Prevalence of clinically significant prostate carcinoma in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) 3 lesions detected in the peripheral zone on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)da local experience

被引:0
|
作者
Khalid, M. J. [1 ]
Parker, P. [1 ]
Smith, S. [1 ]
Byass, O. R. [1 ]
Cast, J. E. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hull Univ Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Radiol, Kingston Upon Hull, England
关键词
CANCER; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2024.07.014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is effective in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate peripheral zone Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) 3 lesions without the use of dynamic contrast enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent biparametric MRI over a 12-month period from January 2022 to December 2022 and were diagnosed with PIRADS 3 lesion in the peripheral zone were included in the study. No patient received dynamic contrast enhancement. Histological analysis was done after performing local anesthetic transperineal biopsy to determine detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer. Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and biopsy complication rates were also reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-one out of 688 MRIs (8.8%) performed over the study period had a PIRADS 3 lesion in the peripheral zone where contrast is supposed to add value. Fifty-eight of the 61 went ahead to biopsy, and csPCa (Gleason score: >= 3 + 4, with a max core length of >= 6 mm and above) was diagnosed in 17%. Among those diagnosed with csPCa, 80% had a PSAD of >= 0.15 ng/ ml/cc. No postbiopsy complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Biparametric MRI without contrast offers a reliable alternative to multi- parametric MRI with minimum or neglible impact on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnosis in peripheral zone PIRADS 3 lesions, especially when used in conjunction with other factors such as PSAD. There is potential to address health economics and patient burden in prostate cancer investigation. (c) 2024 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 780
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reply to "Prostate Cancer and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions Identified at Multiparametric Prostate MRI"
    Sheridan, Alison D.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Spektor, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (06) : W269 - W269
  • [22] Impact of a Structured Reporting Template on Adherence to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 and on the Diagnostic Performance of Prostate MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Shaish, Hiram
    Feltus, Whitney
    Steinman, Jonathan
    Hecht, Elizabeth
    Wenske, Sven
    Ahmed, Firas
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (05) : 749 - 754
  • [23] Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography-fusion transperineal targeted biopsy for lesions with a prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 score of 3-5
    Hakozaki, Yuji
    Matsushima, Hisashi
    Murata, Taro
    Masuda, Tomoko
    Hirai, Yoko
    Oda, Mai
    Kawauchi, Nobuo
    Yokoyama, Munehiro
    Kume, Haruki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (02) : 217 - 222
  • [24] Comparisons of three scoring systems based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Li, Wei
    Xu, Haibing
    Shang, Wenwen
    Hong, Guohui
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 12 (04) : 201 - 206
  • [25] Comparison of the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with isolated peripheral versus transitional zone PIRADS 3 lesions
    Malshy, Kamil
    Ochsner, Anna
    Ortiz, Rebecca
    Ahn, Benjamin
    Glebocki, Richard
    Liu, Matthew
    Golijanin, Borivoj
    Eaton, Samuel
    Pareek, Gyan
    Hyams, Elias
    Golijanin, Dragan
    Khaleel, Sari
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2025, 92 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [26] Biparametric versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: detection of clinically significant cancer in a perfect match group
    Cho, Jungheum
    Ahn, Hyungwoo
    Hwang, Sung Il
    Lee, Hak Jong
    Choe, Gheeyoung
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (04) : 146 - 151
  • [27] Standardizing Biparametric MRI to Simplify and Improve Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, in Prostate Cancer Management
    Scialpi, Michele
    Martorana, Eugenio
    D'Andrea, Alfredo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 207 (04) : W74 - W75
  • [28] Added value of amide proton transfer-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 in differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer
    Ye, Yinquan
    Gong, Zijian
    Song, Yiling
    Yv, Lianyou
    Liu, Zhixuan
    Ying, Hongxing
    Qiu, Jia
    Dai, Jiankun
    Peng, Yun
    Gong, Lianggeng
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 14 (12)
  • [29] A NOVEL MACHINE LEARNING FRAMEWORK TO AUTOMATED CHARACTERIZE PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (PIRADS) ON MRI
    Cacciamani, Giovanni e.
    Kaneko, Masatomo
    Yang, Yijing
    Magoulianitis, Vasileios
    Xue, Jintang
    Yang, Jiaxin
    Liu, Jinyuan
    Lenon, Maria Sarah L.
    Mohamed, Passant
    Hwang, Darryl H.
    Gill, Karan
    Aron, Manju
    Duddalwar, Vinay
    Palmer, Suzanne L.
    Kuo, C. -C. Jay
    Gill, Inderbir
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    Nikias, Chrysostomos L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E771 - E771
  • [30] Data on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided targeted and systematic biopsy
    Klingebiel, M.
    Arsov, C.
    Ullrich, T.
    Quentin, M.
    Al-Monajjed, R.
    Mally, D.
    Sawicki, L. M.
    Hiester, A.
    Esposito, I
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2022, 45