Socialscape Ecology: Integrating Social Features and Processes into Spatially Explicit Marine Conservation Planning

被引:0
|
作者
Baker-Medard, Merrill [1 ]
Concannon, Katherine [1 ]
Gantt, Courtney [1 ]
Moen, Sierra [1 ]
White, Easton R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Middlebury Coll, Environm Studies Program, Middlebury, VT 05753 USA
[2] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Biol Sci, Durham, NH 03824 USA
关键词
marine conservation; Marxan; fisheries; marine protected area; conservation planning; spatial planning and design; trade-offs; human geography; PROTECTED AREAS; SOCIOECONOMIC DATA; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; SCIENCE; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; IMPACT; RIGHTS; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.3390/su16146078
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Conservation planning is the process of locating, implementing, and maintaining areas that are managed to promote the persistence of biodiversity, ecosystem function, and human use. In this review, we analyze the ways in which social processes have been integrated into Marxan, a spatially explicit conservation planning tool used as one step in a broader process to select the location and size of protected areas. Drawing on 89 peer-reviewed articles published between 2005 and 2020, we analyzed the ways in which human activity, values, and processes are spatialized in the environment, something we call socialscape ecology. A socialscape ecology approach to conservation planning considers not only the spatial configuration of human activity in a land or seascape but also the underlying drivers of these activities, how resource use rights and access operate in an area, and how resource users contribute to data collection and decision making. Our results show that there has been a small but statistically significant increase in the total number of cost variables into Marxan analysis over time, with uneven performance across seven of the nine categories assessed. One notable area of improvement has been the increase over time in number of studies integrating socio-environmental change (e.g., climate change) in their analysis. Including accurate, context-specific, and detailed accounts of social features and processes within land and seascapes is essential for developing conservation plans that are cost-effective, ecologically sound, socially desirable, and just.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Comparing Spatially Explicit Ecological and Social Values for Natural Areas to Identify Effective Conservation Strategies
    Bryan, Brett Anthony
    Raymond, Christopher Mark
    Crossman, Neville David
    King, Darran
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) : 172 - 181
  • [2] Integrating connectivity and climate change into marine conservation planning
    Magris, Rafael A.
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Weeks, Rebecca
    Ban, Natalie C.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 170 : 207 - 221
  • [3] Integrating social science into conservation planning
    Niemiec, Rebecca M.
    Gruby, Rebecca
    Quartuch, Michael
    Cavaliere, Christina T.
    Teel, Tara L.
    Crooks, Kevin
    Salerno, Jonathan
    Solomon, Jennifer N.
    Jones, Kelly W.
    Gavin, Michael
    Lavoie, Anna
    Stronza, Amanda
    Meth, Leah
    Enrici, Ash
    Lanter, Katie
    Browne, Christine
    Proctor, Jonathan
    Manfredo, Michael
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 262
  • [4] A spatially explicit risk approach to support marine spatial planning in the German EEZ
    Gimpel, Antje
    Stelzenmueller, Vanessa
    Cormier, Roland
    Floeter, Jens
    Temming, Axel
    MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2013, 86 : 56 - 69
  • [5] Spatially explicit species distribution models: A missed opportunity in conservation planning?
    Domisch, Sami
    Friedrichs, Martin
    Hein, Thomas
    Borgwardt, Florian
    Wetzig, Annett
    Jaehnig, Sonja C.
    Langhans, Simone D.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2019, 25 (05) : 758 - 769
  • [6] Interactions Between Spatially Explicit Conservation and Management Measures: Implications for the Governance of Marine Protected Areas
    Carcamo, P. Francisco
    Gaymer, Carlos F.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 52 (06) : 1355 - 1368
  • [7] Integrating family planning service provision into community-based marine conservation
    Harris, Alasdair
    Mohan, Vik
    Flanagan, Maggie
    Hill, Rebecca
    ORYX, 2012, 46 (02) : 179 - 186
  • [8] Landscape design: Integrating ecological, social, and economic considerations into conservation planning
    Bartuszevige, Anne M.
    Taylor, Kyle
    Daniels, Alex
    Carter, Michael F.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2016, 40 (03): : 411 - 422
  • [9] Characterizing Spatial Uncertainty when Integrating Social Data in Conservation Planning
    Lechner, A. M.
    Raymond, C. M.
    Adams, V. M.
    Polyakov, M.
    Gordon, A.
    Rhodes, J. R.
    Mills, M.
    Stein, A.
    Ives, C. D.
    Lefroy, E. C.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (06) : 1497 - 1511
  • [10] Integrating spatially realistic infrastructure impacts into conservation planning to inform strategic environmental assessment
    Tulloch, Ayesha I. T.
    Gordon, Ascelin
    Runge, Claire A.
    Rhodes, Jonathan R.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2019, 12 (04):