AI for chemistry teaching: responsible AI and ethical considerations

被引:3
作者
Blonder, Ron [1 ]
Feldman-Maggor, Yael [2 ]
机构
[1] Weizmann Inst Sci, Dept Sci Teaching, Rehovot, Israel
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, EECS Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci Media Technol & Int, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
ethics in science; artificial intelligence; web based learning; teacher education; teacher professional development;
D O I
10.1515/cti-2024-0014
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the ethical considerations surrounding generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in chemistry education, aiming to guide teachers toward responsible AI integration. GenAI, driven by advanced AI models like Large Language Models, has shown substantial potential in generating educational content. However, this technology's rapid rise has brought forth ethical concerns regarding general and educational use that require careful attention from educators. The UNESCO framework on GenAI in education provides a comprehensive guide to controversies around generative AI and ethical educational considerations, emphasizing human agency, inclusion, equity, and cultural diversity. Ethical issues include digital poverty, lack of national regulatory adaptation, use of content without consent, unexplainable models used to generate outputs, AI-generated content polluting the internet, lack of understanding of the real world, reducing diversity of opinions, and further marginalizing already marginalized voices and generating deep fakes. The paper delves into these eight controversies, presenting relevant examples from chemistry education to stress the need to evaluate AI-generated content critically. The paper emphasizes the importance of relating these considerations to chemistry teachers' content and pedagogical knowledge and argues that responsible AI usage in education must integrate these insights to prevent the propagation of biases and inaccuracies. The conclusion stresses the necessity for comprehensive teacher training to effectively and ethically employ GenAI in educational practices.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 395
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [21] Gilbert JK, 2008, MODEL MODEL SCI EDUC, V3, P3
  • [22] Artificial intelligence in education research during 2013-2023: A review based on bibliometric analysis
    Guo, Shuchen
    Zheng, Yuanyuan
    Zhai, Xiaoming
    [J]. EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 29 (13) : 16387 - 16409
  • [23] Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework
    Holmes, Wayne
    Porayska-Pomsta, Kaska
    Holstein, Ken
    Sutherland, Emma
    Baker, Toby
    Shum, Simon Buckingham
    Santos, Olga C.
    Rodrigo, Mercedes T.
    Cukurova, Mutlu
    Bittencourt, Ig Ibert
    Koedinger, Kenneth R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, 2022, 32 (03) : 504 - 526
  • [24] Moving Beyond Politics: Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Respect
    Kassam, Kamillah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 99 (08) : 2773 - 2774
  • [25] Bridging large language model disparities: Skill tagging of multilingual educational content
    Kwak, Yerin
    Pardos, Zachary A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 55 (05) : 2039 - 2057
  • [26] Li T., 2024, P 18 INT C LEARNING, P1323
  • [27] Design Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-to-Image Generative Models
    Liu, Vivian
    Chilton, Lydia B.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI' 22), 2022,
  • [28] AN INTRODUCTION TO CYCLIC VOLTAMMETRY
    MABBOTT, GA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1983, 60 (09) : 697 - 702
  • [29] Mamlok-Naaman R., 2024, CTR ED POLICY STUDIE, V14, P13, DOI [https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1718, DOI 10.26529/CEPSJ.1718]
  • [30] Markic S., 2024, CTR ED POLICY STUDIE, V14, P7, DOI [10.26529/cepsj.1886, DOI 10.26529/CEPSJ.1886]