Evaluating the Sustainability of Sugar Beet Production Using Life Cycle Assessment Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Azizpanah, Amir [1 ]
Taki, Morteza [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ilam, Coll Agr, Dept Mech Biosyst, Ilam, Iran
[2] Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ Khuzestan, Fac Agr Engn & Rural Dev, Dept Agr Machinery & Mechanizat Engn, Mollasani, Iran
关键词
Energy efficiency; Sustainability; Production cost; Cobb-Douglas model; ENERGY-USE EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; WHEAT; FRUIT;
D O I
10.1007/s12355-024-01488-9
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This study aimed to investigate the energy consumption and Global Warming Potential (GWP) of sugar beet production in Cherdavel (33.7018 degrees N, 47.0194 degrees E in Ilam province) and Islamabad (34.1132 degrees N, 46.5279 degrees E in Kermanshah province), Iran. Data were collected through detailed questionnaires and in-depth interviews with farmers. Environmental impacts were assessed using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, which evaluates the environmental effects throughout its entire life cycle, from raw material extraction to disposal. The CML-IA baseline V3.08/EU25 method was used for this assessment, providing a standardized framework for impact categories such as global warming, abiotic depletion, and toxicity. The results indicated that energy consumption for sugar beet production in Cherdavel and Islamabad regions was 55,308.42 and 54,871.22 MJha-1, respectively. The energy efficiency index was calculated as 17.01 and 14.69 for Cherdavel and Islamabad, respectively. The economic analysis showed that in Cherdavel and Islamabad, the profit-to-cost ratio was 2.05 and 1.89, and the economic productivity of production was 11.41 and 10.53 kg$-1, respectively. The results of modeling with the Cobb-Douglas function, a common econometric model used to represent the relationship between inputs and outputs, showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) in Cherdavel and Islamabad regions was 0.93 and 0.96, respectively. This high R2 value indicates a strong correlation between the input variables and the output (sugar beet yield), suggesting that the model accurately represents the production process. The results showed that Global Warming Potential (GWP) in Cherdavel and Islamabad was 54.05 and 44.47 (kg CO2eq) per ton of sugar beet production, respectively. These values are relatively high compared to other crops, indicating significant greenhouse gas emissions associated with sugar beet production in these regions. Abiotic Depletion for Fossil fuels (ADF) was 435.69 and 363.19 MJ, Human Toxicity (HT) was 21.53 and 16.87 (1,4-DB eq kg), and Marine Aquatic Ecotoxicity (MAE) was 23,543.82 and 18,306.06 (1,4-DB eq kg) in Cherdavel and Islamabad, respectively. These metrics highlight the substantial environmental impacts of sugar beet production with Cherdavel showing higher values in most categories. Despite these environmental concerns, both regions demonstrated favorable economic productivity and profit-to-cost ratios, suggesting that sugar beet production remains economically viable.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 93
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT: A Systems Approach to Environmental Management and Sustainability
    Curran, Mary Ann
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2015, 111 (10) : 26 - 35
  • [32] Sustainability of biojet fuels: A multiactor life cycle assessment approach
    Agusdinata, Datu Buyung
    Zhao, Fu
    DeLaurentis, Daniel A.
    IEEE Potentials, 2012, 31 (01): : 27 - 33
  • [34] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of four alternatives for using by-products of cane sugar production
    Contreras, Ana M.
    Rosa, Elena
    Perez, Maylier
    Van Langenhove, Herman
    Dewulf, Jo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (08) : 772 - 779
  • [35] Assessment of Soil Fertility for Sugar Beet Production Using Fuzzy AHP Approach and GIS in the Northeastern region of Iran
    Bagherzadeh A.
    Gholizadeh A.
    Agricultural Research, 2018, 7 (1) : 61 - 71
  • [36] Exergetic analysis in cane sugar production in combination with Life Cycle Assessment
    Moya, Contreras
    Dominguez, Rosa
    Van Langenhove, Herman
    Herrero, Santos
    Gil, Perez
    Ledon, Casas
    Dewulf, Jo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 59 : 43 - 50
  • [37] Evaluating landfill aftercare strategies: A life cycle assessment approach
    Turner, David A.
    Beaven, Richard P.
    Woodman, Nick D.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 63 : 417 - 431
  • [38] Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production, storage, and utilization toward sustainability
    Osman, Ahmed I.
    Nasr, Mahmoud
    Mohamed, A. R.
    Abdelhaleem, Amal
    Ayati, Ali
    Farghali, Mohamed
    Al-Muhtaseb, Ala'a H.
    Al-Fatesh, Ahmed S.
    Rooney, David W.
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [39] Life cycle assessment of polycarbonate production: Proposed optimization toward sustainability
    Zhou, Xinying
    Zhai, Yijie
    Ren, Ke
    Cheng, Ziyue
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Bai, Yueyang
    Jia, Yuke
    Hong, Jinglan
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 189
  • [40] Environmental sustainability improvement in chloromethanes production based on life cycle assessment
    Zhou, Xinying
    Cheng, Ziyue
    Ren, Ke
    Zhai, Yijie
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Bai, Yueyang
    Jia, Yuke
    Hong, Jinglan
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 34 : 105 - 113