Decoding machine learning in nursing research: A scoping review of effective algorithms

被引:0
作者
Choi, Jeeyae [1 ]
Lee, Hanjoo [2 ]
Kim-Godwin, Yeounsoo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Wilmington, Coll Hlth & Human Serv, Sch Nursing, 601 South Coll Rd, Wilmington, NC 28403 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Med, Joint Biomed Engn Dept, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; machine learning; machine learning algorithms; performance validation; scoping review; MEDICAL-EDUCATION-RESEARCH; HEALTH-CARE; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/jnu.13026
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction: The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has revolutionized healthcare, particularly through the integration of AI into health information systems. This transformation has significantly impacted the roles of nurses and nurse practitioners, prompting extensive research to assess the effectiveness of AI-integrated systems. This scoping review focuses on machine learning (ML) used in nursing, specifically investigating ML algorithms, model evaluation methods, areas of focus related to nursing, and the most effective ML algorithms. Design: The scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Methods: A structured search was performed across seven databases according to PRISMA-ScR: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, OVID, PsycINFO, and ProQuest. The quality of the final reviewed studies was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). Results: Twenty-six articles published between 2019 and 2023 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 46% of studies were conducted in the US. The average MERSQI score was 12.2, indicative of moderate- to high-quality studies. The most used ML algorithm was Random Forest. The four second-most used were logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, decision tree, and support vector machine. Most ML models were evaluated by calculating sensitivity (recall)/specificity, accuracy, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the ROC (AUROC), and positive/negative prediction value (precision). Half of the studies focused on nursing staff or students and hospital readmission or emergency department visits. Only 11 articles reported the most effective ML algorithm(s). Conclusion:The scoping review provides insights into the current status of ML research in nursing and recognition of its significance in nursing research, confirming the benefits of ML in healthcare. Recommendations include incorporating experimental designs in research studies to optimize the use of ML models across various nursing domains.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 129
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving Triage Accuracy in Prehospital EmergencyTelemedicine:Scoping Review of Machine Learning-Enhanced Approaches
    Raff, Daniel
    Stewart, Kurtis
    Yang, Michelle Christie
    Shang, Jessie
    Cressman, Sonya
    Tam, Roger
    Wong, Jessica
    Tammemaegi, Martin C.
    Ho, Kendall
    INTERACTIVE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 13
  • [32] Intersectionality in nursing research: A scoping review
    Sherman, Athena D. F.
    Febres-Cordero, Sarah
    Johnson, Kalisha Bonds
    Clark, Kristen D.
    Klepper, Meredith
    Duroseau, Brenice
    Lin, Yufen
    Zhang, Wenhui
    Coleman, Mercy
    Prakash, Diane
    Daniel, Gaea A.
    Chand, Arzina Tabassum
    Kalu, Ugo
    Tarter, Robin
    Allgood, Sarah
    Cohen, Sydney
    Kelly, Ursula
    Balthazar, Monique
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES, 2023, 5
  • [33] Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthognathic surgery: A scoping review
    Mohaideen, Kaja
    Negi, Anurag
    Verma, Dinesh Kumar
    Kumar, Neeraj
    Sennimalai, Karthik
    Negi, Amita
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 123 (06) : E962 - E972
  • [34] Exploring Machine Learning Applications in Pediatric Asthma Management: Scoping Review
    Ojha, Tanvi
    Patel, Atushi
    Sivapragasam, Krishihan
    Sharma, Radha
    Vosoughi, Tina
    Skidmore, Becky
    Pinto, Andrew D.
    Hosseini, Banafshe
    JMIR AI, 2024, 3
  • [35] Machine learning algorithms for predicting membrane bioreactors performance: A review
    Muniz de Queiroz, Marina
    Moreira, Victor Rezende
    Amaral, Míriam Cristina Santos
    Oliveira, Sílvia Maria Alves Corrêa
    Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 380
  • [36] Fraud Detection and Prevention Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Review
    Priya, G. Jaculine
    Saradha, S.
    2021 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS (ICEES), 2021, : 564 - 568
  • [37] Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus: Systematic Review
    Maile, Howard
    Li, Ji-Peng Olivia
    Gore, Daniel
    Leucci, Marcello
    Mulholland, Padraig
    Hau, Scott
    Szabo, Anita
    Moghul, Ismail
    Balaskas, Konstantinos
    Fujinami, Kaoru
    Hysi, Pirro
    Davidson, Alice
    Liskova, Petra
    Hardcastle, Alison
    Tuft, Stephen
    Pontikos, Nikolas
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 9 (12)
  • [38] Implications of Big Data Analytics, AI, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in the Health Care System of Bangladesh: Scoping Review
    Alam, Md Ashraful
    Sajib, Md Refat Uz Zaman
    Rahman, Fariya
    Ether, Saraban
    Hanson, Molly
    Sayeed, Abu
    Akter, Ema
    Nusrat, Nowrin
    Islam, Tanjeena Tahrin
    Raza, Sahar
    Tanvir, K. M.
    Chisti, Mohammod Jobayer
    Rahman, Qazi Sadeq-ur
    Hossain, Akm
    Layek, Ma
    Zaman, Asaduz
    Rana, Juwel
    Rahman, Syed Moshfiqur
    El Arifeen, Shams
    Rahman, Ahmed Ehsanur
    Ahmed, Anisuddin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [39] Medical informed machine learning: A scoping review and future research directions
    Leiser, Florian
    Rank, Sascha
    Schmidt-Kraepelin, Manuel
    Thiebes, Scott
    Sunyaev, Ali
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2023, 145
  • [40] The use of machine learning algorithms in recommender systems: A systematic review
    Portugal, Ivens
    Alencar, Paulo
    Cowan, Donald
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 97 : 205 - 227