Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation for health systems

被引:1
|
作者
Morgan, Rosemary [1 ]
Kalbarczyk, Anna [1 ]
Decker, Michele [2 ]
Elnakib, Shatha [1 ]
Igusa, Tak [3 ]
Luo, Amy [2 ]
Oladimeji, Ayoyemi Toheeb [3 ]
Nakatabira, Milly [1 ]
Peters, David H. [4 ]
Prihartono, Indira [1 ]
Malhotra, Anju [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Family & Reprod Hlth, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Whiting Sch Engn, Dept Civil & Syst Engn, 3400 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[4] York Univ, Fac Hlth, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Gender; gender equity; health systems; monitoring and evaluation; equity; health inequalities;
D O I
10.1093/heapol/czae073
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Gender-responsive monitoring and evaluation (M&E) for health and health systems interventions and programs is vital to improve health, health systems, and gender equality outcomes. It can be used to identify and address gender disparities in program participation, outcomes and benefits, as well as ensure that programs are designed and implemented in a way that is inclusive and accessible for all. While gender-responsive M&E is most effective when interventions and programs intentionally integrate a gender lens, it is relevant for all health systems programs and interventions. Within the literature, gender-responsive M&E is defined in different and diverse ways, making it difficult to operationalize. This is compounded by the complexity and multi-faceted nature of gender. Within this methodological musing, we present our evolving approach to gender-responsive M&E which we are operationalizing within the Monitoring for Gender and Equity project. We define gender-responsive M&E as intentionally integrating the needs, rights, preferences of, and power relations among, women and girls, men and boys, and gender minority individuals, as well as across social, political, economic, and health systems in M&E processes. This is done through the integration of different types of gender data and indicators, including: sex- or gender-specific, sex- or gender-disaggregated, sex- or gender-specific/disaggregated which incorporate needs, rights and preferences, and gender power relations and systems indicators. Examples of each of these are included within the paper. Active approaches can also enhance the gender-responsiveness of any M&E activities, including incorporating an intersectional lens and tailoring the types of data and indicators included and processes used to the specific context. Incorporating gender into the programmatic cycle, including M&E, can lead to more fit-for-purpose, effective and equitable programs and interventions. The framework presented in this paper provides an outline of how to do this, enabling the uptake of gender-responsive M&E.
引用
收藏
页码:1000 / 1005
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Towards an agenda of action and research for making health systems responsive to the needs of people with disabilities
    Nguyen, Thi Vinh
    Kane, Sumit
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2024, 52
  • [42] Mental Health Evaluation for Gender Confirmation Surgery
    Ettner, Randi
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 45 (03) : 307 - +
  • [43] Gender dynamics in digital health: overcoming blind spots and biases to seize opportunities and responsibilities for transformative health systems
    George, A. S.
    Morgan, R.
    Larson, E.
    LeFevre, A.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 40 : 6 - 11
  • [44] Health systems resilience in fragile and shock-prone settings through the prism of gender equity and justice: implications for research, policy and practice
    Mansour, Wesam
    Arjyal, Abriti
    Hughes, Chad
    Gbaoh, Emma Tiange
    Fouad, Fouad Mohamed
    Wurie, Haja
    Kyaw, Hnin Kalayar
    Tartaggia, Julie
    Hawkins, Kate
    Than, Kyu Kyu
    Kallon, Lansana Hassim
    Abou Saad, Maya
    Chand, Obindra
    Win, Phone Myint
    Yamout, Rouham
    Regmi, Shophika
    Baral, Sushil
    Theobald, Sally
    Raven, Joanna
    CONFLICT AND HEALTH, 2022, 16 (01)
  • [45] Health systems resilience in fragile and shock-prone settings through the prism of gender equity and justice: implications for research, policy and practice
    Wesam Mansour
    Abriti Arjyal
    Chad Hughes
    Emma Tiange Gbaoh
    Fouad Mohamed Fouad
    Haja Wurie
    Hnin Kalayar Kyaw
    Julie Tartaggia
    Kate Hawkins
    Kyu Kyu Than
    Lansana Hassim Kallon
    Maya Abou Saad
    Obindra Chand
    Phone Myint Win
    Rouham Yamout
    Shophika Regmi
    Sushil Baral
    Sally Theobald
    Joanna Raven
    Conflict and Health, 16
  • [46] Administrative integration of vertical HIV monitoring and evaluation into health systems: a case study from South Africa
    Kawonga, Mary
    Fonn, Sharon
    Blaauw, Duane
    GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2013, 6 : 157 - 168
  • [47] Key Considerations for Accountability and Gender in Health Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
    Waldman, Linda
    Theobald, Sally
    Morgan, Rosemary
    IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2018, 49 (02): : 81 - 93
  • [48] Digital health, gender and health equity: invisible imperatives
    Sinha, Chaitali
    Schryer-Roy, Anne-Marie
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 40 : 1 - 5
  • [49] Gender and disadvantage in health: men's health for a change
    Cameron, E
    Bernardes, J
    SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 1998, 20 (05) : 673 - 693
  • [50] Developing a framework for the monitoring and evaluation of the Health Transformation Plan in the Islamic Republic of Iran: lessons learned
    Abdi, Zhaleh
    Majdzadeh, Reza
    Ahmadnezhad, Elham
    EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN HEALTH JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (06) : 394 - 405