Practitioners' perspective of non-contact injury risk factors and injury prevention programming in professional North American male soccer

被引:0
作者
Chesterton, Paul [1 ]
Wright, Matthew [1 ]
Liddle, Nathan [1 ]
Hardin, Stacey [2 ]
Richards, Skylar [3 ]
Draper, Garrison [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Teesside Univ, Sch Hlth & Life Sci, Borough Rd, Tees Valley TS1 3BA, England
[2] Laurus Athletic Rehab & Performance, Roseville, MN 55113 USA
[3] Orlando Hlth Orthoped & Sports Med, Orlando, FL 32806 USA
[4] Inter Miami CF, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33309 USA
关键词
Sports medicine; Soccer; Musculoskeletal pain/prevention & control; Injury prevention; NORDIC HAMSTRING EXERCISE; SPORTS INJURIES; RUGBY UNION; FOOTBALL; PLAYERS; IMPLEMENTATION; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.06.003
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate non -contact injury prevention strategies of professional men's soccer clubs in elite North American league soccer. To understand the application, perceived effectiveness and barriers to implementation. Design: Online cross -Sectional Study. Setting: North American elite soccer teams. Participants: 96 medical and performance support staff of elite North American teams. Main outcome measure: The survey consisted of 20 questions and captured 1) practitioners' demographics; 2) perceptions of risk factors; 3) the use of assessment and monitoring strategies; and 4) perceptions of the implementation of injury prevention programmes'. Results: Injury prevention programmes were perceived as 'effective' (Median 4, Interquartile range 4-4) and reduced injury rates (n = 94, 98%, 95 CI% 93 to 99). A range of potential risk factors were rated as "very important" (4.58 +/- 0.52 Likert scale points; mean +/- standard deviation). A multi -disciplinary approach to the design, application and monitoring of programmes was generally adopted. Competing training priorities (n = 75, 78%, 95 CI% 69 to 85) and game schedules (n = 71, 74%, 95 CI% 64 to 82) were the most prevalent barriers to injury prevention implementation. Conclusions: Injury prevention programmes were perceived as effective in reducing non -contact injuries. Managing the conflicting priorities between scheduling training, tactical and conditioning goals were considered the key barriers to desired implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 59
页数:9
相关论文
共 64 条
[61]   Effect of specific exercise-based football injury prevention programmes on the overall injury rate in football: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the FIFA 11 and 11+programmes [J].
Thorborg, Kristian ;
Krommes, Kasper Kuhn ;
Esteve, Ernest ;
Clausen, Mikkel Bek ;
Bartels, Else Marie ;
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 51 (07) :562-+
[62]   Including the Nordic hamstring exercise in injury prevention programmes halves the rate of hamstring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 8459 athletes [J].
van Dyk, Nicol ;
Behan, Fearghal P. ;
Whiteley, Rod .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 53 (21) :1362-U62
[63]   The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies [J].
von Elm, Erik ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Egger, Matthias ;
Pocock, Stuart J. ;
Gotzsche, Peter C. ;
Vandenbroucke, Jan P. .
LANCET, 2007, 370 (9596) :1453-1457
[64]   The Effect of a Simulated Soccer Match on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factors [J].
Wright, Matthew ;
Chesterton, Paul ;
Wijnbergen, Mark ;
O'Rourke, Adrian ;
Macpherson, Tom .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 38 (08) :620-626