Evaluating the Sustainability of Sugar Beet Production Using Life Cycle Assessment Approach

被引:0
作者
Azizpanah, Amir [1 ]
Taki, Morteza [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ilam, Coll Agr, Dept Mech Biosyst, Ilam, Iran
[2] Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ Khuzestan, Fac Agr Engn & Rural Dev, Dept Agr Machinery & Mechanizat Engn, Mollasani, Iran
关键词
Energy efficiency; Sustainability; Production cost; Cobb-Douglas model; ENERGY-USE EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; WHEAT; FRUIT;
D O I
10.1007/s12355-024-01488-9
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This study aimed to investigate the energy consumption and Global Warming Potential (GWP) of sugar beet production in Cherdavel (33.7018 degrees N, 47.0194 degrees E in Ilam province) and Islamabad (34.1132 degrees N, 46.5279 degrees E in Kermanshah province), Iran. Data were collected through detailed questionnaires and in-depth interviews with farmers. Environmental impacts were assessed using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, which evaluates the environmental effects throughout its entire life cycle, from raw material extraction to disposal. The CML-IA baseline V3.08/EU25 method was used for this assessment, providing a standardized framework for impact categories such as global warming, abiotic depletion, and toxicity. The results indicated that energy consumption for sugar beet production in Cherdavel and Islamabad regions was 55,308.42 and 54,871.22 MJha-1, respectively. The energy efficiency index was calculated as 17.01 and 14.69 for Cherdavel and Islamabad, respectively. The economic analysis showed that in Cherdavel and Islamabad, the profit-to-cost ratio was 2.05 and 1.89, and the economic productivity of production was 11.41 and 10.53 kg$-1, respectively. The results of modeling with the Cobb-Douglas function, a common econometric model used to represent the relationship between inputs and outputs, showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) in Cherdavel and Islamabad regions was 0.93 and 0.96, respectively. This high R2 value indicates a strong correlation between the input variables and the output (sugar beet yield), suggesting that the model accurately represents the production process. The results showed that Global Warming Potential (GWP) in Cherdavel and Islamabad was 54.05 and 44.47 (kg CO2eq) per ton of sugar beet production, respectively. These values are relatively high compared to other crops, indicating significant greenhouse gas emissions associated with sugar beet production in these regions. Abiotic Depletion for Fossil fuels (ADF) was 435.69 and 363.19 MJ, Human Toxicity (HT) was 21.53 and 16.87 (1,4-DB eq kg), and Marine Aquatic Ecotoxicity (MAE) was 23,543.82 and 18,306.06 (1,4-DB eq kg) in Cherdavel and Islamabad, respectively. These metrics highlight the substantial environmental impacts of sugar beet production with Cherdavel showing higher values in most categories. Despite these environmental concerns, both regions demonstrated favorable economic productivity and profit-to-cost ratios, suggesting that sugar beet production remains economically viable.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 93
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing the environmental performance and sustainability of bioenergy production in Sweden: A life cycle assessment perspective
    Buonocore, Elvira
    Franzese, Pier Paolo
    Ulgiati, Sergio
    ENERGY, 2012, 37 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [42] Environmental impact and economic assessment for UK sugar beet production systems
    Tzilivakis, J
    Jaggard, K
    Lewis, KA
    May, M
    Warner, DJ
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 107 (04) : 341 - 358
  • [43] Biological wastewater treatment: a comprehensive sustainability analysis using life cycle assessment
    Kumar, Ritesh
    Patel, Kulvendra
    Singh, S. K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 196 (05)
  • [44] Energy cycle assessment of bioethanol production from sugarcane bagasse by life cycle approach using the fermentation conversion process
    Dibazar, Arman Satari
    Aliasghar, Arash
    Behzadnezhad, Asal
    Shakiba, Aria
    Pazoki, Maryam
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2024, 14 (17) : 20679 - 20698
  • [45] Application of life cycle assessment as a tool for evaluating the sustainability of contaminated sites remediation: A systematic and bibliographic analysis
    Visentin, Caroline
    da Silva Trentin, Adan William
    Braun, Adeli Beatriz
    Thome, Antonio
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 672 : 893 - 905
  • [46] Social life cycle assessment of green hydrogen production: Evaluating a projected Portuguese industrial production plant
    dos Reis, Rui A.
    Rangel, Gustavo P.
    Neto, Belmira
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 235
  • [47] A review of life cycle assessment of buildings using a systematic approach
    Nwodo, Martin N.
    Anumba, Chimay J.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 162
  • [48] Sustainability and Earth Resources: Life Cycle Assessment Modeling
    O'Shea, T.
    Golden, J. S.
    Olander, L.
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 22 (07) : 429 - 441
  • [49] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Buildings: A Scientometric Analysis
    Poderyte, Ieva
    Banaitiene, Nerija
    Banaitis, Audrius
    BUILDINGS, 2025, 15 (03)
  • [50] A new indicator for life cycle sustainability assessment of fuels
    Zhou, Zupeng
    Mo, Qiuyun
    Qin, Liancheng
    RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, PTS 1-7, 2012, 347-353 : 360 - 363