Determinants of disposition effect in the real estate market: Evidence from Taiwan

被引:0
|
作者
Chao, Ching-Hsiang [1 ]
Chang, Chuang-Chang [2 ]
Chen, Tsung-Yu [3 ]
Wu, Zhen-Xing [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Putian Univ, Fujian Key Lab Financial Informat Proc, Putian 351100, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Finance, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Feng Chia Univ, Dept Finance, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Finance, Nanhu Ave, Wuhan 430073, Peoples R China
[5] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Innovat & Talent Base Digital Technol & Finance, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
Disposition effect; Information uncertainty; Trading volume; Real estate; Quantile regression; LOSS AVERSION; INFORMATION ASYMMETRIES; SELLER BEHAVIOR; PROSPECT-THEORY; PRICE-INDEX; MOMENTUM; PERFORMANCE; INVESTORS; IMPACT; CONSTRAINTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102503
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the disposition effect and its determinants in the Taiwanese real estate market. Our empirical results show that while a disposition effect does exist, its effects decayed after 2012. Further analyses employing quantile regression on the holding period reveal that the disposition effect persists even after investors retain assets for extended durations. Our findings also indicate that investors maintain a propensity to sell wining assets and hold losing assets even when confronted with extreme returns. Thus, we conclude that disposition effect in the real estate market could be best explained by prospect theory. Most importantly, we demonstrate that changes in the disposition effect are attributed to an enhanced information environment involving, for example, economic events, policy changes, and market conditions associated with information transparency. These findings suggest that information environment and trading volume are pivotal factors influencing households' behavioral biases.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Do discounts mitigate numerological superstitions? Evidence from the Russian real estate market
    Burakov, Dmitry
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 13 (05): : 467 - 470
  • [42] Social Networks and the Success of Market Intermediaries: Evidence From the U.S. Residential Real Estate Industry
    Crowston, Kevin
    Sawyer, Steve
    Wigand, Rolf
    INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2015, 31 (05): : 361 - 378
  • [43] MOMENTUM AND DISPOSITION EFFECT IN THE STOCK MARKET OF USA
    Sadhwani, Ranjeeta
    Bhayo, Mujeeb U. Rehman
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH ECONOMICS & FINANCE CONFERENCE, 2019, : 173 - 192
  • [44] Salespeople's performance and digital technologies in real estate: Evidence from the Portuguese retail real estate sector
    Silva, Pedro Mendonca
    Santos, Jose Freitas
    Moutinho, Victor Ferreira
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 49 (01) : 18 - 31
  • [45] Managerial disposition effect: Evidence from China
    Wang, Kemin
    Zhang, Guanglong
    Zhou, Lin
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 78
  • [46] DETERMINANTS OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT
    Klimczak, Karol
    ECONOMICS & SOCIOLOGY, 2010, 3 (02) : 57 - 65
  • [47] Real estate market factors and foreign real estate investment
    Fereidouni, Hassan Gholipour
    Masron, Tajul Ariffin
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2013, 40 (04) : 448 - +
  • [48] Heterogeneous Impacts of Policy Sentiment with Different Themes on Real Estate Market: Evidence from China
    Ma, Diandian
    Lv, Benfu
    Li, Xuerong
    Li, Xiuting
    Liu, Shuqin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [49] RANDOM WALKS AND MARKET EFFICIENCY: EVIDENCE FROM REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REIT) SUBSECTORS
    Almudhaf, Fahad
    Hansz, Andrew J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 22 (02) : 81 - 92
  • [50] Estimating market power under a nonparametric analysis: evidence from the Chinese real estate sector
    Hirofumi Fukuyama
    Yong Tan
    OR Spectrum, 2023, 45 : 599 - 622