Evaluating the Sustainability of Sugar Beet Production Using Life Cycle Assessment Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Azizpanah, Amir [1 ]
Taki, Morteza [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ilam, Coll Agr, Dept Mech Biosyst, Ilam, Iran
[2] Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ Khuzestan, Fac Agr Engn & Rural Dev, Dept Agr Machinery & Mechanizat Engn, Mollasani, Iran
关键词
Energy efficiency; Sustainability; Production cost; Cobb-Douglas model; ENERGY-USE EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; WHEAT; FRUIT;
D O I
10.1007/s12355-024-01488-9
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This study aimed to investigate the energy consumption and Global Warming Potential (GWP) of sugar beet production in Cherdavel (33.7018 degrees N, 47.0194 degrees E in Ilam province) and Islamabad (34.1132 degrees N, 46.5279 degrees E in Kermanshah province), Iran. Data were collected through detailed questionnaires and in-depth interviews with farmers. Environmental impacts were assessed using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, which evaluates the environmental effects throughout its entire life cycle, from raw material extraction to disposal. The CML-IA baseline V3.08/EU25 method was used for this assessment, providing a standardized framework for impact categories such as global warming, abiotic depletion, and toxicity. The results indicated that energy consumption for sugar beet production in Cherdavel and Islamabad regions was 55,308.42 and 54,871.22 MJha-1, respectively. The energy efficiency index was calculated as 17.01 and 14.69 for Cherdavel and Islamabad, respectively. The economic analysis showed that in Cherdavel and Islamabad, the profit-to-cost ratio was 2.05 and 1.89, and the economic productivity of production was 11.41 and 10.53 kg$-1, respectively. The results of modeling with the Cobb-Douglas function, a common econometric model used to represent the relationship between inputs and outputs, showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) in Cherdavel and Islamabad regions was 0.93 and 0.96, respectively. This high R2 value indicates a strong correlation between the input variables and the output (sugar beet yield), suggesting that the model accurately represents the production process. The results showed that Global Warming Potential (GWP) in Cherdavel and Islamabad was 54.05 and 44.47 (kg CO2eq) per ton of sugar beet production, respectively. These values are relatively high compared to other crops, indicating significant greenhouse gas emissions associated with sugar beet production in these regions. Abiotic Depletion for Fossil fuels (ADF) was 435.69 and 363.19 MJ, Human Toxicity (HT) was 21.53 and 16.87 (1,4-DB eq kg), and Marine Aquatic Ecotoxicity (MAE) was 23,543.82 and 18,306.06 (1,4-DB eq kg) in Cherdavel and Islamabad, respectively. These metrics highlight the substantial environmental impacts of sugar beet production with Cherdavel showing higher values in most categories. Despite these environmental concerns, both regions demonstrated favorable economic productivity and profit-to-cost ratios, suggesting that sugar beet production remains economically viable.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 93
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Combined application of life cycle assessment and neural network model for modeling energy and environmental emissions in sugar beet production
    Mehdi, Imane
    Chmarkhi, Abdelhalim
    Ammari, Mohammed
    Ben Allal, Laila
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 24
  • [22] Note on the life cycle of the sugar-beet webworm
    Marsh, HO
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1917, 10 : 543 - 544
  • [23] Sustainability assessment of sugarcane and sugar beet production systems by energy and exergy approaches: a case study
    Asakereh, Abbas
    Kiani, Mostafa Kiani Deh
    Soleymani, Mohsen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2023, 40 (01) : 74 - 90
  • [24] Environmental sustainability of the clementine production systems in Italy and Spain:. an approach based on Life Cycle Assessment
    Nicolo, B. F.
    De Salvo, M. C.
    Ramirez-Sanz, C.
    Estruch, A., V
    Sanjuan, N.
    Falcone, G.
    Strano, A.
    ECOSYSTEMS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT X, 2015, 192 : 173 - 184
  • [25] Analyzing sustainability in bread production: a life cycle assessment approach to energy, exergy and environmental footprint
    Rafiee M.
    Abbaspour-Fard M.H.
    Heidari A.
    Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2024, 34 (46949-46964): : 46949 - 46964
  • [26] Sustainability evaluation of pasteurized milk production with a life cycle assessment approach: An Iranian case study
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Khoshnevisan, Benyamin
    Mohammadi, Issa
    Aghbashlo, Mortaza
    Mousazadeh, Hossein
    Clarkb, Sean
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 562 : 614 - 627
  • [27] Measuring Sustainability: Life Cycle Approach to Regional Sustainability Assessment on Electricity Options
    Li, Tianqi
    Wang, Yaodong
    Roskilly, Anthony Paul
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR STUDENTS ON APPLIED ENGINEERING (ICSAE), 2016, : 297 - 302
  • [28] Life cycle sustainability assessment
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (04): : 373 - 376
  • [29] Life cycle sustainability assessment
    Alessandra Zamagni
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 373 - 376
  • [30] Sustainability Approach of Recycled Denim Fabrics with a Life Cycle Assessment
    Karagol, Hakan
    Kadem, Fuesun Doba
    Olucak, Halil Ibrahim
    Kertmen, Mehmet
    Ozdemir, Sehpal
    FIBRES & TEXTILES IN EASTERN EUROPE, 2024, 32 (02) : 57 - 63