Modified supine (Giusti) percutaneous nephrolithotomy is noninferior to standard prone procedure for renal calculi: A single-center prospective randomized study

被引:0
|
作者
Ratkal, Jaideep [1 ]
Patel, Azharuddin Sharif [1 ]
Manjuprasad, G. B. [1 ]
Sampathkumar, R. N. [1 ]
Raykar, Raviraj [1 ]
机构
[1] Karnataka Inst Med Sci, Dept Urol & Renal Transplant, House 3,Block D, Hubli 580022, Karnataka, India
关键词
absolute stone-free rate; Clavien-Dindo grading; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; stone-free status; Visual Analog Scale; CLINICAL-RESEARCH OFFICE; POSITION; COMPLICATIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/us9.0000000000000004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose:The objective is to compare operative times, safety, effectiveness, postoperative pain, and need for analgesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the modified supine (Giusti) versus the standard prone position. Materials and methods:A prospective randomized study of 82 patients was conducted from August 2021 to August 2022 at a tertiary medical teaching hospital. The cohort was divided into modified supine and prone PCNL groups (40 and 42 patients in supine and prone). The measured variables included age, sex, body mass index, stone size, comorbidities, procedure time, stone-free rate, pain severity/Visual Analog Scale, analgesia requirement, hospital stay, and complications (modified Clavien-Dindo grading). Results:The 2 groups were comparable in mean age, male-to-female ratio, stone size, residual calculi, and postoperative fever. The mean procedure time was 72.24 versus 90.12 minutes in favor of the modified supine PCNL (P < 0.001). The absolute stone-free rate showed no significant difference (82.5% versus 80.95%; P = 0.91) in both the groups. The severity of postoperative pain according to Visual Analog Scale was 2.9 (2-5) and 5.1 (3-7) in the modified supine and prone groups (P < 0.001). Patients undergoing supine PCNL needed analgesics fewer times and in lesser dosage than the prone PCNL group (1.27 versus 3.93; P < 0.001). Hospital stay was shorter in the supine group than the prone group (2.87 versus 4.40 days; P < 0.001). No differences in septic or bleeding complications were found. Conclusion:The modified supine PCNL is safe and noninferior to prone PCNL with shorter operative time, reduced postoperative pain, lesser need for analgesia, and shorter hospital stay, with the additional benefit of minimal physiological changes during anesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 84
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prone versus Modified Supine Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Prospective Randomized Study
    Wang, Yanbo
    Wang, Yan
    Yao, Yunming
    Xu, Ning
    Zhang, Haifeng
    Chen, Qihui
    Lu, Zhihua
    Hu, Jinghai
    Wang, Xiaoqing
    Lu, Ji
    Hao, Yuanyuan
    Jiang, Fengming
    Hou, Yuchuan
    Wang, Chunxi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 10 (11): : 1518 - 1523
  • [2] A prospective, randomized comparison of standard prone position versus flank-free modified supine position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A single-center initial experience
    Zanaty, Fouad
    Mousa, Alaa
    Elgharabawy, Mohamed
    Elshazly, Mohamed
    Sultan, Sultan
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2022, 14 (02) : 172 - 176
  • [3] Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access:: A prospective randomized trial
    De Sio, Marco
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Quarto, Giuseppe
    Calabro, Francesco
    Damiano, Rocco
    Giuyliano, Francesco
    Mordente, Saluatore
    D'Armiento, Massimo
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (01) : 196 - 203
  • [4] Supine versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi: Our experience
    Mulay, Abhirudra
    Mane, Deepak
    Mhaske, Sunil
    Shah, Avreen S.
    Krishnappa, Deepak
    Sabale, Vilas
    CURRENT UROLOGY, 2022, 16 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [5] Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Is a Noninferior Modality to Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of 20-40 mm Renal Calculi: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zeng, Guohua
    Cai, Chao
    Duan, Xianzhong
    Xun, Xu
    Mao, Houping
    Li, Xuedong
    Nie, Yong
    Xie, Jianjun
    Li, Jiongming
    Lu, Jun
    Zou, Xiaofeng
    Mok, Jianfeng
    Li, Chengyang
    Li, Jianzhong
    Wang, Weiguo
    Yu, Yonggang
    Fei, Xiang
    Gu, Xianen
    Chen, Jianhui
    Kong, Xiangbo
    Pan, Jian
    Zhu, Wei
    Zhao, Zhijian
    Wu, Wenqi
    Sun, Hongling
    Liu, Yongda
    de la Rosette, Jean
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (01) : 114 - 121
  • [6] Safety and efficacy of ultramini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in comparison with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of renal calyceal calculi 1-2cm in size: a comparative randomized prospective study
    Radwan, Ahmed I.
    Satour, Ashraf M.
    Abdallah, Hany M.
    Eldin, Mohamed A. Gamal
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 41 (04) : 1789 - 1800
  • [7] Complete Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Prone and Supine Positions: A Randomized Controlled Study
    El-Shaer, Waleed
    Kandeel, Wael
    Abdel-Lateef, Sally
    Torky, Ahmed
    Elshaer, Alaa
    UROLOGY, 2019, 128 : 31 - 37
  • [8] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Stones in Patients with Solitary Kidney in Prone Position or in completely Supine Position: a Single-center Experience
    Wang, Yanbo
    Hou, Yuchuan
    Jiang, Fengming
    Wang, Yan
    Wang, Chunxi
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2012, 38 (06): : 788 - 794
  • [9] Single-step dilatation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, its safety and efficacy: A prospective, single-center study
    Girisha, T. D.
    Dev, Preetham
    Vijaykumar, R.
    Dharwadkar, Sachin
    Madappa, K. M.
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2019, 11 (02) : 171 - 174
  • [10] The modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique and comparison with standard nephrolithotomy: a randomized prospective study
    Karakan, Tolga
    Kilinc, Muhammet Fatih
    Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan
    Yildiz, Yildiray
    Yuceturk, Cem Nedim
    Bagcioglu, Murat
    Karagoz, Mehmet Ali
    Bas, Okan
    Resorlu, Berkan
    UROLITHIASIS, 2017, 45 (02) : 209 - 213