Randomized trial of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of 13.2 mg intranasal epinephrine treatment in congestion

被引:3
作者
Dworaczyk, David A. [1 ]
Hunt, Allen [2 ]
Di Spirito, Mike [3 ]
Lor, Mary [3 ]
Rance, Karen [1 ]
van Haarst, Aernout D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Bryn Pharm, Lebanon, NJ USA
[2] Celerion, Lincoln, NE USA
[3] Celerion, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Celerion, Belfast, North Ireland
关键词
PRACTICE PARAMETER UPDATE; ANAPHYLAXIS; MANAGEMENT; ALLERGY; RISK; FOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.anai.2024.04.033
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Nasal congestion could affect the absorption of an epinephrine nasal spray (ENS). Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetics of 13.2 mg ENS with nasal congestion vs without congestion and vs Methods: This phase I, open-label, 4-period randomized crossover study enrolled 51 healthy adults with seasonal allergies into cohorts that received a single dose of 13.2 mg ENS (NDS1C; Bryn Pharma, Lebanon, New Jersey) administered as 2 consecutive sprays in either opposite nostrils (cohort 1) or the same nostril (cohort 2). Both cohorts received 13.2 mg ENS with and without nasal allergen challenge (NAC), 0.3 mg IM epinephrine by autoinjector, and 0.5 mg IM epinephrine by manual syringe (MS). Results: The ENS after NAC resulted in higher extent and peak exposures and more rapid time to maximum plasma concentration vs ENS without NAC and IM treatments. In cohort 1, the maximum observed baselineadjusted epinephrine plasma concentration (pg/mL) of ENS with NAC, IM autoinjector, IM MS, or ENS without NAC was 458.0, 279.0, 364.2, and 270.1, respectively, and in cohort 2 was 436.3, 228.2, 322.3, and 250.8, respectively. The maximum observed baseline-adjusted epinephrine plasma concentration geometric mean ratio (90% CI) for ENS with NAC vs without NAC in cohort 1 was 170% (123%-234%), and in cohort 2 was 174% (115%-263%). In cohort 1, the time to maximum plasma concentration was 15, 21, 45, and 25 minutes, respectively, and in cohort 2 was 18, 20, 45, and 20 minutes, respectively (P < .01 for ENS with NAC vs IM MS). The postdose mean heart rate and blood pressure remained stable and relatively similar to predose values regardless of plasma epinephrine concentration. Mild nausea and headache were the most common adverse events with ENS. Conclusion: The 13.2 mg ENS with congestion exhibited enhanced absorption vs IM treatments and ENS without congestion and seemed to be well tolerated. There was no clinically impactful relationship between pharmacodynamic effects and plasma epinephrine concentration. (c) 2024 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 193.e2
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, data on file from a survey conducted by CeraVe
[2]  
[Anonymous], Allergic rhinitis: developing drug products for treatment
[3]   Further fatalities caused by anaphylactic reactions to food, 2001-2006 [J].
Bock, S. Allan ;
Munoz-Furlong, Anne ;
Sampson, Hugh A. .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2007, 119 (04) :1016-1018
[4]  
Dworaczyk DA, 2023, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: Global, V3
[5]   The Allergic Rhinitis - Clinical Investigator Collaborative (AR-CIC): nasal allergen challenge protocol optimization for studying AR pathophysiology and evaluating novel therapies [J].
Ellis, Anne K. ;
Soliman, Mena ;
Steacy, Lisa ;
Boulay, Marie-Eve ;
Boulet, Louis-Philippe ;
Keith, Paul K. ;
Vliagoftis, Harissios ;
Waserman, Susan ;
Neighbour, Helen .
ALLERGY ASTHMA AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 11
[6]   Physicians prescribe adrenaline autoinjectors, do parents use them when needed? [J].
Esenboga, S. ;
Kahveci, M. ;
Cetinkaya, P. G. ;
Sahiner, U. M. ;
Soyer, O. ;
Buyuktiryaki, B. ;
Sekerel, B. E. .
ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA, 2020, 48 (01) :3-7
[7]   Early Treatment of Food-Induced Anaphylaxis with Epinephrine Is Associated with a Lower Risk of Hospitalization [J].
Fleming, Jude T. ;
Clark, Sunday ;
Camargo, Carlos A., Jr. ;
Rudders, Susan A. .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2015, 3 (01) :57-62
[8]   Epinephrine auto-injector use in adolescents at risk of anaphylaxis: a qualitative study in Scotland, UK [J].
Gallagher, M. ;
Worth, A. ;
Cunningham-Burley, S. ;
Sheikh, A. .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2011, 41 (06) :869-877
[9]   Oral and nasal provocation test in chicken egg allergy-case report [J].
Krzych-Falta, E. ;
Wojas, O. ;
Samel-Kowalik, P. ;
Samolinski, B. ;
Sybilski, A. ;
Bialek, S. .
ALLERGY ASTHMA AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 19 (01)
[10]   Anaphylaxis-a practice parameter update 2015 [J].
Lieberman, Phillip ;
Nicklas, Richard A. ;
Randolph, Christopher ;
Oppenheimer, John ;
Bernstein, David ;
Bernstein, Jonathan ;
Ellis, Anne ;
Golden, David B. K. ;
Greenberger, Paul ;
Kemp, Steven ;
Khan, David ;
Ledford, Dennis ;
Lieberman, Jay ;
Metcalfe, Dean ;
Nowak-Wegrzyn, Anna ;
Sicherer, Scott ;
Wallace, Dana ;
Blessing-Moore, Joann ;
Lang, David ;
Portnoy, Jay M. ;
Schuller, Diane ;
Spector, Sheldon ;
Tilles, Stephen A. .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 115 (05) :341-384