Learning from farmers on potentials and limits for an agroecological transition: a participatory action research in Western Sicily

被引:1
|
作者
Conte, Luigi [1 ,2 ]
Prakofjewa, Julia [1 ]
Floridia, Tiziana [1 ]
Stocco, Alice [1 ]
Comar, Vito [2 ]
Gonella, Francesco [3 ,4 ]
Lo Cascio, Martina [5 ]
机构
[1] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Environm Sci Informat & Stat, Venice, Italy
[2] Greater Dourados Fed Univ, Fac Biol & Environm Sci, Dourados, MS, Brazil
[3] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Mol Sci & Nanosyst, Venice, Italy
[4] New Inst Ctr Environm Humanities NICHE, Venice, Italy
[5] Univ Palermo, Dept Culture & Soc, Palermo, Italy
关键词
agroecology; local knowledge; participatory action research; systems thinking; agroecological transition; small farmers; complexity; socio-ecological systems; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FOOD SYSTEMS; ADAPTATION; KNOWLEDGE; QUALITY; REGION;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2024.1347915
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Like many Mediterranean areas, the Italian island of Sicily faces multiple environmental pressures such as soil loss, fire hazards, and extreme meteorological events, all of which negatively impact local food systems. In response to these threats, a re-thinking of local agriculture and natural resource management is increasingly needed. Agroecology is recognized as a robust proposal for building more resilient food systems grounded in farmers' knowledge and practices. However, agroecological farming experiences struggle to operate and survive in Sicily due to unfavorable political-cultural, environmental, and socio-economic conditions. Learning from small-scale farmers about the ways they perceive, understand, and overcome structural limits and environmental constraints is key for a transition to agroecology in the study area. Understanding its potentials and limits is essential for planning and identifying transformative actions. We approached the problem by adopting a participatory action research methodology involving selected groups of farmers in Western Sicily. We applied a co-creative approach and developed a systemic analysis of the socio-ecological narratives to identify possible leverage points for a transition to agroecology in the study area. We identified a local potential for shifting the current system of water and fire hazards management to new systems of participatory land stewardship. To be effective, these systems should support agroecological farmers' income by altering social practices related to food and reducing the influence of dominant agribusiness actors. Our findings indicate that implementing solutions based on the circulation of local ecological knowledge within systems of participatory guarantees can favor the development of solidarity economies and mutualistic relations between farmers, scientists, and communities. Our work suggests that scientists' facilitation and knowledge co-creation might be of key importance in structuring local, more sustainable food systems.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agroecological Transitions: A Systematic Review of Research Approaches and Prospects for Participatory Action Methods
    Sachet, Erwan
    Mertz, Ole
    Le Coq, Jean-Francois
    Cruz-Garcia, Gisella S.
    Francesconi, Wendy
    Bonin, Muriel
    Quintero, Marcela
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2021, 5
  • [2] Tradeoffs of a rising agroecological practice: addressing uncertainty around tarping with participatory action research and mixed methods
    Kinnebrew, Eva
    Molander, Carlin K.
    Warren, Sophia Wilcox
    Horner, Catherine E.
    Izzo, Victor M.
    Lewins, Scott A.
    Maden, Rebecca
    Galford, Gillian L.
    Mendez, V. Ernesto
    AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 47 (03) : 355 - 381
  • [3] 'No limits': Doing participatory action research with young people in Northumberland
    Bostock, J
    Freeman, J
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 13 (06) : 464 - 474
  • [4] An educational framework for participatory action learning and action research (PALAR)
    Zuber-Skerritt, Ortrun
    EDUCATIONAL ACTION RESEARCH, 2018, 26 (04) : 513 - 532
  • [5] Farmers, planning and Agroecological transition: insights from the special region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    Pandangwati, Sri T.
    Cooke, Benjamin
    Neave, Melissa
    AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHER, 2024, 55 (02) : 229 - 257
  • [6] Integrating the L (learning) into PAR (participatory action research)
    Gentry, Jayne
    Lawrence, David
    Baskerville, Henry
    Burrett, Brook
    Lester, David
    Silburn, Cameron
    Sands, Douglas
    Macpherson, Isabella
    Agius, Peter
    RURAL EXTENSION AND INNOVATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2024, 20 (01):
  • [7] Reflection-in-and-on-Action in Participatory Action Research: Toward Assessment for Learning
    Penny Singh
    Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2008, 21 : 241 - 251
  • [8] Reflection-in-and-on-action in participatory action research:: Toward assessment for Learning
    Singh, Penny
    SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2008, 21 (03) : 241 - 251
  • [9] Science Learning from the School Garden through Participatory Action Research in Nepal
    Acharya, Kamal Prasad
    Budhathoki, Chitra Bahadur
    Acharya, Milan
    QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2022, 27 (06) : 1623 - 1634
  • [10] Transition Discoveries: Participatory Action Research to Design Pathways to Success
    Kester, Joan
    Flanagan, Matthew F.
    Stella, Julie
    CAREER DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSITION FOR EXCEPTIONAL INDIVIDUALS, 2022, 45 (01) : 31 - 43