共 64 条
Practitioners' perspective of non-contact injury risk factors and injury prevention programming in professional North American male soccer
被引:0
作者:
Chesterton, Paul
[1
]
Wright, Matthew
[1
]
Liddle, Nathan
[1
]
Hardin, Stacey
[2
]
Richards, Skylar
[3
]
Draper, Garrison
[1
,4
]
机构:
[1] Teesside Univ, Sch Hlth & Life Sci, Borough Rd, Tees Valley TS1 3BA, England
[2] Laurus Athletic Rehab & Performance, Roseville, MN 55113 USA
[3] Orlando Hlth Orthoped & Sports Med, Orlando, FL 32806 USA
[4] Inter Miami CF, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33309 USA
关键词:
Sports medicine;
Soccer;
Musculoskeletal pain/prevention & control;
Injury prevention;
NORDIC HAMSTRING EXERCISE;
SPORTS INJURIES;
RUGBY UNION;
FOOTBALL;
PLAYERS;
IMPLEMENTATION;
METAANALYSIS;
PERFORMANCE;
LEVEL;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.06.003
中图分类号:
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号:
100215 ;
摘要:
Objective: To evaluate non -contact injury prevention strategies of professional men's soccer clubs in elite North American league soccer. To understand the application, perceived effectiveness and barriers to implementation. Design: Online cross -Sectional Study. Setting: North American elite soccer teams. Participants: 96 medical and performance support staff of elite North American teams. Main outcome measure: The survey consisted of 20 questions and captured 1) practitioners' demographics; 2) perceptions of risk factors; 3) the use of assessment and monitoring strategies; and 4) perceptions of the implementation of injury prevention programmes'. Results: Injury prevention programmes were perceived as 'effective' (Median 4, Interquartile range 4-4) and reduced injury rates (n = 94, 98%, 95 CI% 93 to 99). A range of potential risk factors were rated as "very important" (4.58 +/- 0.52 Likert scale points; mean +/- standard deviation). A multi -disciplinary approach to the design, application and monitoring of programmes was generally adopted. Competing training priorities (n = 75, 78%, 95 CI% 69 to 85) and game schedules (n = 71, 74%, 95 CI% 64 to 82) were the most prevalent barriers to injury prevention implementation. Conclusions: Injury prevention programmes were perceived as effective in reducing non -contact injuries. Managing the conflicting priorities between scheduling training, tactical and conditioning goals were considered the key barriers to desired implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 59
页数:9
相关论文