Comparing subjective quality of recovery between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for surgical procedures: a meta-analysis

被引:5
作者
Hung, Kuo-Chuan [1 ]
Wang, Wei-Ting [2 ]
Liu, Wei-Cheng [1 ,3 ]
Hsu, Chih-Wei [4 ,5 ]
Huang, Yen-Ta [6 ]
Wu, Jheng-Yan [7 ]
Chen, I-Wen [8 ]
机构
[1] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] I Shou Univ, Eda Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Shu Zen Jr Coll Med & Management, Dept Occupat Therapy, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[6] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Tainan, Taiwan
[7] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Nutr, Tainan, Taiwan
[8] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, 201 Taikang Taikang Vil, Tainan 73657, Taiwan
关键词
Remimazolam; Propofol; Quality of recovery; QoR; General anesthesia; OPIOID-INDUCED HYPERALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE QUALITY; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; UROLOGIC SURGERY; EFFICACY; SATISFACTION; INDUCTION; SAFETY; ADULTS; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-024-02660-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundRemimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that has been recently introduced as an alternative to propofol for general anesthesia. While both agents have been compared in terms of safety and efficacy, their relative effects on postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) remain unclear. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on subjective QoR in surgical patients who underwent general anesthesia.MethodsMedline, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to May 28, 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing remimazolam and propofol in terms of postoperative QoR. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) was used to assess study quality. QoR score on postoperative day (POD) 1 (primary outcome), QoR scores on PODs 2-3, QoR dimensions, time to loss of consciousness, other recovery characteristics, and rescue analgesia requirement were evaluated using random-effects meta-analyses.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 13 studies published between 2022 and 2024 involving 1,418 patients. QoR was evaluated using either the QoR-15 (10 studies) or QoR-40 (3 studies) questionnaire. The pooled results indicated no significant difference in the QoR scores on POD 1 (standardized mean difference: 0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 0.20, 0.23, P = 0.88, I2 = 73%) and PODs 2-3 between remimazolam and propofol. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in QoR dimensions, length of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, and time to extubation as well as in the risks of agitation and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Patients administered remimazolam exhibited slower anesthetic induction (mean difference (MD): 32.27 s) but faster recovery of consciousness (MD: - 1.60 min) than those administered propofol. Moreover, remimazolam was associated with a lower risk of rescue analgesia requirement in the PACU (risk ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.89, P = 0.009, I2 = 0%) but not in the ward.ConclusionRemimazolam is a potential alternative to propofol for general anesthesia as it offers similar QoR to the latter and has advantages in terms of consciousness recovery and immediate postoperative analgesia requirement.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 58 条
[31]   Comparative Study About Different Doses of Remimazolam in Short Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial [J].
Luo, Li ;
Jiang, Jiduan ;
Zhang, Min ;
Guo, Zhiqiang ;
Zhang, Xianzheng ;
Wang, Fenglin ;
Yang, Fan .
THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2023, 19 :829-837
[32]   Quality of Recovery After General Anesthesia with Remimazolam in Patients' Undergoing Urologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Remimazolam with Propofol [J].
Mao, Yuanyuan ;
Guo, Jin ;
Yuan, Jingjing ;
Zhao, Erxian ;
Yang, Jianjun .
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2022, 16 :1199-1209
[33]   Intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine and quality of recovery after elective surgery in adult patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Miao, Mengrong ;
Xu, Yuehua ;
Li, Bing ;
Chang, Enqiang ;
Zhang, Liyuan ;
Zhang, Jiaqiang .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2020, 65
[34]   More than just morbidity and mortality - quality of recovery and long-term functional recovery after surgery [J].
Myles, P. S. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 75 :E143-E150
[35]   Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Myles, Paul S. ;
Shulman, Mark A. ;
Reilly, Jennifer ;
Kasza, Jessica ;
Romero, Lorena .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 128 (06) :1029-1039
[36]   An Updated Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the QoR-15 Scale [J].
Myles, Paul S. ;
Myles, Daniel B. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 135 (05) :934-935
[37]   Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40 [J].
Myles, PS ;
Weitkamp, B ;
Jones, K ;
Melick, J ;
Hensen, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (01) :11-15
[38]   Effect of total intravenous anesthesia or inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Niu, Zheng ;
Gao, Xiuxiu ;
Shi, Zeshu ;
Liu, Tianyu ;
Wang, Min ;
Guo, Lulu ;
Qi, Dunyi .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2021, 73
[39]   Does Propofol Anesthesia Lead to Less Postoperative Pain Compared With Inhalational Anesthesia?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Peng, Ke ;
Liu, Hua-Yue ;
Wu, Shao-Ru ;
Liu, Hong ;
Zhang, Zhao-Cai ;
Ji, Fu-Hai .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 (04) :846-858
[40]  
Peng XL, 2023, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V26, pE761