An enclosure quality ranking framework for terrestrial animals in captivity

被引:0
作者
Flanagan, Alison M. [1 ]
Masuda, Bryce [1 ]
Grabar, Koa [1 ]
Barrett, Lisa P. [1 ]
Swaisgood, Ronald R. [1 ]
机构
[1] San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, POB 39, Volcano, HI 92112 USA
关键词
Welfare; Zoo animals; Captivity; Evidence-based conservation; Framework; Environment; BEHAVIOR; ENRICHMENT; HUSBANDRY; WELFARE; STRESS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106378
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
There is a burgeoning interest in measuring and improving animal welfare in captive settings. Recent work has emphasized how enclosure design elements directly impact animal welfare (e.g., from health, behavioral, and reproductive standpoints). Yet, there is no published systematic way for practitioners to quantitatively rank enclosure quality. To address this critical need, we developed a flexible enclosure quality ranking framework for terrestrial animals in captivity. Our enclosure framework comprises 11 broadly applicable and measurable components of enclosure design that have relevance to animal welfare: Display, Size, Shelter, Materials, Environment, Climate, Viewshed, Social, People, Other, and Complexity. Each of these components relates to one or more of the "Five Freedoms" and "Opportunities to Thrive". In addition to developing the enclosure quality ranking framework, we provide an example of how to apply the framework, and offer suggestions on how to conduct empirical analyses with the ranking data derived from our framework. Once applied, our framework can be used to generate measurable outcomes that practitioners can use to make informed decisions, leading to optimal animal welfare.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ethogram of Anodorhynchus leari (Aves: Psittacidae) in captivity: a framework for behavioral studies
    Favoretto, Gabriela R.
    Sugieda, Angelica M.
    Guida, Fernanda J. V.
    Piratelli, Augusto J.
    IHERINGIA SERIE ZOOLOGIA, 2024, 114
  • [22] Animals and Organisations: An Ethic of Care Framework
    Connolly, Lucy
    Cullen, John G.
    ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 31 (04) : 406 - 424
  • [23] Ranking of Wikipedia Articles in Search Engines Revisited: Fair Ranking for Reasonable Quality?
    Lewandowski, Dirk
    Spree, Ulrike
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 62 (01): : 117 - 132
  • [24] Principles, analytical framework and resources on farms for integrated health management in monogastric animals
    Fortun-Lamothe, Laurence
    Collin, Anne
    Combes, Sylvie
    Ferchaud, Stephane
    Germain, Karine
    Guilloteau, Laurence
    Gunia, Melanie
    Lefloc'h, Nathalie
    Manoli, Claire
    Montagne, Lucile
    Savietto, Davi
    INRAE PRODUCTIONS ANIMALES, 2022, 35 (04): : 307 - 326
  • [25] Relating ranging ecology, limb length, and locomotor economy in terrestrial animals
    Pontzer, Herman
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 296 : 6 - 12
  • [26] RANKING THE STRATEGIES OF MINING SECTOR THROUGH ANP AND TOPSIS IN A SWOT FRAMEWORK
    Azimi, Reza
    Yazdani-Chamzini, Abdolreza
    Fouladgar, Mohammad Majid
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Basiri, Mohammad Hossein
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 12 (04) : 670 - 689
  • [27] Integrated Fuzzy Ranking Analysis for Assessing the Quality of Composting Products
    Zhang, Yi Mei
    Huang, Guo He
    He, Li
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 136 (05) : 508 - 519
  • [28] Assessing the quality of domain ontologies: Metrics and an automated ranking system
    McDaniel, Melinda
    Storey, Veda C.
    Sugumaran, Vijayan
    DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2018, 115 : 32 - 47
  • [29] Reinforcement Learning and Episodic Memory in Humans and Animals: An Integrative Framework
    Gershman, Samuel J.
    Daw, Nathaniel D.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 : 101 - 128
  • [30] Innovation quality - a conceptual framework
    Haner, UE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2002, 80 (01) : 31 - 37