共 50 条
The Contribution of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT to Staging and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer
被引:3
|作者:
Beyhan, Ediz
[1
,2
]
Cermik, Tevfik Fikret
[2
,3
]
Fenercioglu, Ozge Erol
[2
]
Sahin, Rahime
[2
]
Alcin, Goksel
[2
]
Aksoy, Tamer
[2
,4
]
Arslan, Esra
[2
]
Ergul, Nurhan
[2
]
机构:
[1] Sirnak State Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, Nucan St 34, TR-73000 Sirnak, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Training & Res Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, KasapIlyas Dist Org Abdurrahman Nafiz Gurman St, TR-34098 Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, Maslak, Turkiye
[4] Hisar Intercontinental Hosp, Clin Nucl Med, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词:
F-18;
Ga-68;
FDG;
fibroblast activation protein;
gastric cancers;
PET/CT;
D O I:
10.1097/RLU.0000000000005394
中图分类号:
R8 [特种医学];
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100207 ;
1009 ;
摘要:
Aim: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic capabilities of F-18-FDG PET/CT and Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging in staging gastric carcinoma, exploring the impact of Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT on treatment planning and its prognostic significance. Methods: The research included 31 patients undergoing staging for gastric cancer, who received both F-18-FDG PET/CT and Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT scans. We compared the SUVmax and SUVmean of the primary tumor and lymph nodes, the count of organ metastases, tumor-to-background ratios, and overall staging accuracy. Additionally, the study evaluated radiological progression-free survival and overall survival rates. Results: The Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated superior efficacy in identifying the primary tumor compared with F-18-FDG PET/CT, particularly in cases of poorly cohesive, signet-ring cell, and mucinous subtypes, with detection rates of 96.7% versus 77.4% (P = 0.006 and P = 0.008, respectively). Analysis of lymph nodes showed a significantly higher detection of positive nodes with Ga-68-FAPI-04 (P = 0.026), although no significant differences were observed in SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio on a patient basis (P > 0.05). SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratios for peritoneal involvement were notably higher with Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT compared with F-18-FDG PET/CT (P = 0.04 for both). No significant differences were found in the detection of organ metastases and disease stage between the 2 imaging modalities (P > 0.05). Primary tumor uptake did not significantly impact radiological progression-free survival or overall survival in either modality. Conclusions: Ga-68-FAPI-04 PET/CT imaging surpasses F-18-FDG PET/CT in detecting the primary tumor, especially in poorly cohesive and signet-ring cell gastric cancer types, and offers improved accuracy in disease staging. This indicates its potential to enhance treatment management and prognostic assessment in gastric cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:e485 / e491
页数:7
相关论文