks in karst mountainous areas of southwest China in the context of rocky desertification management

被引:4
作者
Luo, Dan [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Zhongfa [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Lu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Quan [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Denghong [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Qing [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Tangyin [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Lan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Normal Univ, Sch Karst Sci, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Guiyang 550001, Peoples R China
[2] State Engn Technol Inst Karst Desertificat Control, Guiyang, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[3] Real Estate Registrat Ctr Guizhou Prov, Guiyang 550001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Karst; Ecological engineering; Forest ecosystem carbon stocks; Spatiotemporal heterogeneity; MGWR; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; LAND-USE TYPES; TURNOVER TIMES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GREEN PROGRAM; SEQUESTRATION; DETERMINANTS; ACCUMULATION; REGRESSION; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.catena.2024.108335
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Forest carbon pools within karst regions are pivotal in the global carbon cycle, and elucidating the dynamics and principal drivers of forest carbon stocks is crucial for enhancing carbon sequestration in these areas. With the amelioration of karst ecosystems through rocky desertification control projects, the factors influencing forest carbon storage have become increasingly intricate. In this study, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model was corrected for forest age to estimate forest carbon stocks, and the Multi-scale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model was used to investigate the mechanisms of natural and socio-economic factors affecting forest carbon stocks during different ecological engineering periods. The results show that: Ecological engineering has made a significant contribution to the enhancement of forest carbon sinks in karst regions, with an increase in forest carbon stock of 34.82 t/hm(2) observed between 2001 and 2020. The ecological benefits exhibit a lagging effect, with the rate of carbon stock increase being markedly higher in the later stages of the project than in the initial and intermediate phases. There are substantial variations in the ecological benefits of ecological engineering across different karst landforms. The proportion of areas with significantly increased carbon stocks in the faulted basin (II) and karst valley (I) regions exceeding 70 %, while the karst trough valley (IV) has contributed the most to the increase in forest carbon sequestration. Moreover, the driving factors of carbon storage in forests in karst mountain areas exhibit spatiotemporal heterogeneity, with DEM and the human activity intensity of land surface (HAILS) significantly affecting the carbon sequestration function of regions IV and karst plateau (V) in the prior interim of ecological engineering; GDP has a significant positive effect on the karst peak cluster area (III) in the interim period; and in the late period, the inhibitory effect of HAILS on forest carbon sequestration weakens, while afforestation activities significantly enhance carbon sequestration in regions V and I. The research results have important reference value for improving the ecological benefits of ecological engineering in karst landforms, developing the potential of forest carbon sequestration, and addressing climate change.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, Guizhou Daily- 06-27
  • [2] Assessment and prediction of carbon sequestration using Markov chain and InVEST model in Sariska Tiger Reserve, India
    Babbar, Deepakshi
    Areendran, G.
    Sahana, Mehebub
    Sarma, Kiranmay
    Raj, Krishna
    Sivadas, Akhil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 278
  • [3] The main factors controlling spatial variability of soil organic carbon in a small karst watershed, Guizhou Province, China
    Bai, Yunxing
    Zhou, Yunchao
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2020, 357 (357)
  • [4] Reviews and syntheses: The mechanisms underlying carbon storage in soil
    Basile-Doelsch, Isabelle
    Balesdent, Jerome
    Pellerin, Sylvain
    [J]. BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2020, 17 (21) : 5223 - 5242
  • [5] Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests
    Bonan, Gordon B.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5882) : 1444 - 1449
  • [6] Vegetation cover changes in China induced by ecological restoration-protection projects and land-use changes from 2000 to 2020
    Cai, Yunfei
    Zhang, Fei
    Duan, Pan
    Jim, Chi Yung
    Chan, Ngai Weng
    Shi, Jingchao
    Liu, Changjiang
    Wang, Jianguo
    Bahtebay, Jupar
    Ma, Xu
    [J]. CATENA, 2022, 217
  • [7] Global covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems
    Carvalhais, Nuno
    Forkel, Matthias
    Khomik, Myroslava
    Bellarby, Jessica
    Jung, Martin
    Migliavacca, Mirco
    Mu, Mingquan
    Saatchi, Sassan
    Santoro, Maurizio
    Thurner, Martin
    Weber, Ulrich
    Ahrens, Bernhard
    Beer, Christian
    Cescatti, Alessandro
    Randerson, James T.
    Reichstein, Markus
    [J]. NATURE, 2014, 514 (7521) : 213 - +
  • [8] Rational land-use types in the karst regions of China: Insights from soil organic matter composition and stability
    Chang, Jingjing
    Zhu, Jianxing
    Xu, Li
    Su, Hongxin
    Gao, Yang
    Cai, Xianli
    Peng, Tao
    Wen, Xuefa
    Zhang, Jinjing
    He, Nianpeng
    [J]. CATENA, 2018, 160 : 345 - 353
  • [9] Human activity and climate change triggered the expansion of rocky desertification in the karst areas of Southwestern China
    Chen, Chaojun
    Yuan, Daoxian
    Cheng, Hai
    Yu, Tsailuen
    Shen, Chuanchou
    Edwards, R. Lawrence
    Wu, Yao
    Xiao, Siya
    Zhang, Jian
    Wang, Tao
    Huang, Ran
    Liu, Ziqi
    Li, Tingyong
    Li, Junyun
    [J]. SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2021, 64 (10) : 1761 - 1773
  • [10] China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management
    Chen, Chi
    Park, Taejin
    Wang, Xuhui
    Piao, Shilong
    Xu, Baodong
    Chaturvedi, Rajiv K.
    Fuchs, Richard
    Brovkin, Victor
    Ciais, Philippe
    Fensholt, Rasmus
    Tommervik, Hans
    Bala, Govindasamy
    Zhu, Zaichun
    Nemani, Ramakrishna R.
    Myneni, Ranga B.
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (02) : 122 - 129