Regret cross-efficiency evaluation using attitudinal entropy approach

被引:0
作者
Pan, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Guo-liang [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Xiao-lei [1 ,2 ]
Lou, Yuan-yu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Teng [1 ,2 ]
Guan, Zhong-cheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS | 2024年 / 11卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING; WEIGHT FLEXIBILITY; DEA MODELS; RANKING; PERFORMANCE; AGGREGATION; INTERVALS; AVERSION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-024-03817-5
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a popular nonparametric tool for measuring the performance of decision making unit (DMU). Cross-efficiency evaluation is an efficient means to rank DMUs, which compensates for efficiency overestimation and incomplete ranking of conventional DEA models. With respect to incomplete rational cross-efficiency evaluation, the common methods construct models with two extreme efficiencies as reference, such as efficiency values of the aggressive and benevolent models. In addition, they only explore the irrational preferences of decision maker (DM) at a certain stage in the evaluation process. They fail to investigate the cross-efficiency evaluation synthetically under incomplete rationality and characterize the complexity of the individuals' decision making. To fill this gap, a new method must be proposed. This paper proposes a new cross-efficiency termed regret cross-efficiency model using attitudinal entropy approach (RACE), which constructs a secondary goal model from a comprehensive perspective under the framework of regret theory, and introduces attitudinal entropy to aggregate the cross-efficiencies. Besides, this paper presents some empirical examples to illustrate the validity and robustness of the RACE method.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Attitude-based entropy function and applications in decision-making [J].
Aggarwal, Manish .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 104
[2]   Human decision making through an entropic framework [J].
Aggarwal, Manish .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 183
[3]   Decision aiding model with entropy-based subjective utility [J].
Aggarwal, Manish .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 501 :558-572
[4]   Ranking ranges in cross-efficiency evaluations [J].
Alcaraz, Javier ;
Ramon, Nuria ;
Ruiz, Jose L. ;
Sirvent, Inmaculada .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 226 (03) :516-521
[5]   Further examination of Moore's law with data envelopment analysis [J].
Anderson, T ;
Färe, R ;
Grosskopf, S ;
Inman, L ;
Song, XY .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2002, 69 (05) :465-477
[6]   Cross-ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis [J].
Angiz, Majid Zerafat ;
Mustafa, Adli ;
Kamali, Mohammad Jalal .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2013, 37 (1-2) :398-405
[7]   REGRET IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
BELL, DE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1982, 30 (05) :961-981
[8]   Application of DEA to medical clinics [J].
Birman, SV ;
Pirondi, PE ;
Rodin, EY .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2003, 37 (9-10) :923-936
[9]   Regret and the rationality of choices [J].
Bourgeois-Gironde, Sacha .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 365 (1538) :249-257
[10]   APPLIED DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BOUSSOFIANE, A ;
DYSON, RG ;
THANASSOULIS, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1991, 52 (01) :1-15