Building an evaluation index system of musical collaborative capacity for China's compulsory music education: Using a combined Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process approach

被引:0
作者
Su, Hang [1 ]
Qu, Houhua [1 ]
Luo, Yue [2 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Analytic Hierarchy Process; collaborative capacity; Delphi method; evaluation index system; music education; Social Interdependence Theory; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1177/02557614241281924
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The latest version of China's National Compulsory Education Curriculum Programme and Standards 2022 (hereafter CECPS 2022) emphasises the cultivation of students' collaborative capacities, mentioning 'carrying out the core literacy effectively'. From the perspective of music education, this study summarises the requirements for collaborative activities in compulsory courses of the music discipline within CECPS 2022 in the light of Social Interdependence Theory, and builds an Evaluation Index System of Collaborative Capacity (hereafter EISMCC) by employing the Delphi method and an Analytic Hierarchy Process approach. After 3 rounds of expert consultations and revisions, it was found that EISMCC in compulsory music education is comprised of 3 first-level indices, 7 second-level indices and 20 third-level indices. The index framework and the results of the weight distribution with reliable quality reflect the experts' emphasis on the process, goal orientation and synergistic interaction of collaborative activities in music learning. The whole system considers people's general understanding of collaborative capacity, the calls within CECPS 2022 for collaborative music activities, and the practical demands of music teaching in compulsory education. This study provides a theoretical basis, a design process paradigm, practical guidance and a valid tool for the evaluation of collaborative capacity in compulsory education.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Cognition and behavior
    Aizawa, Ken
    [J]. SYNTHESE, 2017, 194 (11) : 4269 - 4288
  • [2] Collaboration
    Barfield, Andy
    [J]. ELT JOURNAL, 2016, 70 (02) : 222 - 224
  • [3] Beodeker R.J., 2006, Faculty and student affairs collaboration: Factors that support and inhibit collaborative capacity
  • [4] Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism
    Botvinick, Matthew
    Braver, Todd
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 66, 2015, 66 : 83 - 113
  • [5] Boyraz S., 2021, African Educational Research Journal, V9, P907
  • [6] Chen Z, 2022, Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, V54, P100
  • [7] Ezzat Abdelrahman E M, 2016, Avicenna J Med, V6, P3, DOI 10.4103/2231-0770.173579
  • [8] Fitzgerald SP, 2004, ADV INT ST, V10, P161
  • [9] Student Collaboration in Group Work: Inclusion as Participation
    Frykedal, Karin Forslund
    Chiriac, Eva Hammar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISABILITY DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION, 2018, 65 (02) : 183 - 198
  • [10] Gardner D.R., 2005, The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, V10, P1, DOI [DOI 10.3912/OJIN.VOL10NO01MAN01, 10.3912/oJIN.Vol10No01Man01]