Evaluating the Sustainability of Sugar Beet Production Using Life Cycle Assessment Approach

被引:0
作者
Azizpanah, Amir [1 ]
Taki, Morteza [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ilam, Coll Agr, Dept Mech Biosyst, Ilam, Iran
[2] Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ Khuzestan, Fac Agr Engn & Rural Dev, Dept Agr Machinery & Mechanizat Engn, Mollasani, Iran
关键词
Energy efficiency; Sustainability; Production cost; Cobb-Douglas model; ENERGY-USE EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; WHEAT; FRUIT;
D O I
10.1007/s12355-024-01488-9
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This study aimed to investigate the energy consumption and Global Warming Potential (GWP) of sugar beet production in Cherdavel (33.7018 degrees N, 47.0194 degrees E in Ilam province) and Islamabad (34.1132 degrees N, 46.5279 degrees E in Kermanshah province), Iran. Data were collected through detailed questionnaires and in-depth interviews with farmers. Environmental impacts were assessed using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, which evaluates the environmental effects throughout its entire life cycle, from raw material extraction to disposal. The CML-IA baseline V3.08/EU25 method was used for this assessment, providing a standardized framework for impact categories such as global warming, abiotic depletion, and toxicity. The results indicated that energy consumption for sugar beet production in Cherdavel and Islamabad regions was 55,308.42 and 54,871.22 MJha-1, respectively. The energy efficiency index was calculated as 17.01 and 14.69 for Cherdavel and Islamabad, respectively. The economic analysis showed that in Cherdavel and Islamabad, the profit-to-cost ratio was 2.05 and 1.89, and the economic productivity of production was 11.41 and 10.53 kg$-1, respectively. The results of modeling with the Cobb-Douglas function, a common econometric model used to represent the relationship between inputs and outputs, showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) in Cherdavel and Islamabad regions was 0.93 and 0.96, respectively. This high R2 value indicates a strong correlation between the input variables and the output (sugar beet yield), suggesting that the model accurately represents the production process. The results showed that Global Warming Potential (GWP) in Cherdavel and Islamabad was 54.05 and 44.47 (kg CO2eq) per ton of sugar beet production, respectively. These values are relatively high compared to other crops, indicating significant greenhouse gas emissions associated with sugar beet production in these regions. Abiotic Depletion for Fossil fuels (ADF) was 435.69 and 363.19 MJ, Human Toxicity (HT) was 21.53 and 16.87 (1,4-DB eq kg), and Marine Aquatic Ecotoxicity (MAE) was 23,543.82 and 18,306.06 (1,4-DB eq kg) in Cherdavel and Islamabad, respectively. These metrics highlight the substantial environmental impacts of sugar beet production with Cherdavel showing higher values in most categories. Despite these environmental concerns, both regions demonstrated favorable economic productivity and profit-to-cost ratios, suggesting that sugar beet production remains economically viable.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 93
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment
    Martinez-Blanco, Julia
    Lehmann, Annekatrin
    Munoz, Pere
    Anton, Assumpcio
    Traverso, Marzia
    Rieradevall, Joan
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 69 : 34 - 48
  • [32] Mapping sustainability assessment with the project life cycle
    Thomson, Craig S.
    El-Haram, Mohamed A.
    Emmanuel, Rohinton
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 164 (02) : 143 - 157
  • [33] Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Valdivia, Sonia
    Backes, Jana Gerta
    Traverso, Marzia
    Sonnemann, Guido
    Cucurachi, Stefano
    Guinee, Jeroen B.
    Schaubroeck, Thomas
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    Leroy-Parmentier, Noemie
    Ugaya, Cassia
    Pena, Claudia
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    Inaba, Atsushi
    Amaral, Milena
    Berger, Markus
    Dvarioniene, Jolanta
    Vakhitova, Tatiana
    Benoit-Norris, Catherine
    Prox, Martina
    Foolmaun, Rajendra
    Goedkoop, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (09) : 1900 - 1905
  • [34] Geotraceability and life cycle assessment in environmental life cycle management: towards sustainability
    Ometto, Aldo
    Batistella, Mateus
    Guelere Filho, Americo
    Chuzel, Gerard
    Viau, Alain
    COMPLEX SYSTEMS CONCURRENT ENGINEERING: COLLABORATION, TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2007, : 673 - +
  • [35] Holistic and integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of prospective biomass to liquid production in Germany
    Zeug, Walther
    Yupanqui, Karla Raquel Gan
    Bezama, Alberto
    Thran, Daniela
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 418
  • [36] Life cycle assessment applications to electrical energy production: a possible sustainability analysis tool
    Iannone, F.
    Zaninelli, D.
    2007 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-10, 2007, : 3029 - 3034
  • [37] Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of goat cheese production in Brazil: a path towards sustainability
    Soares Cabral, Caroline Ferreira
    Elabras Veiga, Lilian Bechara
    Araujo, Marcelo Guimaraes
    Quiterio de Souza, Simone Lorena
    LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 129
  • [38] Impact of agrochemical emission models on the environmental assessment of paddy rice production using life cycle assessment approach
    Rezaei, Mojtaba
    Soheilifard, Farshad
    Keshvari, Athena
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2025, 47 (01) : 4079 - 4094
  • [39] Evaluation of hazelnut production in Turkiye in environment, energy and economy using life cycle assessment approach
    Temizyurek-Arslan, Merve
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 892
  • [40] Evaluation of energy demand and the sustainability of different bioethanol production processes from sugar beet
    Santek, Bozidar
    Gwehenberger, Gernot
    Santek, Mirela Ivancic
    Narodoslawsky, Michael
    Horvat, Predrag
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2010, 54 (11) : 872 - 877