Know your tools - a comparison of two open agent-based energy market models

被引:1
作者
Maurer, Florian [1 ]
Nitsch, Felix [2 ]
Kochems, Johannes [2 ]
Schimeczek, Christoph [2 ]
Sander, Volker [1 ]
Lehnhoff, Sebastian [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Aachen, Aachen, Germany
[2] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Networked Energy Syst, Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
来源
2024 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET, EEM 2024 | 2024年
关键词
agent-based modeling; energy market; energy dispatch; open source; comparative simulation; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1109/EEM60825.2024.10609021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Due to the transition to renewable energies, electricity markets need to be made fit for purpose. To enable the comparison of different energy market designs, modeling tools covering market actors and their heterogeneous behavior are needed. Agent-based models are ideally suited for this task. Such models can be used to simulate and analyze changes to market design or market mechanisms and their impact on market dynamics. In this paper, we conduct an evaluation and comparison of two actively developed open-source energy market simulation models. The two models, namely AMIRIS and ASSUME, are both designed to simulate future energy markets using an agent-based approach. The assessment encompasses modelling features and techniques, model performance, as well as a comparison of model results, which can serve as a blueprint for future comparative studies of simulation models. The main comparison dataset includes data of Germany in 2019 and simulates the Day-Ahead market and participating actors as individual agents. Both models are comparable close to the benchmark dataset with a MAE between 5.6 and 6.4 (sic)/MWh while also modeling the actual dispatch realistically.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models
    An, Li
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2012, 229 : 25 - 36
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2024, Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland-GENESIS-Online: Ergebnis 51000-0032
  • [3] Evaluating the usability of open source frameworks in energy system modelling
    Berendes, S.
    Hilpert, S.
    Guenther, S.
    Muschner, C.
    Candas, S.
    Hainsch, K.
    van Ouwerkerk, J.
    Buchholz, S.
    Soethe, M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 159
  • [4] BMWK, 2024, Bundesministerium f ur Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz
  • [5] Brown T., 2018, J. Open Res. Softw., V6, P4, DOI DOI 10.5334/JORS.188
  • [6] Bundesnetzagentur, 2024, SMARD | Marktdaten
  • [7] ENTSO-E, 2024, ENTSO-E Transparency Platform
  • [8] European Energy Exchange AG, 2022, CEGHVTP Gas Futures
  • [9] Self-Reinforcing Electricity Price Dynamics under the Variable Market Premium Scheme
    Frey, Ulrich J.
    Klein, Martin
    Nienhaus, Kristina
    Schimeczek, Christoph
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (20)
  • [10] Data harmonisation for energy system analysis-Example of multi-model experiments
    Gardian, H.
    Beck, J. -p.
    Koch, M.
    Kunze, R.
    Muschner, C.
    Huelk, L.
    Bucksteeg, M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 162