Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a NSQIP analysis

被引:3
作者
Powell, Chelsea [1 ,2 ]
Degregorio, Anthony [1 ]
Bews, Katie [2 ]
Wigle, Dennis [3 ]
Habermann, Elizabeth [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Robert D & Patricia E Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Deliv, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Surg, Div Thorac Surg, Rochester, MN USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2024年 / 38卷 / 10期
关键词
Paraesophageal hernia; Hiatal hernia; Robotic; Outcomes; NSQIP;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11158-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Studies comparing outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs have yielded conflicting results. We sought to analyze early postoperative complications between these approaches using a newly available NSQIP variable indicating robot use. Methods We queried the 2022 ACS NSQIP database for adult patients undergoing elective minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare cohort characteristics. Logistic, linear, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to compare perioperative outcomes between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. Results We identified 4345 patients who underwent repair using a laparoscopic (2778 patients; 63.9%) or robotic (1567 patients; 36.1%) approach. Most (73.1%) were female, and the median age was 65 (IQR 55, 73). Patients who underwent robotic repair were younger (median age 64 vs 66), had a slightly higher body mass index (BMI; median 30.2 vs 29.9), and were more likely to have hypertension (53.0% vs 48.5%), all p < 0.01. On unadjusted analysis the robotic approach was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (0.0% vs 0.4%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, gender, race, BMI, and hypertension, the robotic approach was not associated with increased major complications (5.6% vs 5.1%, AOR 1.13, 95% CI 0.86, 1.49), minor complications (0.9% vs 1.5%, AOR 1.20, 95% CI 0.74, 1.93), or unplanned readmission (6.5% vs 5.5%, AHR 1.17, 95% CI 0.89, 1.54), all p >= 0.26. After adjusting for age and hypertension, the robotic cohort had an increased risk of myocardial infarction (AOR 2.53, 95% CI 1.01, 6.33, p = 0.048) and pulmonary embolism (AOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.17, 6.49, p = 0.02), although none resulted in 30-day mortality. Conclusions Robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs had similar overall complication and readmission rates. The robotic cohort had an increased risk of myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism but no 30-day mortality. Current data support the use of both robotic and laparoscopic approaches for paraesophageal hernia repair.
引用
收藏
页码:5851 / 5857
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Short-term outcome after robot-assisted hiatal hernia and anti-reflux surgery-is there a benefit for the patient? [J].
Benedix, Frank ;
Adolf, Daniela ;
Peglow, Steffi ;
Gstettenbauer, Linda Marie ;
Croner, Roland .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2021, 406 (05) :1387-1395
[2]   Laparoscopic vs open approach for Nissen fundoplication - A comparative study [J].
Chrysos, E ;
Tsiaoussis, J ;
Athanasakis, E ;
Zoras, O ;
Vassilakis, JS ;
Xynos, E .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (12) :1679-1684
[3]   Early experience and learning curve associated with laparoscopic nissen fundoplication [J].
Deschamps, C ;
Allen, MS ;
Trastek, VF ;
Johnson, JO ;
Pairolero, PC .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 115 (02) :281-284
[4]   Favorable peri-operative outcomes observed in paraesophageal hernia repair with robotic approach [J].
Gerull, William D. ;
Cho, Daniel ;
Arefanian, Saeed ;
Kushner, Bradley S. ;
Awad, Michael M. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (06) :3085-3089
[5]   Operative time greater than 120 minutes is associated with increased pulmonary and thromboembolic complications following revision total hip arthroplasty [J].
Gu, Alex ;
Wei, Chapman ;
Chen, Aaron Z. ;
Malahias, Michael-Alexander ;
Fassihi, Safa C. ;
Ast, Michael P. ;
Liu, Jiabin ;
Cross, Michael B. ;
Sculco, Peter K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2020, 30 (08) :1393-1400
[6]   Minimally invasive approach to hiatal hernia repair is superior to open, even in the emergent setting: a large national database analysis [J].
Hosein, Salim ;
Carlson, Tyson ;
Flores, Laura ;
Armijo, Priscila Rodrigues ;
Oleynikov, Dmitry .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (01) :423-428
[7]   Diffusion of robotic-assisted laparoscopic technology across specialties: a national study from 2008 to 2013 [J].
Juo, Yen-Yi ;
Mantha, Aditya ;
Abiri, Ahmad ;
Lin, Anne ;
Dutson, Erik .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (03) :1405-1413
[8]   Surgical Duration and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism [J].
Kim, John Y. S. ;
Khavanin, Nima ;
Rambachan, Aksharananda ;
McCarthy, Robert J. ;
Mlodinow, Alexei S. ;
De Oliveria, Gildasio S., Jr. ;
Stock, M. Christine ;
Gust, Madeleine J. ;
Mahvi, David M. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (02) :110-117
[9]   Robotic Hiatal Hernia Repair Associated with Higher Morbidity and Readmission Rates Compared to Laparoscopic Repair: 10-Year Analysis from the National Readmissions Database (NRD) [J].
Klock, Julie A. A. ;
Walters, Ryan W. W. ;
Nandipati, Kalyana C. C. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2023, 27 (03) :489-497
[10]   What are the differences in the outcome of laparoscopic axial (I) versus paraesophageal (II-IV) hiatal hernia repair? [J].
Koeckerling, F. ;
Trommer, Y. ;
Zarras, K. ;
Adolf, D. ;
Kraft, B. ;
Weyhe, D. ;
Fortelny, R. ;
Schug-Pass, C. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (12) :5327-5341