Community-level diversity decreases right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation by alleviating dangerous and competitive worldviews: Multilevel and longitudinal tests of the Dual Process Model

被引:0
作者
Osborne, Danny [1 ]
Lilly, Kieren J. [1 ]
Huang, Yanshu [2 ]
Sibley, Chris G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
关键词
Dual Process Model; Social Dominance; Authoritarianism; Diversity; Worldviews; Multilevel Modelling; NEIGHBORHOOD ETHNIC DIVERSITY; INTERGROUP CONTACT; IMMIGRANT POPULATION; ANTI-IMMIGRANT; RACIAL THREAT; FIT INDEXES; PREJUDICE; ATTITUDES; PERSONALITY; IDEOLOGY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although living in diverse communities can affect socio-political views, studies rarely-if ever-assess mediators of the relationship between macro-level diversity and individual-level intergroup attitudes. According to the Dual Process Model of Ideology and Prejudice, community-level diversity should correlate negatively with right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) by reducing dangerous and competitive worldviews, respectively. Study 1 examined these hypotheses using a nationwide random sample of New Zealand Europeans (N = 11,007) nested in 254 communities. As hypothesised, community-level diversity had specific negative indirect effects on between-level variability in RWA and SDO via reductions in dangerous and competitive worldviews, respectively. Study 2 pursued a longitudinal follow-up (N = 9,355) and showed that dangerous and competitive worldviews predicted increases in RWA and SDO (respectively) a year later. Collectively, these results demonstrate that living in diverse communities can improve intergroup attitudes by reducing perceptions that the world is a dangerous and competitive place.
引用
收藏
页数:76
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Personality and Social Psychology Factors Explaining Sexism [J].
Akrami, Nazar ;
Ekehammar, Bo ;
Yang-Wallentin, Fan .
JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 32 (03) :153-160
[2]  
Allport G. W., 1954, The nature of prejudice(25thanniversary ed.).
[3]  
Altemeyer L.L.C., 1996, The authoritarian specter.
[4]   Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation and the Dimensions of Generalized Prejudice: A Longitudinal Test [J].
Asbrock, Frank ;
Sibley, Chris G. ;
Duckitt, John .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2010, 24 (04) :324-340
[5]   Benevolent and hostile sexism differentially predicted by facets of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation [J].
Austin, Darren E. J. ;
Jackson, Mervyn .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2019, 139 :34-38
[6]   When Authoritarians Confront Prejudice. Differential Effects of SDO and RWA on Support for Hate-Speech Prohibition [J].
Bilewicz, Michal ;
Soral, Wiktor ;
Marchlewska, Marta ;
Winiewski, Mikolaj .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 38 (01) :87-99
[7]  
Black Earl., 2002, RISE SO REPUBLICANS
[8]   The generalization of intergroup contact effects: Emerging research, policy relevance, and future directions [J].
Boin, Jessica ;
Rupar, Mirjana ;
Graf, Sylvie ;
Neji, Sybille ;
Spiegler, Olivia ;
Swart, Hermann .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2021, 77 (01) :105-131
[9]   Shaping the Development of Prejudice: Latent Growth Modeling of the Influence of Social Dominance Orientation on Outgroup Affect in Youth [J].
Bratt, Christopher ;
Sidanius, Jim ;
Sheehy-Skeffington, Jennifer .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2016, 42 (12) :1617-1634
[10]   Meet Your Neighbours. Authoritarians Engage in Intergroup Contact When They have the Opportunity [J].
Brune, Anna ;
Asbrock, Frank ;
Sibley, Chris G. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 26 (06) :567-580