The impact of long-term care insurance on the utilization of inpatient service: Evidence and mechanisms in China

被引:0
作者
Han, Xiao [1 ]
Wang, Hanyang [2 ]
Du, Xia [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Social Sci CASS, Inst Populat & Lab Econ IPLE, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Bloomington, IN USA
[3] Nankai Univ, Sch Finance, 94 Weijin Rd, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
income effect; inpatient service; long-term care insurance; PSM-DID; substitution effect; HEALTH; PROPENSITY; RETIREMENT; SYSTEM; POLICY;
D O I
10.1002/hec.4896
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper empirically investigates the impact of public long-term care insurance (LTCI) on the utilization of inpatient services and associated expenditures among disabled Chinese individuals, using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study from 2011 to 2018. Employing a staggered difference-in-difference approach within a propensity score matching framework (PSM-DID), the study finds that the introduction of LTCI significantly reduces the likelihood of inpatient service usage by 4.2%, the annual number of inpatient admissions by 10.2%, the annual inpatient cost by 16.2%, the out-of-pocket expenses by 20.7%, and the reimbursement expenditure by the public medical insurer by 9.9%. The study further explores the mechanisms underlying these effects and identifies that the Substitution Effect, where care services in community healthcare centers and nursing homes replace hospitalizations, outweighs the Income Effect generated by LTCI benefits. By leveraging the quasi-natural experimental setting of diverse LTCI policies across cities, the study also examines the heterogeneous impacts of LTCI based on household income, eligibility criteria, and reimbursement methods. The findings underscore the positive role of LTCI in controlling medical expenses and alleviating congestion in urban hospitals, offering valuable insights for promoting "Healthy Aging".
引用
收藏
页码:2778 / 2797
页数:20
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Synthetic Difference-in-Differences
    Arkhangelsky, Dmitry
    Athey, Susan
    Hirshberg, David A.
    Imbens, Guido W.
    Wager, Stefan
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 111 (12) : 4088 - 4118
  • [2] The interaction of public and private insurance: Medicaid and the long-term care insurance market
    Brown, Jeffrey R.
    Finkelstein, Amy
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (03) : 1083 - 1102
  • [3] Lessons From Public Long-Term Care Insurance In Germany And Japan
    Campbell, John Creighton
    Ikegami, Naoki
    Gibson, Mary Jo
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2010, 29 (01) : 87 - 95
  • [4] The distribution of wealth and the marginal propensity to consume
    Carroll, Christopher
    Slacalek, Jiri
    Tokuoka, Kiichi
    White, Matthew N.
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS, 2017, 8 (03) : 977 - 1020
  • [5] Care providers, access to care, and the Long-term Care Nursing Insurance in China: An agent-based simulation
    Chang, Shuang
    Yang, Wei
    Deguchi, Hiroshi
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2020, 244
  • [6] The impacts of long-term care insurance on health care utilization and expenditure: evidence from China
    Chen, He
    Ning, Jing
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2022, 37 (06) : 717 - 727
  • [7] Effects of public long-term care insurance on the medical service use by older people in South Korea
    Cho, Yoon-Min
    Kwon, Soonman
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW, 2023, 18 (02) : 154 - 171
  • [8] Does long-term care insurance reduce the burden of medical costs? A retrospective elderly cohort study
    Choi, Jae Woo
    Park, Eun-Cheol
    Lee, Sang Gyu
    Park, Sohee
    Ryu, Hwang-Gun
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    [J]. GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 18 (12) : 1641 - 1646
  • [9] Aging in Place, Housing Maintenance, and Reverse Mortgages
    Cocco, Joao F.
    Lopes, Paula
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2020, 87 (04) : 1799 - 1836
  • [10] Family spillovers and long-term care insurance
    Coe, Norma B.
    Goda, Gopi Shah
    Van Houtven, Courtney Harold
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2023, 90