Inter-individual differences and task familiarity in illusion of control

被引:0
|
作者
Vera, Carlos M. [1 ,3 ]
Orgaz, Cristina [2 ]
Contreras, Maria Jose [2 ]
Montoro, Pedro R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia, Escuela Int Doctorado UNED, Programa Doctorado Psicol, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia, Dept Psicol Basica 1, Madrid, Spain
[3] Escuela Int Doctorado, Programa Doctorado Psicol Salud, C Juan Rosal 10, Madrid 28040, Spain
来源
PSICOLOGICA | 2024年 / 45卷 / 02期
关键词
causal illusion; illusion of causality; cognitive biases; contingency learning; differential psychology; individual differences; PSYCHOLOGY; MODEL;
D O I
10.20350/digitalCSIC/16258
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objectives : The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of task content in the illusion of control effect (i.e. the tendency to overestimate our chances of success beyond the objective probabilities). A secondary exploratory objective was to analyze individual differences in task performance. Methods : A total of 88 participants (36 aerospace engineers and 52 undergraduate psychology students) participated in this experiment performing a standard drug -related contingency judgment task (with a fictitious drug that could be effective for a fictitious disease) and a novel analogue task with aerospace content. In both tasks, there was a null contingency between treatment and recovery. However, the chance of spontaneous recovery was 70%, a baseline rate which tends to produce strong illusion of control effects in null contingency setups. The participants were tasked to identify the treatment effectivity (the normative answer was no effectivity at all). Results : The data showed a strong illusion of control with no significant difference between groups and tasks. A non -negligible number of participants displayed inefficient strategies during task performance. Discussion : Both tasks produced comparable results with no significant differences. Our data suggests that inter -individual effects need to be considered in future research and measures of central tendency must be used with caution.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On variability and genes: inter-individual differences in auditory brain function
    Soeroes, Peter
    Stanton, Susan G.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
  • [42] INTER-INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN HIPPOCAMPAL THETA ACTIVITY DURING HABITUATION
    IRMIS, F
    RADILWEI.T
    LAT, J
    KREKULE, I
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1970, 28 (01): : 24 - &
  • [43] Inter-individual Differences in the Effects of Aircraft Noise on Sleep Fragmentation
    McGuire, Sarah
    Mueller, Uwe
    Elmenhorst, Eva-Maria
    Basner, Mathias
    SLEEP, 2016, 39 (05) : 1107 - 1110
  • [44] Solving the puzzle of collective action through inter-individual differences
    von Rueden, Chris
    Gavrilets, Sergey
    Glowacki, Luke
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 370 (1683)
  • [45] INTER-INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE GLYCINE CONJUGATION OF SALICYLIC-ACID
    CALDWELL, J
    OGORMAN, J
    SMITH, RL
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1980, 9 (01) : P114 - P114
  • [46] The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition
    Ryota Kanai
    Geraint Rees
    Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2011, 12 : 231 - 242
  • [47] Symmetric Projection Attractor Reconstruction: Inter-Individual Differences in the ECG
    Lyle, Jane, V
    Nandi, Manasi
    Aston, Philip J.
    2021 COMPUTING IN CARDIOLOGY (CINC), 2021,
  • [48] Inter-individual differences in empathy are reflected in human brain structure
    Banissy, Michael J.
    Kanai, Ryota
    Walsh, Vincent
    Rees, Geraint
    NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 62 (03) : 2034 - 2039
  • [49] Pharmacogenomics: the inherited basis for inter-individual differences in drug response
    Evans, WE
    ANTIVIRAL THERAPY, 2003, 8 (04) : L3 - L4
  • [50] Intra- and inter-individual genetic differences in gene expression
    Mark J. Cowley
    Chris J. Cotsapas
    Rohan B. H. Williams
    Eva K. F. Chan
    Jeremy N. Pulvers
    Michael Y. Liu
    Oscar J. Luo
    David J. Nott
    Peter F. R. Little
    Mammalian Genome, 2009, 20 : 281 - 295