The digital trade advantage: investigating the impact on global value chain positions in manufacturing and service industries

被引:0
作者
Wu, Haiting [1 ]
Wang, Xingshuai [1 ]
Khalid, Zainab [2 ]
Elahi, Ehsan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Zibo 255049, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
Trade; digital trade; global value chain; heterogeneity; China; F40; Q27;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2024.2387370
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates the impact of digital trade on global value chain (GVC) positions across industries and countries from 2007-2018. A newly developed digital trade level index measures various dimensions including digital infrastructure, industrial digital trade, e-commerce industrialization, and trade potential. Results show that digital trade significantly enhances GVC positioning, with trade potential having the strongest effect. The study also finds that digital trade drives GVC upgrading by optimizing industrial structures. Developed countries experience greater impacts of digital trade on GVC positions compared to developing nations, highlighting country heterogeneity. Industry differences are also observed, with medium-low tech manufacturing and transportation and warehousing services being most influenced by digital trade. The study uncovers industrial structure upgrading as a key mechanism through which digital trade improves GVC positions, though the industrial digital trade dimension somewhat impedes this effect. Based on these findings, the study provides policy insights for developing countries to harness digital trade for GVC upgrading, such as increasing investments in susceptible industries, fostering domestic and global digital ecosystems, promoting efficient resource allocation, and supporting digital integration in medium-low tech manufacturing.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Services Reform and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from India
    Arnold, Jens Matthias
    Javorcik, Beata
    Lipscomb, Molly
    Mattoo, Aaditya
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2016, 126 (590) : 1 - 39
  • [2] Bao Z., 2020, Southeast Academic Research, V3, P172, DOI [https://doi.org/10.13658/j.cnki.sar.2020.03.019, DOI 10.13658/J.CNKI.SAR.2020.03.019]
  • [3] Calvino F., 2018, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, DOI [DOI 10.1787/F404736A-EN, DOI 10.1787/18151965]
  • [4] Chen X., 2019, J WORLD EC, V42, P72
  • [5] Guan H., 2023, International Economics and Trade Research, V39, P89, DOI [https://doi.org/10.13687/j.cnki.gjjmts.2023.05.004, DOI 10.13687/J.CNKI.GJJMTS.2023.05.004]
  • [6] Hu Z.L., 2017, International Economics and Trade Research, V33, P4, DOI [10.13687/j.cnki.gjjmts.2017.12.001, DOI 10.13687/J.CNKI.GJJMTS.2017.12.001]
  • [7] Digital economy to encourage sustainable consumption and reduce carbon emissions
    Jiang, Huanyue
    Elahi, Ehsan
    Gao, Mingtao
    Huang, Yumei
    Liu, Xinru
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 443
  • [8] Koopman R., 2010, Working Paper 16426, DOI [10.3386/w16426, DOI 10.3386/W16426]
  • [9] Li D., 2020, THEORETICAL DISCUSSI, V1, P115
  • [10] Li N., 2021, Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, V3, P87