The Influence of Intuitive-Analytical Cognitive Styles on Entrepreneurial Decision-Making Logic: Moderated by Environmental Uncertainty

被引:1
作者
Wei, Yalong [1 ]
Long, Dan [1 ]
Fu, Lihua [1 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Hefei, Peoples R China
关键词
entrepreneurial decision-making logic; cognitive style; environmental uncertainty; causal logic; effectual logic; EFFECTUATION; CAUSATION; MODELS; SMES;
D O I
10.1177/21582440241273297
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
By neglecting endogenous factors, existing studies that usually focus on examining the effect of exogenous characteristics on entrepreneurial decision-making logic has drawn conflicting conclusions. This paper explores the influences of cognitive styles on entrepreneurial decision-making logic, as well as the moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Using a multiregional sample of 336 Chinese entrepreneurs, the study obtained results by conducting multiple linear regression. Entrepreneurs with an intuitive cognitive style tend to apply causal logic, while those with an analytical cognitive style are inclined to adopt effectual logic. Environmental uncertainty moderates the effect of cognitive styles on some dimensions of entrepreneurial decision-making logic. In an uncertain environment, entrepreneurs with an intuitive cognitive style reduce the use of the logics of affordable loss and leveraging contingencies, while entrepreneurs with an analytical cognitive style reduce the use of the expected return logic. This paper clarifies the relationship between intuitive and analytical cognitive styles, which are always considered to be antithetical. This implies that they always coexist, instead of competing with each other in entrepreneurial decision-making. This finding verifies that entrepreneurial decision-making logic is the result of interactions between cognition and the environment, inspiring scholars to explore it from the combination of multiple elements. How does entrepreneurs' cognitive styles influence entrepreneurial decision-making logicEntrepreneurial decision-making logic significantly affects entrepreneurial performance. It contains two main types which are causal logic and effectual logic. Causal logic has four dimensions: goals-orientation logic, expected returns logic, competitive analysis logic, and avoiding contingencies logic. Effectual logic has four dimensions: means-orientation logic, affordable loss logic, partnerships logic, and leveraging contingencies logic. There's not much known about why entrepreneurs follow certain logic to make decisions. This paper explores the influences of cognitive styles on entrepreneurial decision-making logic. Cognitive style reflects individual differences in perceiving, thinking, learning, solving problems, and building connections with other people. It is categorized into two types: analytical and intuitive. This study empirically analyzes data from a sample of 336 entrepreneurs in China. It finds that entrepreneurs with an intuitive cognitive style tend to apply causal logic. Entrepreneurs with an analytical cognitive style are inclined to adopt effectual logic. Environmental uncertainty moderates the effect of cognitive styles on some dimensions of entrepreneurial decision-making logic. In uncertain environment, entrepreneurs with an intuitive cognitive style reduce the use of logics of affordable losses and leveraging contingencies, while entrepreneurs with an analytical cognitive style reduce the use of expected return logic.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Abdelfattah F, 2023, INT J INNOV STUD, V7, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.ijis.2023.04.001
[2]  
Allison C., 2000, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V9, P31, DOI [10.1080/135943200398049, DOI 10.1080/135943200398049]
[3]   Effectual exchange: from entrepreneurship to the disciplines and beyond [J].
Alsos, Gry Agnete ;
Clausen, Tommy Hoyvarde ;
Mauer, Rene ;
Read, Stuart ;
Sarasvathy, Saras D. .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2020, 54 (03) :605-619
[4]   Effectuation or causation to promote innovation in technology-based SMEs? The effects of strategic decision-making logics [J].
Alzamora-Ruiz, Jessica ;
del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, Maria ;
Martinez-Fiestas, Myriam .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2021, 33 (07) :797-812
[5]   Configurations of effectuation, causation, and bricolage: implications for firm growth paths [J].
An, Wenwen ;
Ruling, Charles-Clemens ;
Zheng, Xin ;
Zhang, Jianqi .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2020, 54 (03) :843-864
[6]  
Barbosa S.D., 2007, J LEADERSH ORG STUD, V13, P86, DOI [10.1177/10717919070130041001, DOI 10.1177/10717919070130041001]
[7]   Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance [J].
Brettel, Malte ;
Mauer, Rene ;
Engelen, Andreas ;
Kuepper, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2012, 27 (02) :167-184
[8]   A person-organization fit model of owner-managers' cognitive style and organizational demands [J].
Brigham, Keith H. ;
De Castro, Julio O. ;
Shepherd, Dean A. .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2007, 31 (01) :29-51
[9]   Entrepreneurship Research (1985-2009) and the Emergence of Opportunities [J].
Busenitz, Lowell W. ;
Plummer, Lawrence A. ;
Klotz, Anthony C. ;
Shahzad, Ali ;
Rhoads, Kevin .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2014, 38 (05) :981-1000
[10]   Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study [J].
Chandler, Gaylen N. ;
DeTienne, Dawn R. ;
McKelvie, Alexander ;
Mumford, Troy V. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2011, 26 (03) :375-390