Open strategy and digital transformation: A framework and future research agenda

被引:5
作者
Ortner, Thomas [1 ]
Hautz, Julia [1 ]
Stadler, Christian [2 ]
Matzler, Kurt [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Innsbruck, Sch Management, Dept Management & Mkt, Univ Str 15, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry, England
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; SOCIAL SOFTWARE; PARTICIPATION; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; METHODOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY; IMPRESSION; EVOLUTION; WIKIMEDIA;
D O I
10.1111/ijmr.12379
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Digital technologies increasingly facilitate more transparent information exchange and the inclusion of new and more actors in organizational processes. This resulting 'openness' has been studied in multiple domains, including open strategy. Since increased transparency and inclusion are the main dimensions of open strategy, it seems reasonable to assume a theoretical linkage between digital transformation and openness in the strategy process. So far, however, we lack a nuanced understanding about their overlaps and the nature of their interrelationships. In this review, we therefore explore how digital transformation and open strategy interrelate and influence each other and what conditions support or constrain the identified relationships. To do so, we systematically review and synthesize research on open strategy considering the role of digital transformation. We make two contributions: First, we develop a framework mapping out the relationships between digital transformation and open strategy. Our framework shows how open strategy and digital transformation are situated in a dynamic circle of mutual influence. Second, we adopt a strategy-as-practice perspective and identify and discuss the roles of agency, power, temporality and materiality. These features can either further support or hamper the identified linkages. Finally, we identify trajectories for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 345
页数:22
相关论文
共 119 条
[91]   Dealing with Wicked Issues: Open Strategizing and the Camisea Case [J].
Schmitt, Ruth .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 96 :11-19
[92]  
Schwarz JO, 2020, World Futures Review, V12, P291, DOI [10.1177/1946756720953182, 10.1177/1946756720953182, DOI 10.1177/1946756720953182]
[93]  
Seidl D, 2019, CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF OPEN STRATEGY, P9
[94]   Inter-organizational sensemaking in the face of strategic meta-problems: Requisite variety and dynamics of participation [J].
Seidl, David ;
Werle, Felix .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (03) :830-858
[95]   Openness as Organizing Principle: Introduction to the Special Issue [J].
Splitter, Violetta ;
Dobusch, Leonhard ;
von Krogh, Georg ;
Whittington, Richard ;
Walgenbach, Peter .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2023, 44 (01) :7-27
[96]   Middle Managers' Struggle Over Their Subject Position in Open Strategy Processes [J].
Splitter, Violetta ;
Jarzabkowski, Paula ;
Seidl, David .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2023, 60 (07) :1884-1923
[97]  
Stadler C., 2021, Open Strategy: Mastering Disruption from Outside the C-Suite
[98]  
Stadler C, 2020, NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, V12, P36, DOI [10.2478/nimmir-2020-0006, DOI 10.2478/NIMMIR-2020-0006]
[99]   Democratizing Strategy: HOW CROWDSOURCING CAN BE USED FOR STRATEGY DIALOGUES [J].
Stieger, Daniel ;
Matzler, Kurt ;
Chatterjee, Sayan ;
Ladstaetter-Fussenegger, Florian .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 54 (04) :44-68
[100]   Strategic Practice Drift: How Open Strategy Infiltrates the Strategy Process [J].
Stjerne, Iben ;
Geraldi, Joana ;
Wenzel, Matthias .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2024, 61 (03) :820-856