Where are the inequalities in colorectal cancer care in a country with universal healthcare? A systematic review and narrative synthesis

被引:3
|
作者
Pickwell-Smith, Benjamin Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Spencer, Katie [3 ,4 ]
Sadeghi, Mahboobeh Haji [1 ]
Greenley, Sarah [1 ]
Lind, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Macleod, Una [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, England
[2] Hull & East Yorkshire Hosp NHS Trust, Kingston Upon Hull, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, England
[4] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
SOCIAL MEDICINE; Health policy; Adult oncology; Epidemiology; PUBLIC HEALTH; Systematic Review; RECTAL-CANCER; SOCIAL DEPRIVATION; SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITIES; AFFECTS SURVIVAL; LUNG; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; CHEMOTHERAPY; BREAST; TIME;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080467
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer living in more deprived areas experience worse survival than those in more affluent areas. Those living in more deprived areas face barriers to accessing timely, quality healthcare. These barriers may contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in survival. We evaluated the literature for any association between socioeconomic group, hospital delay and treatments received among patients with colorectal cancer in the UK, a country with universal healthcare. Design MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, SCIE, AMED and PsycINFO were searched from inception to January 2023. Grey literature, including HMIC, BASE and Google Advanced Search, and forward and backward citation searches were conducted. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts and full-text articles. Observational UK-based studies were included if they reported socioeconomic measures and an association with either hospital delay or treatments received. The QUIPS tool assessed bias risk, and a narrative synthesis was conducted. The review is reported to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020. Results 41 of the 7209 identified references were included. 12 studies evaluated 7 different hospital intervals. There was a significant association between area-level deprivation and a longer time from first presentation in primary care to diagnosis. 32 studies evaluated treatments received. There were socioeconomic inequalities in surgery and chemotherapy but not radiotherapy. Conclusion Patients with colorectal cancer face inequalities across the cancer care continuum. Further research is needed to understand why and what evidence-based actions can reduce these inequalities in treatment. Qualitative research of patients and clinicians conducted across various settings would provide a rich understanding of the complex factors that drive these inequalities. Further research should also consider using a causal approach to future studies to considerably strengthen the interpretation. Clinicians can try and mitigate some potential causes of colorectal cancer inequalities, including signposting to financial advice and patient transport schemes.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Where are the inequalities in ovarian cancer care in a country with universal healthcare? A systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Pickwell-Smith, Benjamin
    Greenley, Sarah
    Lind, Michael
    Macleod, Una
    JOURNAL OF CANCER POLICY, 2024, 39
  • [2] Patient choice in colorectal cancer treatment - A systematic review and narrative synthesis of attribute-based stated preference studies
    Kowal, Mikolaj
    Douglas, Francesca
    Jayne, David
    Meads, David
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 24 (11) : 1295 - 1307
  • [3] Healthcare resilience: a meta-narrative systematic review and synthesis of reviews
    Tan, Mark Z. Y.
    Prager, Gabrielle
    Mcclelland, Andrew
    Dark, Paul
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [4] Systematic review and narrative synthesis of computerized audit and feedback systems in healthcare
    Tsang, Jung Yin
    Peek, Niels
    Buchan, Iain
    van der Veer, Sabine N.
    Brown, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 29 (06) : 1106 - 1119
  • [5] Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis
    Hovlid, Einar
    Braut, Geir Sverre
    Hannisdal, Einar
    Walshe, Kieran
    Bukve, Oddbjorn
    Flottorp, Signe
    Stensland, Per
    Frich, Jan C.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (08):
  • [6] Thromboprophylaxis for inpatients with advanced cancer in palliative care settings: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Cai, Runting
    Zimmermann, Camilla
    Krzyzanowska, Monika
    Granton, John
    Hannon, Breffni
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 33 (05) : 486 - 499
  • [7] The Value of Clinical Colorectal Cancer Registries in Colorectal Cancer Research A Systematic Review
    MacCallum, Caroline
    Skandarajah, Anita
    Gibbs, Peter
    Hayes, Ian
    JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (09) : 841 - 849
  • [8] Factors associated with unscheduled care use by cancer decedents: a systematic review with narrative synthesis
    Mills, Sarah E. E.
    Geneen, Louise J.
    Buchanan, Deans
    Guthrie, Bruce
    Smith, Blair H.
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 14 (E1) : e50 - e57
  • [9] Barriers and facilitators to healthcare practitioners providing care for pregnant women with epilepsy: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Hughes, Anita
    Weckesser, Annalise
    Denny, Elaine
    Junaid, Fatima
    Nelson-Piercy, Cathy
    Black, Mairead
    Allotey, John
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    Dyson, Judith
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2024, 118 : 38 - 46
  • [10] Social franchising in healthcare: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of implementation and outcomes
    Rahman, Md Hafizur
    Perkins, Janet E.
    Usmani, Nasimul Ghani
    Manna, Ridwana Maher
    Sajib, Md Refat Uz Zaman
    Akter, Ema
    Shomik, Mohammad Sohel
    Ahmed, Anisuddin
    El Arifeen, Shams
    Hossain, Aniqa Tasnim
    Rahman, Ahmed Ehsanur
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2025, 10 (02):