The Online Privacy Divide: Testing Resource and Identity Explanations for Racial/Ethnic Differences in Privacy Concerns and Privacy Management Behaviors on Social Media

被引:3
作者
Wang, Laurent H. [1 ]
Metzger, Miriam J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Commun, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
privacy management; digital inequality; race/ethnicity; privacy self-efficacy; discrimination; institutional trust; social media; SELF-DISCLOSURE; TRUST; INTERNET; INTERSECTIONALITY; FACEBOOK; ADOPTION; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1177/00936502241273157
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Do existing social inequalities translate into social media privacy management? This study examined racial/ethnic differences in privacy concerns and privacy management behaviors on social media to evaluate empirical evidence for an online privacy divide in the U.S. In addition, we tested two prominent theoretical perspectives-resource-based and identity-based explanations-for such divides. Results from an online survey (N = 1,401) revealed that compared to White social media users, Latinx and Asian users reported higher horizontal and vertical privacy concerns, Latinx users employed horizontal privacy management strategies more frequently, Black users reported higher horizontal and vertical privacy self-efficacy, and Latinx users reported higher vertical privacy self-efficacy. While unequal distribution of resources (i.e., socioeconomic status) explained some differences among Asian (vs. White) participants, identity-based factor (i.e., perceived discrimination) served to motivate cautious privacy management among Black participants. Theoretical contributions to the privacy and marginalization literature are discussed. Practical implications are provided.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]  
Altman I., 1975, Environmental and Social Behaviour: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Census bureau releases new educational attainment data
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, MANY BLACK ASIAN AME
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association 2020: the official guide to APA style, V7th, P131, DOI [DOI 10.1037/0000165-000, https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, DISCRIMINATION AM EX
[6]  
Asian Pacific Policy and Planning Council, 2020, Stop AAPI hate
[7]  
Auxier B, 2019, Americans and privacy: Concerned, confused and feeling lack of control over their personal information
[8]   Online Privacy Concerns and Privacy Management: A Meta-Analytical Review [J].
Baruh, Lemi ;
Secinti, Ekin ;
Cemalcilar, Zeynep .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2017, 67 (01) :26-53
[9]   Double lockdown: The effects of digital exclusion on undocumented immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Bastick, Zach ;
Mallet-Garcia, Marie .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2022, 24 (02) :365-383
[10]   Towards an integration of individualistic, networked, and institutional approaches to online disclosure and privacy in a networked ecology [J].
Bazarova, Natalya N. ;
Masur, Philipp K. .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 36 :118-123