On the compatibility of established methods with emerging artificial intelligence and machine learning methods for disaster risk analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Thekdi, Shital [1 ]
Tatar, Unal [2 ]
Santos, Joost [3 ]
Chatterjee, Samrat [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Richmond, Robins Sch Business, Richmond, VA 23173 USA
[2] SUNY Albany, Cybersecur Dept, Albany, NY USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Engn Management & Syst Engn Dept, Washington, DC USA
[4] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Data Sci & Machine Intelligence Grp, Richland, WA USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; causal inference; disaster risk analysis; explainability; machine learning; trustworthiness; CAUSAL INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1111/risa.17640
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
There is growing interest in leveraging advanced analytics, including artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), for disaster risk analysis (RA) applications. These emerging methods offer unprecedented abilities to assess risk in settings where threats can emerge and transform quickly by relying on "learning" through datasets. There is a need to understand these emerging methods in comparison to the more established set of risk assessment methods commonly used in practice. These existing methods are generally accepted by the risk community and are grounded in use across various risk application areas. The next frontier in RA with emerging methods is to develop insights for evaluating the compatibility of those risk methods with more recent advancements in AI/ML, particularly with consideration of usefulness, trust, explainability, and other factors. This article leverages inputs from RA and AI experts to investigate the compatibility of various risk assessment methods, including both established methods and an example of a commonly used AI-based method for disaster RA applications. This article utilizes empirical evidence from expert perspectives to support key insights on those methods and the compatibility of those methods. This article will be of interest to researchers and practitioners in risk-analytics disciplines who leverage AI/ML methods.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 877
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comprehensive analysis of the emerging modern trends in research on photovoltaic systems and desalination in the era of artificial intelligence and machine learning
    Jathar, Laxmikant D.
    Nikam, Keval
    V. Awasarmol, Umesh
    Gurav, Raviraj
    Patil, Jitendra D.
    Shahapurkar, Kiran
    Soudagar, Manzoore Elahi M.
    Khan, T. M. Yunus
    Kalam, M. A.
    Hnydiuk-Stefan, Anna
    Gurel, Ali Etem
    Hoang, Anh Tuan
    Agbulut, Umit
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (03)
  • [42] Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Cardiology
    Westcott, R. Jeffrey
    Tcheng, James E.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (14) : 1312 - 1314
  • [43] Machine learning and artificial intelligence in haematology
    Shouval, Roni
    Fein, Joshua A.
    Savani, Bipin
    Mohty, Mohamad
    Nagler, Arnon
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2021, 192 (02) : 239 - 250
  • [44] Towards deep phenotyping pregnancy: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and machine learning methods to improve pregnancy outcomes
    Davidson, Lena
    Boland, Mary Regina
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2021, 22 (05)
  • [45] MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR SYSTEMIC RISK ANALYSIS IN FINANCIAL SECTORS
    Kou, Gang
    Chao, Xiangrui
    Peng, Yi
    Alsaadi, Fawaz E.
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2019, 25 (05) : 716 - 742
  • [46] Bias in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
    Dube, Raghavi
    Shafana, Jeenath N.
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 14 (09): : 227 - 234
  • [47] Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Cardiology
    Deo, Rahul C.
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 149 (16) : 1235 - 1237
  • [48] On the Methods of Artificial Intelligence for Analysis of Oncological Data
    D. K. Chebanov
    I. N. Mikhaylova
    Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 2020, 54 : 255 - 259
  • [49] Artificial intelligence and machine learning in dynamic cyber risk analytics at the edge
    Radanliev, Petar
    De Roure, David
    Walton, Rob
    Van Kleek, Max
    Montalvo, Rafael Mantilla
    Maddox, La'Treall
    Santos, Omar
    Burnap, Peter
    Anthi, Eirini
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 2 (11):
  • [50] Artificial intelligence and machine learning-powered GIS for proactive disaster resilience in a changing climate
    Diehr, Justin
    Ogunyiola, Ayorinde
    Dada, Oluwabunmi
    ANNALS OF GIS, 2025,