Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Signal Detection and Ascertaining Precision of Adverse Event Rates in Clinical Trials

被引:0
|
作者
Diao, Guoqing [1 ]
Gamalo, Margaret [2 ]
Tiwari, Ram [3 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, 800 22nd St NW,Suite 7560, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] Pfizer Inc, Inflammat & Immunol, New York, NY USA
[3] Bristol Myers Squibb, Stat Methodol, Berkeley Hts, NJ USA
来源
STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH | 2024年
关键词
Bonferroni correction; Common adverse reactions; Hypothesis testing; Influence functions; Rademacher random variables; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; TARGET;
D O I
10.1080/19466315.2024.2388523
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The marketing authorization of a medicinal product is contingent upon demonstration of safety and efficacy in support of the product's labeled conditions of use. To demonstrate safety, one group of adverse events that requires detailed consideration is common adverse reactions (ARs). ARs and their frequency are reported in prescription drug labeling in the US and EU. The determination of these adverse reactions generally takes a simple approach-usually, inclusion is through the frequency of reporting and whether the adverse event (AE) rate for the drug exceeds the placebo rate. This standard method does not account for confounders or multiplicity. To overcome these limitations, we propose a Monte Carlo approach to detect drug safety signals in clinical trials. We fit regression models incorporating covariates to assess the drug effect on the rate of AEs. Adjustment for multiplicity is carried out through the construction of simultaneous confidence intervals accounting for arbitrary correlations. A computationally efficient multiplier bootstrap approach using the Rademacher sequences is developed to generate random samples from the joint distribution of the estimators for all the AE rates. Compared to Bonferroni-based methods, the proposed method leads to narrower simultaneous confidence intervals and is more powerful in detecting potential safety signals.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Aggregation of Adverse Event Terms for Signal Detection and Labeling in Clinical Trials
    Zink, Richard C.
    Lyzinski, Rebecca
    Mann, Geoffrey
    DRUG SAFETY, 2025, : 595 - 606
  • [2] THE CASE FOR CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS IN CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIALS
    BORENSTEIN, M
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1994, 15 (05): : 411 - 428
  • [3] Statistical methods leveraging the hierarchical structure of adverse events for signal detection in clinical trials: a scoping review of the methodological literature
    de Abreu Nunes, Laetitia
    Hooper, Richard
    Mcgettigan, Patricia
    Phillips, Rachel
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [4] Tree-temporal scan statistics for safety signal detection in vaccine clinical trials
    Haguinet, Francois
    Tibaldi, Fabian
    Dessart, Christophe
    Bate, Andrew
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2024, 23 (06) : 813 - 836
  • [5] Extended likelihood ratio test-based methods for signal detection in a drug class with application to FDA's adverse event reporting system database
    Zhao, Yueqin
    Yi, Min
    Tiwari, Ram C.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (03) : 876 - 890