Multi-objective optimization of the spatial layout of green infrastructures with cost-effectiveness analysis under climate change scenarios

被引:5
作者
Zhang, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Wen [1 ]
Feng, Qi [1 ]
Zeng, Jianjun [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Ecoenvironm & Resources, Key Lab Ecol Safety & Sustainable Dev Arid Lands, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou City Univ, Sch Environm & Urban Construct, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[4] Xian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Ecohydraul Northwest Arid Reg China, Xian 710048, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Climate change; Multi-objective optimization; Layout design; SWMM model; Cost-effectiveness; LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT; MODELS; MECHANISMS; MITIGATION; STRATEGIES; BENEFITS; DESIGNS; ROOFS; CITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174851
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green infrastructure (GI) plays a significant role in alleviating urban flooding risk caused by urbanization and climate change. Due to space and financial limitations, the successful implementation of GI relies heavily on its layout design, and there is an increasing trend in using multi-objective optimization to support decision-making in GI planning. However, little is known about the hydrological effects of synchronously optimizing the size, location, and connection of GI under climate change. This study proposed a framework to optimize the size, location, and connection of typical GI facilities under climate change by combining the modified non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) and storm water management model (SWMM). The results showed that optimizing the size, location, and connection of GI facilities significantly increases the maximum reduction rate of runoff and peak flow by 13.4 %-24.5 % and 3.3 %-18 %, respectively, compared to optimizing only the size and location of GI. In the optimized results, most of the runoff from building roofs flew toward green space. Permeable pavement accounted for the highest average proportion of GI implementation area in optimal layouts, accounting for 29.8 %-54.2 % of road area. The average cost-effectiveness (C/E) values decreased from 16 %/105 5 Yuan under the historical period scenario to 14.3 %/105 5 Yuan and 14 %/105 5 Yuan under the two shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs), SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5, respectively. These results can help in understanding the optimization layout and cost-effectiveness of GI under climate change, and the proposed framework can enhance the adaptability of cities to climate change by providing specific cost-effective GI layout design.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-Objective Optimization of Resilient Design of the Multipurpose Reservoir in Conditions of Uncertain Climate Change
    Paseka, Stanislav
    Kapelan, Zoran
    Marton, Daniel
    WATER, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [32] Optimization of the integrated green-gray-blue system to deal with urban flood under multi-objective decision-making
    Chen, Jiaxuan
    Wang, Sisi
    Wu, Ruobing
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 89 (02) : 434 - 453
  • [33] Multi-objective optimization of green roof spatial layout in high-density urban areas-A case study of Xiamen Island, China
    Dong, Jing
    Guo, Ruonan
    Lin, Meixia
    Guo, Fei
    Zheng, Xing
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2024, 115
  • [34] A multi-objective optimization model for the life-cycle cost analysis and retrofitting planning of buildings
    Wang, Bo
    Xia, Xiaohua
    Zhang, Jiangfeng
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 77 : 227 - 235
  • [35] A Low-Impact Development-Based Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Regional Water Resource Management under Impacts of Climate Change
    Bao, Zhe
    Yang, Hansheng
    Li, Wei
    Xu, Ye
    Huang, Guohe
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2020, 8
  • [36] MULTI-OBJECTIVE ENERGY-NOISE WIND FARM LAYOUT OPTIMIZATION UNDER LAND USE CONSTRAINTS
    Sorkhabi, Sami Yamani Douzi
    Romero, David A.
    Yan, Gary Kai
    Gu, Michelle Dao
    Moran, Joaquin
    Morgenroth, Michael
    Amon, Cristina H.
    ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2014, VOL 6B, 2015,
  • [37] Multi-objective optimization for cost-efficient and resilient machining under tool wear
    Wilson J.P.
    Shen Z.
    Awasthi U.
    Bollas G.M.
    Gupta S.
    Journal of Advanced Manufacturing and Processing, 2022, 4 (04):
  • [38] Multi-objective optimization analysis of construction management site layout based on improved genetic algorithm
    Yin, Hui
    SYSTEMS AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2024, 6
  • [39] Achieving Sustainability and Cost-Effectiveness in Power Generation: Multi-Objective Dispatch of Solar, Wind, and Hydro Units
    Akbarabadi, Mohammad Lotfi
    Sirjani, Reza
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [40] Assessing the propagation of uncertainties in multi-objective optimization for agro-ecosystem adaptation to climate change
    Holzkaemper, A.
    Klein, T.
    Seppelt, R.
    Fuhrer, J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 66 : 27 - 35